Preview

Critdiscanalysis.Doc

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critdiscanalysis.Doc
Critical discourse analysis Norman Fairclough

‘Critical discourse analysis’ (henceforth CDA) subsumes a variety of approaches towards the social analysis of discourse (Fairclough & Wodak 1997, Pêcheux M 1982, Wodak & Meyer 2001) which differ in theory, methodology, and the type of research issues to which they tend to give prominence. My own work in this area has also changed to some extent in these respects between the publication of Language and Power (Longman 1989) and the publication of Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (2003). My current research is on processes of social change in their discourse aspect (Fairclough 1992 is an early formulation of a version of CDA specialized for this theme). More specifically, I am concerned with recent and contemporary processes of social transformation which are variously identified by such terms as ‘neo-liberalism’, ‘globalisation’, ‘transition’, ‘information society’, ‘knowledge-based economy’ and ‘learning society’. I shall focus here on the version of CDA I have been using in more recent (partly collaborative) work (Chiapello & Fairclough 2002, Chouliaraki & Fairclough 1999, Fairclough 2000a, 2000b, 2003, 2004, Fairclough, Jessop & Sayer 2004).

Methodologically, this approach entails working in a ‘transdisciplinary’ way through dialogue with other disciplines and theories which are addressing contemporary processes of social change. ‘Transdisciplinary’ (as opposed to merely ‘interdisciplinary’, or indeed ‘postdisciplinary’, Sum & Jessop 2001) implies that the theoretical and methodological development (the latter including development of methods of analysis) of CDA and the disciplines/theories it is in dialogue with is informed through that dialogue, a matter of working with (though not at all simply appropriating) the ‘logic’ and categories of the other in developing one’s own theory and methodology (Fairclough forthcoming a). The overriding objective is to give accounts



References: Althusser (L.) & Balibar (E.). 1970. Reading Capital. London: New Left Books. Bernstein (B.). 1990. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. Bhaskar (R.). 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso. Boia (L.). 1997 History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness. Budapest: Central European University Press. Bourdieu (P.) and Wacquant (L.). 1992 An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Butler (J.), Laclau (E.) & Žižek (S). 2000 Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London: Verso. Cameron (A.) & Palan (R.). 2004 The Imagined Economies of Globalization. London: Sage. Chiapello (E.) & Fairclough (N.). 2002. Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and the new sociology of capitalism. In: Discourse & Society 13 (2) 185-208. Chouliaraki (L). & Fairclough (N.). 1999 Discourse in Late Modernity: Re-Thinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough (N.). 2000a Discourse, social theory and social research: the discourse of welfare reform. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 4.2. Fairclough (N.). 2003 Analyzing Discourse and Text: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Fairclough (N.) Jessop (R.) & Sayer (A.). 2004 Critical realism and semiosis. In: Joseph (J.) & Roberts (J.). eds. Realism discourse and Deconstruction. London: Routledge. Fairclough (N.) & Wodak (R.). 1997 Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk (T.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. Foucault (M.). 1984. The order of discourse. In: Shapiro (M.). ed. The Politics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell. Fowler (R.), Kress (G.), Hodge (B.) & Trew (T.). 1979 Language and Control. London: Routledge. Garnham (N.). 2001 The information society: myth or reality? Bugs, Globalism and Pluralism conference, Montreal. Giddens (A.). 1990 Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Godin (B.). 2004 The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? Project on the History and Sociology of S & T Statistics, Working Paper 24. Gramsci (A.). 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart. Halliday (M.A.K.). 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday (M.A.K.). 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold. Harvey (D.). 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell. Jessop (B.). 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop (B.). 2004 Cultural political economy, the knowledge-based economy, and the state. MS. Kress (G.) & van Leeuwen (T.). 2000. Multimodal Discourse. London: Arnold. Laclau (E.) and Mouffe (C.). 1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy., London: Verso. Pêcheux (M.). 1982. Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan. Pickles (J.) & Smith (A.). 1998. The Political Economy of Transition. London: Routledge. Ray (L.) & Sayer (A.). 1999. Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn. London: Sage. Repere 2.1. 2004. România în lumea contemporană (contributions to a Colloquium at the New Europe College, Bucharest). Sayer (A.). 1995. Radical Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell. Sayer (A.). 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cited: Edwards, James C. The Authority of Language. Tampa: University of South Florida Press, 1990…

    • 8948 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the “reoccurring ways of speaking that challenge societies taken for granted assumptions and offer alternatives to prevailing discourse.”(Cox 68) Critical Discourse challenges socially dominant ideas or beliefs. The value comes from the timing in which I learned it. During election season, I was looking for someone to challenge many of the ideas that have become dominant over the past few decades. Unfortunately, neither candidate did much to appease that desire. For instance, sustainability was yet again a “boring” topic to our media and did not get the airtime and attention it warranted. However, it is encouraging that one can slowly start to see more of this Critical Discourse in other parts of the media. Conversely, Critical Discourse has caused massive division in the American community. People have used it to contest everything that does not agree with their dogmata, but the problem comes when one disagrees without knowing what they are fighting for. Discourse in America is more important now than…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fairclough focuses immensely on the study of how enterprises function through the theory of discourse and power. In addition, “He has also addressed how to integrate theory and method in order to promote social change” (Tracy, Martinez-Guillem, Robles, and C’asteline). As for Dijk, and his studies- he argues that in order to understand the process of discourse you must also present cognition to the concept of discourse as well. Lastly, with Wodak, she explores how particular genres of discourse change over time (Tracy, Martinez-Guillem, Robles, and…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meritocracy Fair

    • 2968 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The culture of critical discourse (CDD) is characterized by speech that is relatively more situation-free, more context of field “independent”.…

    • 2968 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Participants of the Discourse are from different Discourse systems and hence they have different social identities in the society, namely office ladies, housewives and secondary school students. Majority of the participants are female.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chun Kit Dixon Wong U0907754 Writing 1010 – 006 10 February 2015 In “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: introduction” James P Gee presents his analysis of discourse. Gee discussed Discourse and discourse. With the capital “D which included saying, writing, doing, being, valuing, believing and so forth. The other discourse with the little “d”, it only means connected stretches of language that make sense (Gee, 1989: Page 5)…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Heritage, J. and Atkinson, J.M. (1984) ‘Introduction’ in Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge,…

    • 2825 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discourses, using spoken or written language in a social context, are more than narratives of human existence. A contemporary feminist author and professor, Chris Weedon, paraphrases French philosopher, Michel Foucault in the following passage: (discourses are) “ways of constituting knowledge, together with the social practices, forms of subjectivity and power relations which inhere in such knowledges and relations between them. Discourses are more than ways of thinking and producing meaning. They constitute the 'nature ' of the body, unconscious and conscious mind and emotional life of the subjects they seek to govern” (Weedon, 1987, p. 108). This definition…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discourse Community

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Piyash, Mujahidul Professor Watson Science of Language 11/04/2014 Critical Analysis Essay Draft 1. Discourse means “the way of being” in a community. Discourse community is where a group of people involved and share their opinion, knowledge about a particular topic. Conflicts can be create when rebellion happens in a discourse community. Rebellion in a discourse community try to change the rules which creates conflict with leaders of the particular discourse community.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pillow Method

    • 9634 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Lakoff, R. B. (2001). Nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (eds.), 199 214. Oxford: Blackwell.…

    • 9634 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lemke, J . L. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kevin Rudd

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lewis, G, & Slade C 1994, ‘Critical Communication’, Language in Context, Sydney: Prentice Hall, pp.25-49.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, a habitus is referring to a person’s way of thinking, acting, and behaving. A habitus is a structure that helps a person comprehend and deal with society. It can be simply seen as a merger of society and the individual. (Wysocka, Paulina, 2013). Habitus is both a “structured structure”—the effect of the actions of, and our interactions with, others—and a “structuring structure”—it suggests and constrains our future actions (Bourdieu, 1992). In other words, habitus is both the “embodiment of our social location” (i.e., class, ethnicity, race, sexuality, gender, generation, and nationality) (Noble & Watkins, 2003) and “the structure of social relations that generate and give significance to individual likes (or taste) and dislikes with regard to practice and action” (Laberge, 1995). Critically, the habitus is embodied, that is, “located within the body and affects every aspect of human embodiment” (Shilling, 1993). Theorists believe that stereotypes, narratives, ideologies and discourses all attribute to the shaping on the individual habitus. In this essay I will discuss and argue how each concept works according to various theorists and how they work in shaping the individual habitus.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wardle, Elizabeth, Doug Downs, and John Swales. "John Swales: The Concept of a Discourse Community." 2010. Writing about Writing: A College Reader. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2011. 467-80. Print.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biopower

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    [ 4 ]. Anna Fina, Discourse and identity, (New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006), 120.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays