Preview

Congress And The Impeachment Process

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Congress And The Impeachment Process
The United States of America is known as a land of equals and a land “of the free.” From separation of powers to check and balances, the Founding Fathers displayed a desire for equilibrium, rather than for usurpation. Although the three branches of government display equality, the development of the legislative branch over time- i.e. the shift of delegation powers- has shown that Congress holds the most power making final decisions through impeachment, oversights, and accepting or denying presidential requests- i.e. treaties and the appointment of judges. Within two centuries, Congress, considered as the “boss” of the executive and judiciary, has transformed into the nation’s instrumental powerhouse. Under Article I of the United States (U.S) …show more content…
According to Article II Section 4, Congress can impeach “a president, vice president, and other executive officials” (pg 241) on account of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes” and bring the individual to court to determine whether he or she is guilty or not. Furthermore, an impeachment is analogous to a criminal indictment, and the House of the Representatives is the “grand jury,” which demonstrates that the judiciary branch cannot be involved in the impeachment process, but rather, the person who is accused of the charges and Congress is present during the process. The House of the Representatives votes on whether or not an executive officer is worthy of impeachment, and the House, through majority rule, determines whether or not a trial will occur in the Senate. The Senate, through a two-thirds majority rule, decides on a conviction and a forcible removal of the individual from office. Subsequently, the impeachment process substantiates Congress’ power over the executive branch by demonstrating the power of the final word on any executive officer, especially the president. For example, in 1974, the House of Representatives embarked on impeachment of President Richard Nixon, due to the Watergate Scandal; however, fearing the publicity, Richard Nixon resigned from office, before the impeachment was fully underway. …show more content…
Although bureaucracies, or institutions that “deliver government goods efficiently” (pg. 309), are responsible for implementing a legislation passed by Congress, Congress maintains control through oversights- when committees and subcommittees follow bureaucratic implementations of the piece of legislation passed. Specific committees and subcommittees have specific “oversight powers” over specific bureaucratic agencies in the executive branch, and there are committees are in the House and in the Senate that can oversee other agencies that are not in their jurisdiction. Therefore, the implementation of oversight is greatly evident through public hearings, during which agencies in the executive branch and additional individuals present and protect their data. A committee and subcommittee hearing in 2012 regarding the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, involved the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of State, both of which were interrogated for deaths of several individuals, including the U.S. Ambassador and four Americans, and for “the destruction of the facility” due to their inability to maintain security. Thus, each agency holds a responsibility to the Congress to display all resources in order to maintain its life; accordingly, Congress’ immense power is even more distinguishable by the ability to apply “the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US federal legislature is bicameral, therefore it consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and in theory they should both be of equal power. However, in reality it is the Senate which is considered to hold the most power, although there are arguments to in favour of them having equal rights. In order to reach a balanced judgement I will consider both sides of the argument, beginning with the claim that the Senate is more powerful than the House of Representatives.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impeachment of President Andrew Johnson was a dramatic event in politics for the United States. It was a long battle between the Southern Democrat and the Republicans. On February 24, 1868 he was impeached in the House of Representatives on eleven articles detailing his high crimes and misdemeanors. The Tenure of Office Act that was passed by congress a year before was the primary charge. He removed Edwin M. Stanton the Secretary of War and replaced him with Ulysses S. Grant. On March 2 the house agreed to the articles and the trial began three days later in the senate. The final tally of votes was one fewer than the two thirds needed. The trial ended in an acquittal which means President Johnson was not guilty of the crime he was accused of.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov, Congress Essay

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fiorna also argues that the growth of an activist federal government has sparked major change in congressional activities as less and less effort is spent on actual lawmaking and an ever increasing amount on pork barreling and casework. Congress is itself creating a centralized, highly un-participatory government which results in “Congress does not just react to big government, it creates it”. According to Fiorna Congress would rather work hard to get reelected rather than make actual laws which often involve difficult decisions and can result in political enemies. All the problems evident with a centralized government are present in Congress.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the course of the history of the United States of America, two presidents, Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, have officially been impeached. The U.S. Constitution protects the right to impeach public officials, with the process being outlined in Article I, Sections 2 and 3, while in Article II, Section 4, indicates the grounds for impeachment by stating that, "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors” (Halstead) Since 2010, Republican congress members have made it clear that they believe Barack Obama should be impeached and removed from office. Efforts to do so have been little until December 2013 when there was a hearing on Obama called by the House Judiciary committee, formally called "The President 's Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute…

    • 2221 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 our founding fathers gathered in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia, in the exact same room our Declaration of Independence had been signed a few years prior. This group of men was faced with the immense task of drafting the Constitution of the United States of America. Our founding fathers showed such brilliant foresight in how they structured this foundational document by recognizing the need for a Constitution designed to keep our government regulated. We will be exploring different facets within the structure of the Constitution, looking closely at some of those regulations such as Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Through this exploration we will come to understand the importance of these aspects, why they are so…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Current Power of the Branches of Our Federal Government An Opinion Brandon Parrish Fairmont State University…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans in today's society will find it difficult to answer the question of what Congress exactly does and why it exists. Others simply don't care and see Congress as a failed system where nothing gets done. Lee Hamilton, in his book Why Congress Works and Why you Should Care, proves these people wrong and gives an insider's look at what Congress actually does do and how it affects every American each day.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal. Most references to impeachment,…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America and Congress

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In "If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?" author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Based on prior experience, the framers of our Constitution understood the value of dispersing power and authority amid the assorted governing divisions in order to circumvent corruption. For this reason, a process of checks and balances was written into our system to guarantee that no singular branch of government became too powerful. The perception of balance in our administration, however, deserves scrutiny from time to time, as a few historical events have revealed dubious legal concepts embedded in our system. These events force us to question and inspect certain actions taken by government officials and the Judiciary alike. The internment of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War is one such example. By tracing this historical event, we are able to examine how the respective powers of the President and the Supreme Court interplay - for better or for worse - and how they are put into action.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point it was expected, that the Congress would pass laws, the President would execute them, and the Supreme Court would interpret them in individual cases. This was the framework for the Separation of Powers; established by the Constitution, and stuck to it for the greater part of our history. The Founding Fathers were well-acquainted with a long-held tenet of government: the accumulation of power by a single person or body of government is the greatest threat to liberty. In fact, a celebrated feature of the…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays