Preview

Corporate Social Responsibility

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Social Responsibility
Tutorial 6 -- “The only role of business is the increase of profits”. Discuss.

Supporters of narrow view agree that the only role of business is the increase of profits. They believe that caring about the environmental, social and other problems should be the responsibility of government and non-profit making organizations sponsored by governments. (Pontinen J 2013 )

A bright supporter of the narrow view is Milton Friedman who claims that the only social responsibility a business has is to maximize the profits of its owner or shareholders. Friedman feels that as long as the corporate executive carries out these desires in a way that follows the laws and ethical customs of society, this person has fulfilled his or her duty for the society. Corporate executives are charged with earning and spending corporate money. If an executive chooses an agenda of social responsibility that is in direct conflict with the company’s agenda of profitability. They lack the nessary expertise to assign them non-economic responsibilities would be to place social welfare in the hands of inept custodians. Therefore, he only role of business is the increase of profits. (Pontinen J 2013 )

Another defender of narrow view in corporate social responsibility is famous economist Adam Smith, whose “invisible hand” argument states that if every member of society in a free market economy strives to promote his own economic interests they are led to promote the general good. Thus, corporations should not be held morally responsible for non-economic matters, to do so would distort the economic mission of business.( Dudovskiy 2012)

Conversely, the supporters of board view disagree that the only role of business is the increase of profits. The supporters of the broader view believe that profit is important but not means that the company does not has the duties or responsibility to the other. Businesses cannot make decisions which are made solely with economic point of view, because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Promoting a social justice may be justified, because it has been proven to create the competitive advantage by creating loyal employees, which directly leads to attaining loyal costumers. This may create an argument on flip side, that it may increase the administrative expenses which may also distracts the executive, as well as managers from their soul responsibility looking to increase the profits. This idea of profit maximization is well supported by the greatly Friedman, who particularly rejected the idea off business leaders articulating new visions that consider any business aspect than the profit maximizations them selves. The survey of corporate social responsibility research says, “ It creates administrative expenses, distracts executives, confuses economic goal, and subtracts from social welfare when the corporation is less efficient.” (The good company, 22)…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fin 111

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FIN111 Tutorial Solution Week 2 Ross Chapter 1 Critical Thinking and concepts review Chapter 1 1. Capital budgeting (deciding on whether to expand a manufacturing plant), capital structure (deciding whether to issue new equity and use the proceeds to retire outstanding debt), and working capital management (modifying the firm’s credit collection policy with its customers). Disadvantages: unlimited liability, limited life, difficulty in transferring ownership, hard to raise capital funds. Some advantages: simpler, less regulation, the owners are also the managers, sometimes personal tax rates are better than corporate tax rates. To maximise the current market value (share price) of the equity of the firm (whether it’s publicly traded or not). In the corporate form of ownership, the shareholders are the owners of the firm. The shareholders elect the directors of the corporation, who in turn appoint the firm’s management. This separation of ownership from control in the corporate form of organisation is what causes agency problems to exist. Management may act in its own or someone else’s best interests, rather than those of the shareholders. If such events occur, they may contradict the goal of maximising the share price of the equity of the firm. Since such organisations frequently pursue social or political missions, many different goals are conceivable. One goal that is often cited is revenue minimisation; i.e., providing their goods and services to society at the lowest possible cost. Another approach might be to observe that even a not-for-profit business has equity. Thus, an appropriate goal would be to maximise the value of the equity.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 1

    • 655 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The idea that businesses have a duty to serve society as well as the financial interest of stockholders is called…

    • 655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman criticizes business managers who engage in socially responsible behavior by using the argument that there is a different set of criteria for social responsible behavior of a person, who happens to be a corporate executive (businessman) versus that same person acting as an individual in a free-society. A business manager’s main responsibility is to maximize the profit of the corporation. When that person combines those roles and directs a corporation to take on a social responsible cause, because it would either increase cost or decrease revenue, it would be equivalent to a tax on the customers, shareholders and employees without their consent and in some cases, knowledge.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is overwhelming how corporations have embedded a social responsibility in their mission statements and company objectives. This leaves us with one assertion that is that corporations do have some level of obligation towards society’s morality; however, the corporation itself is not a moral agent (Klaus M. Leisinger). The discussion that follows is about corporations being moral agents or otherwise; however I will reach a conclusion that corporations do have an obligation that extends beyond obeying the law; evens so this obligation have been derived from the corporations quest for profit making. Corporation’s obligation…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What do you think about the social responsibility of businesses? Do you think they have certain social requirements or should the main objective of a business be to make money? This is a very in-depth and valid question in which both Milton Friedman and Robert Almeder have strong opinions. Although their opinions are polar opposite they have valid arguments. The objective is to analyze both opinions from their perspective point of views based on the examples given in the text. A mixture of both positions would provide a common ground for all people involved.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caprica Energy

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    investor's perspective, the purpose of the business is to maximize profits. But that's not the…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crux of the issue that Friedman tries to dissect is whether businesses acting socially responsible are effectively imposing a tax on those who invest their resources in such firms. Friedman’s argument centers around two ‘political questions’: whether firms have the appropriate mechanisms for determining the socially optimal use of resources, and whether corporations could recognize the repercussions that would arise from their decisions to assume social responsibilities. Friedman simplifies the two ideas into the argument of principle, and the argument of consequence. In answering both, Friedman determines that it is in the best interests for firms to maximize profits.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    busad 250 exam1 review

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role of Business in Society and potential positive and negative effects (Exhibit 4, p. 8)…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An organization focused on maximizing profits does not necessarily see social responsibility as important. Therefore, it generally only engages in socially responsible practices…

    • 966 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Ethics

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Friedman, M. (1997[1970]). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 56-61). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays