Preview

Court Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Review
Court Issues
Paul Thomson
CJA/394
March 4 2013
Jeffrey Hooker

Court Issues
As we all know that the world of the criminal is always changing and the Law enforcement community needs to change with it. The biggest one would be the courts. There are many things that face the courts today.
There are many issues facing the courts and the court administrator’s one problem is the use of plea bargaining in our court system. More than 90 percent of felony cases in the United States in any given year are disposed of via plea bargaining. When a criminal trial is tried this is away in determining the innocence or guilt of those in question, but when the plea bargain is used it is away for the accused to get a lesser sentence. In my option I think plea bargaining should only be used for lesser crimes. Because this is away for the accused to get out of the harsh sentence and get a less harsh sentence. The only thing with using the plea bargain less is that the courts are so understaffed and it would take so much longer for the courts to try a case. With the plea bargain it does help the overcrowded courts to get thru its cases.
The next thing would be the language problem with the courts. Within our country, there is an acceptance of immigration leading to more culture diversity calling for a need for more language interpretation services. “Language barriers and barriers erected by cultural misunderstanding can render criminal defendants virtually absent from their own court proceedings” (“The Increasing Importance of Language", n.d.). “This then intensifies the importance of court interpretation as a management issue for the courts, which are increasingly compelled to use language interpreters in court proceedings” (“The Increasing Importance of Language", n.d.). Language interpretation services are not used as much as they should be in the past. That is why we need to start using this service more in the future, because we have a very diverse culture and many



References: The Increasing Importance of Language. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ncsconline.org/wc/publications/Res_CtInte_ModelGuideChapter1Pub.pdf Center for Victims of Crime. (2009). About Victims Rights. General Overview. Retrieved from: http://www.victimlaw.info/victimlaw/pages/victimsRight.jsp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Issues

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The criminal justice system has changed tremendously over the decades and so has society. It is important that the court system make changes to keep up with the times. There are parts of the court system that need to be identified to have these changes occur. One of these areas is the way courts are managed including their problems and resolutions. A new trend that has emerged is victims’ rights. Victims can now intervene in the cases before sentencing. In the future, courts could lose cases to arbitration and mediation also known as the private sector of the courts. Understanding these changes and issues are important so that the courts can correspond with the trends as they occur. The courts are an important piece of the justice system. In order to meet the domains of the criminal justice system the courts evolve with the new processes and trends as they happen. Below the paragraphs will analyze and explore future management issues dealing with technological innovations and how the new technology is impacting the courts. Along with how victims’ rights are impacting the courts. One of the main issues that the courts are facing in the future is the possible division between the private law sector and the courts. The technological innovations also impacts the courts staff and judges.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a justice system replaces jury trials with plea negotiations it contradicts the fair rules of evidence in front of a judge or a jury. Plea negotiations are very different from the formal process. Criminals end up of facing sentences that are lighter while victims are left unsatisfied. Plea Bargaining is very private which can affect the outcome and will not benefit the everybody. While the bargain might help that receive less severe penalties than a conviction at trial, the bargain may still leave you with a criminal record that can have a huge affect in the future. For example, in Erma Stewart’s case after she chose to plea guilty her entire life changed. As she explained she could not afford to pay her probation fines due to the fact…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To keep up with the criminal problems in society, functions and components of the criminal justice system has to evolve in order to be able to detect and keep up with growing trends in society. New laws need to be created to help keep up with the evolution and its new trends. In this paper the evaluation of past, present, and future trends that connect to societies and the components of the criminal justice system will be discussed. It will also assess the recent and future contemporary issues that affect the criminal justice system. The purpose of this paper is to show that the criminal justice system has a major role in an ever changing society.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet, all these are reasons are unfair and can be bias towards an individual, especially the three one, because most of the times, a person is being forced to accepted the plea bargain either by threat (take the 3-5yr sentence, or get a 15-20yr sentence), or the defendant has to accept the plea because of financial hardships. This is way I feel we should get rid of plea bargains, because it is not doing what’s it is designed to do. Also, we are having more innocent individuals pleaded guilties, which the Innocent Project helped, proved that the plea bargains are bias and flawed. Plea bargains should only be accepted, if the defendant either caught red-hand, or after court cases, such as being find guilty, but decides to giving information to…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cja 394 Syllabus

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1.1 Evaluate past, present, and future trends in the interface between components of the criminal justice system and criminal justice connections with surrounding society.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would not really recommend any changes in the court system that we have now. I understand it is not a perfect system but it is better than many and it has the right goals in mind.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentence bargaining sometimes occurs in high profile cases where the prosecutor does not want to reduce the charges against the defendant, usually for fear of how the newspapers will react. A sentence bargain may allow the prosecutor to obtain a conviction to the most serious charge, while assuring the defendant of an acceptable sentence. I agree that we as a society should accept charge bargains to get more information out of a suspect. I do not agree that we should offer someone a sentence bargain. If the individual committed the crime then he/she should have to do the time. So, when Justice Stewart wrote in Blackledge v. Allison that plea bargaining "can benefit all concerned", I think that is only partly correct. Sure it benefits defendants, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges, but what about the victims or…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States court system runs smoothly due to plea bargaining because they push cases through without trial. Trials can take weeks and even months before they have a verdict. With ninety percent of cases being plea bargained it keeps court cases moving along. The United States court system is like a conveyer belt and plea bargaining is what keeps the conveyer belt moving so thing do not get backed up. Plea bargaining also benefits defendants by giving them a choice to plead guilty and take a lesser charge by giving up their right to a trial (Alschuler, 1968, p. 4). For those who the evidence clearly shows they are guilty they can chose a plea bargaining and get less time without wasting the court's time. Defendants who have families they need to support and are guilty of a crime can take a plea bargaining and can serve less time so they can get back to supporting their families sooner. Individuals can also give up their right to a trial by their peers in exchange for a guilty plea of a less serious offense or lesser charges making their criminal record better. They are minor first offenses where people can go without hiring a lawyer and instead accept a plea bargain and avoid going trial and paying for a lawyer. Many people make mistakes early in their life and plea bargains give those people a chance to reduce time served or charges by admitting to what they…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With that comes a lot of room for corruption to occur. Also with pressure being put on the public defender and prosecutors because of limited jail space it is hard for justice to be served. I believe that some stronger controls should be entered into the plea bargaining system. The plea bargaining system should be monitored more closely to watch for corruption in the system. Also to help the prosecutor and public defender to serve justice a little better there would need to be more holding facilities so that more criminals that deserved it would end up in…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargains are favorable in Herbert Packer’s crime control model of the criminal justice system, which resembles an assembly line (Roach 676-677). The least amount of time possible is spent on each of the accused in order to keep the constant stream of offenders flowing through the system. Instead of starting with a presumption of innocence, in a way there is a presumption of guilt that the offender has to address before reaching the position of a presumption of innocence. Of course it is impractical to just do away with plea bargaining and have a jury trial for every single person accused of a crime; there simply isn’t enough labor force and resources to support such an initiative (Devers 3). However, with 90 to 95 percent of people pleading guilty, prosecutors should stop using plea deals as a go to for every case that is brought to them (Devers 1). A starting point would be, at the very least, trying to restrict plea deals to defendants that can provide information or testimony that would lead to the conviction of a criminal. Or plea deals can be restricted with guidelines and only used for specific crimes (Devers 4). Another option would be to take a portion of discretionary power away from the prosecution. Some research has shown that prosecutors will push for harsher punishment if the defendant did not accept their plea deal (Devers 2). This works as a scare tactic and against anyone that is accused of a crime be they guilty or innocent. It is ridiculous that a defendant would be penalized for exercising their constitutional rights, simply because the prosecution wants them to accept the established presumption of guilt. It is possible that involving the judge and defense attorney or even a separate entity into the process would make it more of an equitable system (Devers 4). Taking any one of these measures would move…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays