Crevecoeur Rhetorical Questions

Definition of the American Many people alive today have their own definition of the present-day American. When conveying his definition of an American, Michel-Guillaume Hean de Crevecoeur praises America, presents rhetorical questions, and uses symbolism to present his views. Crevecoeur’s definition of the American is heavily laced with praise for the individual American, as well as for the nation itself. He states that “the American…ought to love this country much better than that wherein he or his forefathers were born,” boldly pronouncing his positive opinion of America. Crevecoeur defines what an American “ought” to do on more occasions: “The American is a new man acting upon new principles,” is one of the various declarations the writer
This rhetorical question, used to make a point rather than to inquire the reader’s opinion, serves as the basis for the first half of this detailed definition while allowing the reader to think of his own answer which he then can compare to the author’s. The question also is most likely serving to form a point of agreement between writer and reader because it asks a question that has a nearly unanimous answer: “None.” Many may agree that there is actually little to no real attachment to have in that situation. Two other rhetorical questions further along in Crevecoeur’s work guide the reader into agreeing with him. “His labor is founded on…self interest. Can it want a stronger allurement?” Also, “Here, religion demands but little of him…Can he refuse [this]?” These questions fill the purpose of having the reader both recognize Crevecoeur’s reasoning and to agree with him; the author does not specifically make a statement, allowing the reader to think that they agree with one another without actually having to. This, in turn, gives the reader a sense of trust in the writer and his
Perhaps the author is speaking of the way knowledge and ability cyclically give birth to more of such things—Europe provided its people with information and new discoveries which the Americans would then bring to a new nation—thereby completing the “great circle” of knowledge. Furthermore, since a true circle has no real beginning or end, Americans would be the starters as well as the finishers of the “great circle”; they would be spreading new ideas and methods of discovery to the next generation, just as Europe did to them. This symbolism not only provides depth to Crevecoeur’s argument. It also vividly expresses his veneration toward Americans and their purpose in the New