Preview

Critical Appraisal Is The Systematic Process Used To Identify The Strengths And Weaknesses Of A Research Article In Order To Assess The Usefulness And Validity Of Research Findings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical Appraisal Is The Systematic Process Used To Identify The Strengths And Weaknesses Of A Research Article In Order To Assess The Usefulness And Validity Of Research Findings
“Critical Appraisal is the systematic process used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research findings.” I am going to attempt to critically appraise the following article, Seers et al (2008) “A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain”. The aim of this research is to assess the effectiveness of nurse administered massage on the short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain. The research findings conclude that massage is effective in the short term relief of moderate to severe pain. The research paper is useful in that it answers the question proposed however there is no reasoning as to why the massage works as it is stated in the paper that the reasons are not known. This perhaps brings into question the validity of the research findings as they are based on the opinions and pain interpretation of the patients, qualitative research rather than quantitive research, scientific facts. Moreover there is no reasoning as to why the massage effect is short term, and the effect of pain relief after several sessions of nurse administered massage. In addition the patients use of analgesic meant that the effect of massage could no longer considered in the study. This meant that there was a large dropout rate of patients that requested analgesic, and the sample is considerably smaller in both the study and control group affecting the validity of the results. This gives at least an indication that because patients who dropped out did so because they requested an analgesic, those in the massage group who stayed in the study did so because they had less pain. To conclude my critical appraisal on this research paper although the research findings answer the question asked the reasoning behind is not identified thus questioning the research papers validity.
References
Jane M



References: Jane M Young and Michael J Solomon. (2009). How to critically appraise an article. Available: http://www.nature.com/nrgastro/journal/v6/n2/full/ncpgasthep1331.html. Last accessed 3rd April 2013. Kate Seers1*, Nicola Crichton2, June Martin3, Katrina Coulson4 and Dawn Carroll5. (2008). A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10. Last accessed 3rd April 2013

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Select the quantitative or qualitative critical appraisal form available on the McMaster university site: http://bit.ly/bc7hlm. Using the guidelines to help you, try to critique the article you chose in time out 4. Phase 2: appraising the quality of articles The term ‘assessing study quality’ is often used interchangeably with ‘assessing the internal validity’ – that is, the extent to which a study is free from methodological biases’ (Petticrew and Roberts 2006) or ‘the degree to which the results of a study are likely to approximate the “truth”’ (The Cochrane Collaboration 2009). Jadad (1998) suggested that the following points should be considered when assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials: 4Relevance of the research question. 4Internal validity of the trial – the degree to which the trial design, conduct, analysis and presentation minimise bias. 4External validity – the extent to which findings are generalisable. 4Appropriateness of the data analysis and presentation. 4Ethical implications. In the context of systematic reviews, quality refers to the methodological quality – the internal and external validity of quantitative studies.The criteria for qualitative studies are different. These studies are often judged on the basis of BOX…

    • 4688 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When critiquing a research paper, you are evaluating the research and the argument made by the author. To evaluate a research article, one will need to look at what the author is claiming, their research methods, and any problems there might be with the claims made. Are the references in the article reliable? What process did the researchers use? Do the researchers show bias with their findings? There are many questions to ask and many elements to look at when critiquing a research paper. This paper will critique two different research articles; one qualitative and one quantitative.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Identify the assumptions and limitations of findings in a peer-reviewed article on healthcare research.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this assignment is to analyse the legal and professional issues involved within a critical incident observed whilst in clinical practice and to discuss the interprofessional workings of the professionals involved. A critical incident is an event which has left either a negative or positive impact on the observer or participant, this information can then be used to inform future practice (Flanagan 1954). This assignment will first describe the critical incident witnessed, the legal and professional issues will be briefly discussed and advocacy explored in depth. Interprofessional working surrounding the incident will be discussed focusing on the importance of interprofessional…

    • 4020 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    psych journal review

    • 2278 Words
    • 10 Pages

    OVERVIEW: This is Part 1 of a two-part assignment designed to guide you through the steps of critically reviewing a published, evidence-based, scholarly journal article. This is an activity in which students engage frequently across their college careers in the completion of a variety of assignments. The article you review will be selected from the classroom Resources folder.…

    • 2278 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Berry, P, PhD, RN, CRNH, CS, & Dahl, J, PhD. (2000). The new JCAHO pain standards: Implications for pain management nurses. Pain Management Nursing, Vol 1(Issue 1), 3-12. Retrieved from http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/S1524-9042(00)04110-2/abstract…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Centeral Venous Infection

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Critiquing a study involves the application of some basic guidelines to assist in finding answers for some questions. They are: 1) what are the research problem significant? 2) What are the major strengths and weakness of the study? 3) Does the researcher use sound methodology? 4) Was the study results valid? 5) Is there any study replicated and what is the results comparison? Are there any implications to practical applications? (Burns & Groves, 2006). By answering these questions one can find the strengths, weakness, and validity, reliability and implications of the study to the practice.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pain is the most frequent nursing diagnosis and the most common problems for which patients in the clinical setting seek help (Mobily, Herr, & Kelley, 1993). Pain refers to an unpleasant, distressful and uncomfortable feeling. Several studies have showed that unrelieved pain can affect the quality of life of the individual, cause physical and emotional distress, impact family, as well as increase the costs for health care, the individual, and society (Ferrell, 1995). Thus, pain is a critical problem in the health care system.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    critical evaluation

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Japan in 1945 were not seen as a logical reaction to the war by everyone. Leo Szilard was a Hungarian physicist that was the first to conceive of the mechanics of the atomic bomb, and how it worked. He was fighting the use of these bombs on Japan, and trying to urge the President to reconsider the idea. Although he lost the argument over whether to use the bombs, his argument was valid based on the devastation that was caused by the atomic bombs in Japan. Given the results of the devastation in Japan, his side of the argument is unmistakably seen.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Evaluation Essay

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The thing I enjoyed most about this assignment was the actual reading of the petition. I had never known this existed, and love history!…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pain management is a major concern for nursing care. Not only does controlling pain help the patient rest and heal, it also improves patient satisfaction. Pain management involves more than providing the patient with pain medication, it is an entire nursing process that starts at the time of admission. “A thorough pain history and shared goal setting are critical components of effective pain management that leads to beneficial outcomes” (Glowacki, 2015). Pain history includes past experiences of pain, current and past pain methods that have managed pain effectively, a tolerable level of pain, triggers of pain, and so on. Obtaining this history is imperative for the nurse in order to meet the patient’s pain management goals. This may just be…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I do not believe the Norman and Malla article presented a clear or critical literature review. The article is inconcise and confusing, it lacks organisation and a logical connection to the hypothesis.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nursing Research

    • 3008 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The critical framework used to critique the article is by Benton and Cormack (2001), (appendix 2). Parahoo (2006) will be used to compare any findings and support any arguments. This will analyse the validity of the research article used, and will guide the student through a step by step analysis leading to an unbiased and concise conclusion of the article. The students choose Benton and Cormack as her critiquing framework as she found it the easiest one to use.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASP was originated in Oxford, which produces various appraisal tools for different methodologies; such as, RCT, systematic reviews and so forth (CASP, 2013). Therefore, CASP RCT checklists provide a total of eleven questions, which guides an individual to determine the quality and validity of the research study (Cleyle and Glynn, 2006). These eleven questions are then divided into three sections; which includes (A) “Are the results of the trial valid?”, (B) “What are the results?”, (C) “Will the results help locally?” (CASP, 2013). This checklist can be accessed and downloaded on the internet through the CASP website (http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_40b9ff0bf53840478331915a8ed8b2fb.pdf).…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nordby,K. Kjonsberg, K. Hummelvoll, J.K.(2009) Relatives of persons with recently discovered serious mental illness: in need of support to become resource persons in treatment and recovery.(Appendix 1). Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing. 17, 304-311.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays