Coontz Summary
Summary
In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if we lived our life with multiple spouses. In other cases, love was developed after marriage, but was not a necessity. In most cases today, love is a necessity for marriage. Why all of a sudden is there a change?
In the article, Coontz tells us how the definition has changed over the past hundred years. ”Love” used to only be used for a mistress, or in todays terms, side-chick in some cultures. Now it is a strong affection between people who are in a ROMANTIC relationship.
Summary
In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if
In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if we lived our life with multiple spouses. In other cases, love was developed after marriage, but was not a necessity. In most cases today, love is a necessity for marriage. Why all of a sudden is there a change?
In the article, Coontz tells us how the definition has changed over the past hundred years. ”Love” used to only be used for a mistress, or in todays terms, side-chick in some cultures. Now it is a strong affection between people who are in a ROMANTIC relationship.
Summary
In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if