Preview

Critical And Creative Thinking Of Law Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical And Creative Thinking Of Law Research Paper
Critical and Creative Thinking Of Law
COMM 600

Critical and Creative Thinking Of Law
Ever been stuck on that one level of Candy Crush and cannot seem to get past it? Then, to make things worse, you notice all the other players on levels 254, 386, or some other outrageous level, while you have been stuck on level 46 for months. How on earth are these people so talented and smart? The answer is simple. It is called critical and creative thinking. Critical and creative thinking are two methods used to formulate a genuine response to a situation, which the decision could affect the future. This article identifies how important critical and creative thinking is in the hands of a judge, the characteristics of both thinking processes, and how it leads to higher intellectual thinking and decision making.
Experience in Critical and Creative Thinking Every person is faced
…show more content…
How would the outcome of our decision affect others? What will be accomplished in our decision-making? What behavioral patterns will be eliminated? After, writing out all of the details to both sides of the story and examining possible motives, we concluded that the defendant was not guilty. There was not enough evidence to prove the defendant guilty and the story of the victim did not add up.
The pressure of making these paramount decisions is not a job anyone should wish for. Any wrong decision could affect the life of another individual, or worse, more than one person. This is only one prime example why critical and creative thinking is an important factor in an effective decision-making process. The critical and creative thinking must be used by those who have the power to determine whether or not an individual is guilty or not guilty and how the guilty will pay for the consequences they brought upon themselves.
Critical and Creative Thinking

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are number of situations that come to mind where critical and creative thought could have been used for a better outcome. And major disaster could have been prevented from happening just by using the critical thinking process in decision making. According to "Critical Thinking Community" (2012), "Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.” (Critical thinking...the awakening of the intellect to the study of itself.). The best ( or the worst) example of the absence of…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case relates to the Crime Control Model because Stevenson was hooked to a stun belt during the court proceeding as if he had already been found guilty. If he had been assumed innocent until proven guilty there would not have been any need to hook a stun belt to an innocent man. The jury was prejudiced by seeing the stun…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phl/458 Critical Thinking

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A good example of a situation which lacked critical thinking was the case against pro football player Ray Rice. Rice had a physical altercation with his fiancé that he immediately reported to the NFL. The lack of critical thinking was not only on Rice’s part, but with the Baltimore Ravens camp. Rice was initially suspended for three games as a result of his actions. It was not until the situation became public that the NFL decided to take further aggressive action against Rice. This situation could have been handled much differently had the NFL thought out the potential impact Rice’s actions would have on the NFL, its fans,…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, a 16-year-old boy, who was abused by his father for about 13 years, was suspected of the murder of his own father. However, the jurors pointed out that the testimonies are shaky- and possibly they are just lying- and the physical evidences does not prove that the boy stabbed his father. The jurors were all convinced that there is no evidence sufficient to prove that the boy is an actual murderer. Ultimately, they brought and found this boy ‘not…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beyond Feelings

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To some being able to process your thoughts will come natural. But to others it may not. This chapter discusses critical thinking in depth. The distinction…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical thinkers maintain a healthy skepticism. They examine definitions of terms, weigh premises, consider evidence, and decide whether arguments are valid and logical. When making an important decision in your life, it can be extremely helpful in thinking critically about certain situations. For example, sex or sexual intercourse is something all people should take seriously. Sure, when people think about sex, they tend to think more on the positive side of the effects of sex. However, there is much more to take into consideration: are you young? What would happen if you were to get pregnant? Are you in high school?…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They claim that there have been so many new advances in the judicial system in a variety of aspects, that there is virtually no chance that the innocent would be wrongly convicted. For example, in an article entitled “Policing and Wrongful Convictions” by Anthony W. Batts, Maddy deLone and Darrel W. Stephens, the authors assert that a newly developed strategy called heuristics is being implemented to prevent wrongful convictions within the judicial system. Specifically, this method helps jurors analyze information presented as evidence in order to ensure a fair verdict (Batts). However, even if there are newly developed processes to aid in making a just conviction, these strategies are not infallible. While they may increase the chances of correctly delivering an accurate verdict, there is still a chance that an innocent person would be wrongly…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    21/1/2014 Assessment CCC8001 Logic and Critical Thinking Topic 1 Introduction: What is Critical Thinking? • Class participation 30% ‐ Attendance, participation in class discussions, in‐class exercises (Please note that attendance is obligatory for this course) )…

    • 1777 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical thinking is something that I use throughout my work at the Regina Police Service as a Direct Entry Reporter. I answer calls from disgruntled, crying, scared or hysterical citizens regarding incidents that have occurred to them. It is then my job to direct them to other units, take their report, or call to dispatch officers. I personally use critical thinking throughout the call in order to determine what course of action to take. This involves looking at all of the evidence that is in front of me and determining how to best accommodate to the citizen in distress. Although I use critical thinking as a DEVR operator I believe one of my greatest challenges was working for the chip company Frito Lay for a summer as a relief driver.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting thee press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Restricting the Monkey Juice billboards have raised an important constitutional issue which our company will use in our effort to challenge the ordinance. Because prohibiting the billboards that advertise alcohol is directly regulating speech, then it is safe to say that is directly violate the right of free speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S Constitution.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. It includes the ability to engage in reflective and independent thinking. Someone with critical thinking skills is able to do the following: understand the logical connections between ideas, identify, construct, and evaluate arguments, detect discrepancies and common mistakes in reasoning, solve problems systematically, identify the relevance and importance of ideas, and reflect on the justification of one's own beliefs and values.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical thinking is an essential process in daily life since it allows people to participate in deliberative and self-determining thinking. According to Joe Lau (n.d.), it is used to qualify our thinking procedure by understanding and identifying the vague concepts, evaluating and discussing the related debate. In this assignment, I would like to illustrate and evaluate the critical thinking skill I have applied in my daily life with a decision-making experience. I would firstly describe the chosen event, and then apply the critical thinking strategies into the case. Next, I would discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using those strategies. Finally, I would reflect on my decision.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 3767 Words
    • 16 Pages

    4. Critical thinking is NOT __________. I. negative II. fault finding III. exercising observation IV. involving skilled judgment A. B. C. D. I I, II I, II, III I, II, III, IV Continued……

    • 3767 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics