Cultural Imperialism

American Cultural Imperialism: Fact or Myth? The phenomenon known as globalization has brought sweeping changes to the world. Forces associated with globalization like the spread of capitalism, advancements in communications and information technology, and expansion of the media have contributed to these changes. The main trademark of globalization has been an increasing flow of exchange in trade and culture. With this lowering of barriers, some people have begun to talk of a global culture. Others go even further to fear cultural imperialism from powers dominant in trade products, multinational corporations, and media. More specifically, critics are attacking the American hegemony on culture, with its domination in media and commercial products. However, it is easy to cry wolf in these situations. To determine if American cultural imperialism is occurring, we must examine concepts of cultural imperialism, how it is spread, and cultural imperialist theories in relation to media and commercial products of capitalism, and the counterarguments against those theories. After this careful examination, I will show that the cultural imperialism thesis is severely weakened in the face of human agency and hybridization, and that fears of American hegemony in culture are exaggerated. Establishing a general concept of cultural imperialism is important. The problem with many cultural imperialism arguments is that often they refer to different meanings. For instance, Petras defines cultural imperialism as "the systematic penetration and domination of the cultural life of the popular classes by the ruling class of the West in order to reorder the values, behavior, institutions, and identity of the oppressed peoples to conform with the interests of the imperial classes" (Petras 139). However, his definition may clash with the concept of cultural imperialism formed by other imperialist theorists. In fact, many will find it difficult to provide substantial

Bibliography: Appadurai, Arjun. "Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy." Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990): 295-310. Archer, Margaret. "Theory, Culture, and Post-Industrial Society." Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990): 97-120. Featherstone, Mike. "Global Culture: An Introduction." Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990):1-14. Hamelink, Cees J. Cultural Autonomy in Global Communications. New York: Longman Inc., 1983. Hannerz, Ulf. "Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture." Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990): 237-252. Hill, Christopher. "World Opinion and the Empire of Circumstance." International Affairs 72 (January 1996): 109-131. Rauth, Jr., Robert K. "The Myth of Cultural Imperialism." The Liberty Haven. 2001 http://www.libertyhaven.com/noneoftheabove/culture/mythcultural.shtml Schiller, Herbert I. Communication and Cultural Domination. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press, Inc., 1976. Schiller, Herbert I. Culture, Inc. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1989. Schiller, Herbert I. Information Inequality. New York: Routledge, 1996. Schiller, Herbert I. Mass Communications and American Empire. Colorado: Westview Press, Inc., 1992. Smith, Anthony D. "Towards a Global Culture?" Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990): 171-192. Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle. The Many Cultural Faces of Imperialism. Beyond Cultural Imperialism. Golding, Peter and Harris, Phil. California, SAGE Publications, Ltd., 1997. Tomlinson, John. Cultural Imperialism. London: Pinter Publishers Limited, 1991. Wallerstein, Immanuel. "Culture as the Ideological Battleground of the Modern World-System." Theory, Culture, and Society 7.2-7.3 (June 1990): 31-56. Wheeler, Deborah. "Global Culture or Culture Clash: New Information Technologies in the Islamic World – A View from Kuwait." Communication Research 25.4 (August 1998): 359-376.