In pondering
In pondering
This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…
| |A prosecutor is an attorney who has been elected or|The prosecution plays a very important role in the |…
While the public demand for the criminal justice system to help ensure a safe and secure environment, there are also occasions whereby the public may feel that the criminal justice agencies are actually the one posing unnecessary threats to the society. Issues like the abuse of authority, deadly vehicle pursuits and unauthorized use of weapons are all examples of cases in which the criminal justice system is actually threatening the safety of the public. This paper will discuss the case of Racin’ Ray’s Wild Day to examine the issues involved in the decisions made by Ripley as a law enforcing authority.…
Recently parole walker, Dimitrious Gargasoulas brutally ended the lives of six people during his infamous Bourke Street rampage. This tragedy has sparked widespread debate on Victoria’s bail system and the individuals who implement these laws. This is because, the sense of safety on the streets of Melbourne has been “ripped” apart due to this “horrific” incidence, causing Melbournians to feel “failed” by the judiciary system. Senator of Victoria and founder of the Justice Party, Derryn Hinch’s editorial ‘Bourke Street massacre: Victoria’s justice system fails again’ (Herald Sun 24/1/2017) plays on the fears of Melbournians to argue that the “power” should be “give[n] to the experts”, the police. Adopting a pessimistic yet passionate tone, the author seeks to evoke frustration and disappointment, instilling a need for change in the minds of Melbournians.…
Since the 19th century, law enforcement and punishment has developed rapidly into the justice system we rely on today. Obscure laws that had become irrelevant in an industrial and post-industrial era were fast being replaced, and despite its lack of existence at the beginning of the 1800’s, policing standards are, today, high. The necessity for this drastic change in approach to crime has stemmed from the needs of industrial Britain, and the increased awareness of the public, and government, and their perception of crime and punishment. Rather than individual cases having a direct impact on these changes, in general they provide an insight as to the reactions of the public at the time, and along with the myriad of other cases, allow us to develop an understanding of how attitudes towards crime and punishment changed.…
Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa are the defendant’s (O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs) representatives they are recommending the Court present an outline verdict to the bartender, John Daniels and O’Malley’s Tavern. There is definite understanding and helpful information defined in the Indiana Dream Shop Act which contains useful knowledge. Mr. Edward Hard did not participate or take on any behavior or actions that provided proof of intoxication. Debora White, the Plaintiff is in search of compensation from the defendants, O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs with the theory that Mr. Patrick Gibbs had concrete awareness of Mr. Edward Hard’s consumption of alcohol. (I.C. 7.1-5-10-15.5, 1996) cites that Mr. Gibbs the defendant have actual knowledge of the person being intoxicated before damages are allowed to be awarded. Practical awareness does not persuade the hindrance nor does individual awareness. Indirect evidence doesn’t support practical awareness only actual knowledge. Individual awareness can sustain the intrusion whereas actual knowledge has to carry through and support the intrusion. Observable dealings with the recognizable events of intoxication are prejudiced according to the 7th Indiana State Circuit Court. In the Supreme Court statue stated prior to the year 1988 common law tolerated practical awareness for intrusions and caused a change in the law for this not to be supported.…
"Scales Of Justice" shows the corruption in the police force. It is a fictitious portrayal of organised crime and human weaknesses in an unstated Australian location. It is about the possible abuses of power in the police force and is a study of power and its potential to corrupt. The drama is concerned with organised…
The Supreme Court has acted as a partisan political body instead of enforcing the constitution. Throughout the period of 1800 – 1830 the Marshall court was in order. Where John Marshall took over, and was high in most people’s eyes. Yet there was a major flaw. Most of his decisions in the court cases were bias, and more in favor of Federalist ideas and views. People are, by nature, bias. It takes remarkable training and will power to overcome ones natural prejudices.…
The dread tribunal of five Judges, Public Prosecutor, and determined Jury, sat every day. Their lists went forth every evening, and were read out by the gaolers of the various prisons to their prisoners. The standard gaoler-joke was, “Come out and listen to the Evening Paper, you inside there!”…
Courtney Lee, a 20-year-old woman, the defendant in this case, was charged with first degree felony for two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a 13-year-old boy , a minor, she was dating. The initial bond was set at $5000 for each count, under the compulsory condition that she not be allowed around any minors. The case was taken back to court because the defendant dishonored the mandate of her release by being…
Westervelt, Saundra; Humphrys, John (2001, June 1). Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice (Critical Issues in Crime and Society). Retrieved From:…
@When it comes picturing the criminal justice and its various administrations most people tend to believe that for the most part it is quite rigid and regulated as every procedure has to be followed down to the letter, but they would be surprised to find out how often formal structures, policies, and preferred practices are undermined by informal rules and group processes. The practice of informal rules and group processes allows criminal justice personnel to exercise more discretion when doing their jobs as some scenarios like minor offenses are not indicative for the need to arrest people and prosecute them. To analyze this in regards to the criminal justice system there are three key pointers that one should understand like why such informal practices exist, how they function in practice, and what variations exist in their application in police, courts, and corrections.…
The author’s purpose is to inform individuals that no human being takes birth as a criminal. Cases in which police, prison guards and other law enforcement authorities used excessive force or other tactics to violate victims’ civil right. It increased from fiscal years 1960’s, according to the Time Magazine. The composer’s primary audience is a prisoner. It made me think so because police brutality has been around since the police have been around. Although most people generally think of the highly publicized riots in the 1960s, police brutality occurred well earlier that and still happens currently. This form of police misconduct occurs when a police officer intentionally uses excessive force, and is usually physical rather than verbal. There are unfortunately many examples of police brutality that have happened over the past decades. The author’s secondary audiences might be prison guards. The writer…
The police staff and other officers concerned are not satisfied with the delayed and inefficient justice system, which is against the victim (Irving and Hilgendorf 1980). The research studies conducted in order to get the opinion of police officer showed that they did not consider the deterrence to be sufficient (Jackson 2012). Instead of that, they want the provision of efficient and ample terms of punishment for the offenders on the society. The police staff complains that the evidence and other significant information collected by them against the influential offenders are ignored during the trials in the courts (Hough 2010). There is a complaint of unnecessary adjournments in the courts, which delays the final decision making of the cases. The repetitive adjournments are done in order to provide opportunity to the defendants to make their cases stronger as compared to those of the…
This essay will discuss the differences in the ‘real’ courtroom, versus the ‘fictional’ courtroom, which is the depiction most of us are exposed to. In order to accurately compare the differences between the two different courtrooms, a brief summary of each must be presented. Once each of these is portrayed, an attempt to compare and contrast the two styles and the differences that exist between them can be discussed.…