Conservativism, Vegetarianism, And Progressivism

Four major political ideologies dominate society: Conservativism, Libertarianism, Liberalism, and Progressivism. These ideologies substantially influence the human services field, both in its implementation and progression, as well as, in its reduction. In viewing these vastly differing ideologies, one must look at the underlying beliefs of each one to understand how they influence, alter, and develop the human services field while also attempting to decide which is superior. In order to understand each ideology, their stances on both equality and the free market shall be discussed. This will allow one to properly demonstrate and understand how their followers think, and how their beliefs influence and affect the human services field.
Libertarians
(Harrison, et al., 2003b, p. 178-179) In terms of equality, a Conservative views society as an organic entity which has a natural social hierarchy: “Conservatives see nothing wrong in a hierarchy based on birth, wealth, authority… Conservatives see, therefore, a natural inequality among people in society; caused by the wide and unequal distribution of talents among people.” (Harrison, et al., 2003b, p. 180) Thus, to a Conservative, trying to equalize the social status of members of society is a futile effort. Conservatives, though not initially, are also strong proponents of the free market, seeing it as an essential prerequisite for other freedoms. (Harrison, et al., 2003b, p. 184-185) However, Conservatives tend to acknowledge the need for government intervention in times of market failure (ex. Depressions/recessions). Ultimately, Conservative policy seeks to strike a balance between an unfettered market and limited social security. When it comes to human services, Conservatives believe that a welfare state, that seeks to reduce the inequality among members of society, is a fruitless effort that would only encourage social problems by creating a “… socially irresponsible and dependant underclass.” (Harrison, et al., 2003b, p. 184; Feulner, 1999) Most Conservatives would contend that though it would be unwise to provide no social services, the assistance provided should be intended for the short-term and should be made available to those deemed as the “deserving poor”. (Feulner, 1999; Lightman, p. 72-74) Nonetheless, Conservatives do believe that there is a larger role to be played in the private sector when it comes to human services. (Harrison, et al., 2003b, p. 183; Lightman, p. 63) They believe it is up to the elite to provide an example and aid/empower those in need, and for communities, families, charities, and