Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Extent of Disclosure: Evidence from Companies in Nepal
Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Extent of Disclosure:
Evidence from Companies in Nepal
Bikash Gajurel, Dinesh Pyatha, Ganesh Joshi, and Jyoti Kafle
Uniglobe College
Baneshwor, Kathmandu
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to investigate whether the existence of corporate governance mechanisms is effective in increasing the extent of disclosure amongst public listed companies in Nepal. Dscore index is prepared to collect data for the study. Regression analysis is used to determine the association between corporate governance mechanism and extent of disclosure level in Nepalese companies. This study reveals that the extent of corporate governance disclosure in larger companies is higher than small companies.
Introduction
The corporate governance is the process by which organizations are directed, controlled and held to account. This implies that corporate governance encompasses the authority, accountability, stewardship, leadership, direction and control exercised in the process of managing organizations. Since this definition recognizes the need for checks and balances in the process of managing organizations, it can be considered to be more comprehensive (Gregory, 2000). Moreover, it is similar to the definitions provided by the Audit Commission (2009) and CIPFA/SOLACE (Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy and the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives 2007) which emphasize the core aspects of accountability and control in the governance of organizations. Corporate Governance (CG) structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation such as, the board, managers, shareholders and stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs. It is the allocation of ownership, capital structure, managerial incentive schemes, takeovers, board of directors, pressure from institutional investors, product market competition, labor
Evidence from Companies in Nepal
Bikash Gajurel, Dinesh Pyatha, Ganesh Joshi, and Jyoti Kafle
Uniglobe College
Baneshwor, Kathmandu
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to investigate whether the existence of corporate governance mechanisms is effective in increasing the extent of disclosure amongst public listed companies in Nepal. Dscore index is prepared to collect data for the study. Regression analysis is used to determine the association between corporate governance mechanism and extent of disclosure level in Nepalese companies. This study reveals that the extent of corporate governance disclosure in larger companies is higher than small companies.
Introduction
The corporate governance is the process by which organizations are directed, controlled and held to account. This implies that corporate governance encompasses the authority, accountability, stewardship, leadership, direction and control exercised in the process of managing organizations. Since this definition recognizes the need for checks and balances in the process of managing organizations, it can be considered to be more comprehensive (Gregory, 2000). Moreover, it is similar to the definitions provided by the Audit Commission (2009) and CIPFA/SOLACE (Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy and the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives 2007) which emphasize the core aspects of accountability and control in the governance of organizations. Corporate Governance (CG) structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation such as, the board, managers, shareholders and stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs. It is the allocation of ownership, capital structure, managerial incentive schemes, takeovers, board of directors, pressure from institutional investors, product market competition, labor
References: Arun and Turner (2004), The corporate governance of banking institutions in developing economies. Barako, D.G., Hancock, P. & Izan, H.Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan Companies. Corporate Governance, 14 (2), 107 – 125. Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R. & Lapides, P.D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14 (4), 441 – 454. Bujaki, M. & McConomy, B.J. (2002). Corporate governance: Factors influencing voluntary disclosure by publicly traded Canadian firms. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 1 (2), 105 – 139. Chamlou, N., corporate governance : a framework for implementation, the world bank group Washington D.C.,(2000). Chau, G.K. & Gray, S.J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong andSingapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 247 – 265. Chen, C.J.P. & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285 – 310. Euclides Major And Ana Marques (2009) "IFRS Introduction, Corporate Governance And Firm Performance : Evidence From Portugal:, Jamar, Vol. 7 No.2. Pp. 55-70. Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 301 –325. Forker, J.J. (1992). Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22 (86),111 – 124. Ho, S.S.M. & Wong, K.S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 10, 139 – 156. Jensen, M.C and Meeking, Theory of the firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs, Ownership Structure, journal of fianancial economics, vol.3 (oct. 1976) 305-60. Jensen, M.C and Meeking, W., Theory of the firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs, Capital Structure, journal of fianancial economics, 48,3, (1976) 949-974. Murphy, k., corporate performance and managerial remuneration: an empirical analysis, journal of accounting and economics vol. 1 (april), 1085, 11-42. Murphy k. and Zimmerman, j., financial performance surrounding CEO turnover; journal of accounting research, vol.28. (sep. 1993), 55-56 Radhae S Stephen Y.L. Cheung and Bob Y. Chan (2004)” Corporate Governance in Asia”, Asia Pacific Development Journal, Vol.11.No.2, December 2004, pp.1-31. Sunday O. Kajola(2008), “Corporate Governance and firm Performance: The case of Nigerian Listed Firms”, European Journal of Economics and, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Issue 14, Euro Journals. Inc., www.eurojournals.com pp.16-28. Sung Wook Joh (1997): The Korean Economic Crisis and Governance System, A paper presented in 12th Annual NBER seminar on the East Asian Economics, pp.129-152. Wan Izyani Adilah Wan Mohammad, (2010) Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Extent of Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Companies in Malaysia, International Business Research Vol. 3, No. 4 APPENDEX