Consequences Of Republic Act No. 10076
According to Republic Act No. 10066 in section 48 letter A and B state that “Section 48. Prohibited Acts. - To the extent that the offense is not punishable by a higher punishment under another provision of law, violations of this Act may be made by whoever intentionally:
(a)Destroys, demolishes, mutilates or damages any world heritage site, national cultural treasures, important cultural property and archaeological and anthropological sites;
(b)Modifies, alters, or destroys the original features of or undertakes construction or real estate development in any national shrine, monument, landmark and other historic edifices and structures, declared, classified, and marked by the National Historical Institute as such, without the prior written …show more content…
That the private landowners are legally required to pay informal settlers "disturbance compensation" prior to eviction. There is nothing wrong if private landowners voluntarily give some financial assistance to the squatters on their land when they are evicted and their dwellings demolished.
That socialized housing always includes a house and lot. Socialized housing could be in the form of the lot only, or house only, as in the case of medium- or high-rise building, and not necessarily house and lot. However, it is good if the law amends to expand the meaning of socialized housing to include house and lot in case of a row, duplex, or single detached houses.
That the government has to provide free housing to the squatters or that squatters are entitled, as a matter of right, to free housing. After the World War II, hundreds of thousands of families have been feeling the strain of housing problems and relocation in Metro Manila. If one does not own the land he possesses, he has limited rights. According to the MMDA’s records, Metro Manila had 2.8 million (556, 526 families) “squatters” in
(a)Destroys, demolishes, mutilates or damages any world heritage site, national cultural treasures, important cultural property and archaeological and anthropological sites;
(b)Modifies, alters, or destroys the original features of or undertakes construction or real estate development in any national shrine, monument, landmark and other historic edifices and structures, declared, classified, and marked by the National Historical Institute as such, without the prior written …show more content…
That the private landowners are legally required to pay informal settlers "disturbance compensation" prior to eviction. There is nothing wrong if private landowners voluntarily give some financial assistance to the squatters on their land when they are evicted and their dwellings demolished.
That socialized housing always includes a house and lot. Socialized housing could be in the form of the lot only, or house only, as in the case of medium- or high-rise building, and not necessarily house and lot. However, it is good if the law amends to expand the meaning of socialized housing to include house and lot in case of a row, duplex, or single detached houses.
That the government has to provide free housing to the squatters or that squatters are entitled, as a matter of right, to free housing. After the World War II, hundreds of thousands of families have been feeling the strain of housing problems and relocation in Metro Manila. If one does not own the land he possesses, he has limited rights. According to the MMDA’s records, Metro Manila had 2.8 million (556, 526 families) “squatters” in