Expert Immunity Expert immunity is mentioned in section 7.2 of the Guide and the general principle is that expert witnesses are immune from civil claims. This is a well established principle aimed at ensuring that experts give evidence freely and independently.
The position is less clear following a few recent decisions. In Philips v Symes  EWHC 2330 the court found not only that an Expert could be joined as a respondent, but that he could also be made liable for a party's costs if he has acted "recklessly or in flagrant disregard of his duties to the court".
In the highly publicised case of General Medical Council v Meadow  EWCA Civ 1390, the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's decision to extend the immunity from suit to disciplinary proceedings. As a result, Experts may be vulnerable to disciplinary proceedings if it can be shown that their evidence in court demonstrates they are not fit to practice in a particular discipline.
Overall, this emphasises the need to ensure that great care is taken and the highest standards are observed in giving evidence. When giving evidence an Expert must bear this in mind. Any issues should be discussed with the legal representatives as appropriate. The Expert's duties to the client and the Court are set out in section 7 of the Guide.
Legal Privilege The issues concerning legal privilege are set out in various sections of the Guide. Section 4.3 of the Guide deals with privilege and disclosure and section 6.3 of the... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2011, 04). Criminal Justice Process in Malaysia. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 04, 2011, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Criminal-Justice-Process-In-Malaysia-647838.html
"Criminal Justice Process in Malaysia" StudyMode.com. 04 2011. 04 2011 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Criminal-Justice-Process-In-Malaysia-647838.html>.
"Criminal Justice Process in Malaysia." StudyMode.com. 04, 2011. Accessed 04, 2011. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Criminal-Justice-Process-In-Malaysia-647838.html.