Preview

Creationist Argument Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Creationist Argument Analysis
This debate would not change ones opinion either way. One asks you to have faith and believe that God created everything on Earth. The other relies on facts and science that can be measured and seen. As a person raised Atheist, I still believe that creationism is a fairy tale. Both scientists made their points using logical fallacies. As the viewer you can easily see the argument flaws in the person you disagree with. In the creationist debate Ken Hamm uses an appeal to authority by mentioning successful scientists who believe in creationism, such as the inventor of the MRI scanner and an Astronomer. He works hard to define terms differently, repeatedly in a circular argument. Only one thing in his debate made me pause, he discussed how the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Richard Dawkins Refute Creationism?
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Richard Dawkins Refute Creationism?

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Answers To Common Questions About Creation By Driscoll
    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Answers To Common Questions About Creation By Driscoll

    Historic Creationism correlates with my view as a Christian that the Bible is a poetic and historically accurate accounting of how we as humans came to be in this awe- inspiring world while holding to the scientific probability that the earth is billions of years old. Philosophers, theologians and lay people have forever debated creation, and I for one, believe there is room for more than one opinion. No one will know for sure until the day Jesus returns to shed his divine light on all his believers. Only then will the mystery of creation be…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    An Analysis of the Opinions Formed by Intelligent Design Supporters
    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    An Analysis of the Opinions Formed by Intelligent Design Supporters

    Intelligent design supporters have several opinions about evolution and their own theory. The opinions that are most commonly understood are the ones put forth by Thomas More Law and the Discovery Institute during the Dover trial. This trial focused on why intelligent design should be taught in classrooms. Evolution in the context of the trial and as declared by Charles Darwin is best described as the slow gradual genetic change of a population over time. The major underlying argument for intelligent design supporters is that the features of all organisms are too complex to have been simply caused by evolution (Koch). Since these features are too complex, supporters believe that there must have been a designer. They agree with evolution in some instances however. For example,…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurassic Park Argumentative Analysis
    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jurassic Park Argumentative Analysis

    Jurassic Park, a cult favorite, seems to be a scary work of fiction. What most do not realize is that there are efforts taking place right now to make the processes of reversing extinction a reality. This process, coined as ‘De-Extinction,’ is defined as using intact tissues of extinct animals to clone them and introduce them back into existing ecosystems. These efforts are taking place all over the world: the United States of America, Australia, Poland, and Russia. (Zimmer, 2013) This process includes taking fragmented DNA from preserved specimens, piecing the fragments together, placing the DNA in an emptied egg, and planting the egg in a female of similar lineage to the species being cloned. (Archer, 2013) The first attempt at this process was in 2003 when Spanish scientists attempted to clone the cells of the last Pyrenean ibex, Celia. The…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jw Apps Claim
    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jw Apps Claim

    A good example of this is the big question of how the earth and humans were created. According to Christians, the existence of us today is completely from God’s creation. However, if we discuss this with many scientists, you would altogether get a different viewpoint as they would most likely disagree with the Christian’s belief. This is because they have their own belief that we humans were created through evolution.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument Vs Experiential Argument Analysis
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    Cosmological Argument Vs Experiential Argument Analysis

    The Cosmological argument and the Experiential argument, I believe, are the most compelling evidence that God exists. The idea that something that begins must have a beginner or creator. That creator would have to be something that never begins. Saying that something that begins is not created from something is difficult to hold true. It may hold true if all the universe was just physical. Which would indicate that God would have to be physical and thus must have begun. But since God is spiritual then that would not work. The experiential argument is also a compelling argument because it shows people's experiences and the results are better people. Showing the causes is good because the end result is…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis
    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Creation Theory Declaration Of Independence
    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Creation Theory Declaration Of Independence

    “There are none who are as deaf as those who do not want to hear,” Barry Leventhal once said this quote (Geisler and Turek). There are so many different creation theories that people have been talking about them for centuries, none have been one hundred percent proven but all are debatable. The problem with most professionals who study creation theories is they are very stubborn. Once somebody has a plausible theory in their head they do not listen to any other theories. This quote by Barry Leventhal perfectly describes this characteristic of the professionals mentioned earlier. They are “deaf” because they refused to hear what others had to say. Many documents were written by these “deaf” professionals about their adopted theory; they…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richard Dawkins Analysis
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Richard Dawkins Analysis

    To begin in the video “Bill O’Reilly SCARED by Richard Dawkins” you see Bill O’ Reilly and Richard Dawkins going back in forth over the belief and evidence for god to exist. In the video you can see clearly that Richard Dawkins does not believe in a god and also tries to present facts to Bill as to why. Vice-versa you can clearly see that Bill O’ Reilly does belive in god and tries to convince Dawkins that god does exist. Now to go on to the main point, in my opion if W.K Clifford the famous English mathematician and philosopher were there he would not completely side with either on the topic, however I feel that he would most likely leen to the side with Richard Dawkins. Before going further into why, W.K Clifford was a man who was known to go against…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richard Dawkins Evolution
    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Richard Dawkins Evolution

    People want to know how it all began and how did we become the people that we are today. The ones that are asking these types of questions don’t necessarily understand physics, geology or astronomy and really don’t care about all of the debates. They want a truthful simple answer. As a Christian you need to be able to answer the questions on evolution or creation when they are presented to you. This paper is not a once and for all paper that will settle the bottom line but this paper will allow you to open your mind and to further your study into how much we do not know about the power of the…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Intelligent Design Argument Analysis
    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Intelligent Design Argument Analysis

    If you look at the world around us there is great evidence for an intelligent Designer. The evidence is overwhelming as we regard the world that God has created and how fine-tuned it is. For example, our bodies have been intricately designed to show that it was not an accident that we exist, but there’s evidence for a Creator. Not only are we able to look around with our eyes, but we are also able to study the fundamental constants and quantities and see how fine-tuned this universe is. Scientists conclude that the fundamental constants and quantities of the universe have been carefully dialed to an astonishingly precise value. It is so precise that it falls narrowly into a life-permitting range, showing that even if one of the numbers were…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nonbelievers Argumentative Analysis
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nonbelievers Argumentative Analysis

    Nonbelievers may have a right to be cynical if they visualize the wrong thing, and do not put the action into their vision. Simply picturing yourself winning a deal won’t guarantee it (Vanderkam, 2015). Focus your vision on what you can control. You have to believe in the Universal Power and understand the science of how the brain works. As an indivisible, you remain part of the great Universal Power! Does this mean that your thoughts can come true? Yes! Not all of them, only those that are focused, well-defined, and repeated often. When we visualize “It allows us to simulate reality at will, and, because of this, allows us to predict what we would experience in a specific situation or after we perform a specific action. This ability not only…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Creation Myth Essay
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Creation Myth Essay

    There are many different creation myths from different religions and different cultures. Two of the many creation myths are the creation myth of Genesis and the creation myth of India. Although these are both creation myths there are still some similarities and some differences between the two. The similarities between the Genesis and India creation myths are that both of the creators are benign and both of the Gods are supreme while the differences between them are that the reasons why man was created were different and the creations are accomplished in different ways.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Evolution
    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Evolution

    Have you ever thought about the things we teach at our public schools? How everything that is said to a student has an effect on the way they think or understand things. How are we sure that we teach them everything they need to know? And who decides the purpose or requirement of each class given? Education is to enlighten the young and naive to better their purpose in our society; and by teaching them both Evolution and Intelligent Design it give them more knowledge and a different way to look and examine things.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More