Preview

Conflicting Absolutism Vs Antinomianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicting Absolutism Vs Antinomianism
Your post is very informative. I too discussed antinomianism so I wanted to comment on the second ethical system you chose: conflicting absolutism.
Conflicting absolutism is one of the viable ethical models for Christians. The system contends that moral decisions can involve an obligation to fulfill two or more absolute norms that are mutually exclusive. So if a Christian chooses one norm, the norm rejected is still a moral obligation, and the Christian has to repent for not choosing it. For example, a polygamist, in countries where this is legal, who becomes a Christian and decide to divorce one of the spouse so he can only have one as prescribed in the Bible, has to repent for the divorce (Bradshaw, 2002).
Conflicting absolutism recognizes
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran
    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DBQ on Absolutism
    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ on Absolutism

    European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism vs Constutionalism
    • 1692 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Absolutism vs Constutionalism

    During the 17th century, France and England moved in two very different political directions. By the close of the century, after decades of civil and religious strife, ENGLAND had developed into a CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH with a policy of RELIGIOUS TOLERATION. By contrast, FRANCE developed an ABSOLUTIST, CENTRALIZED FORM OF GOVERNMENT dominated by a monarchy that shared little power with any other national institutions and prohibited all religions but ROMAN CATHOLICISM.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Enlightened Absolutism
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Enlightened Absolutism

    Enlightenment was the prevailing thought of this era which called for reform, but most believed that the best way to affect change would be through the ruler. Government officials who had the ear of the ruler would instruct them to reform their Government to improve human society. Which resulted in what historians called enlightened absolutism. The new ways of thinking had several effects on both the Monarchical Absolutism and those under its rule. For example, sweeping reforms happened in Prussia, Russia and Austria changing the quality of life for the people for the better. However, even Enlighted Absolutism has its limits as we with the persecution of the Jewish people.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism Vs Paternalism
    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    Absolutism Vs Paternalism

    Britain and the United States preferred indirect control whereas most other European countries and France wanted to have direct control. Indirect control has a couple of different ideas which included: the user of local government officials, there was limited self-rule, the main goal was to develop future leaders, and the government institutions were based on many European styles. There was a legislative council which included colonial officials and professionals nominated by the governor for each individual colony(s). Direct control on the other hand consisted of the opposite ideas of indirect control. The French and Europeans much rather wanted direct control which led this country to the idea of a policy called paternalism. Women in Africa…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Review of Carson's Gagging of God
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Review of Carson's Gagging of God

    The Christian must recognize empirical pluralism, tolerate cherished pluralism, but reject philosophical pluralism. We must recognize the diversity that exists in modern culture as Christians have throughout history. While pluralism poses new challenges in the current day, Christians have always had to stand up for the truth of Christian believe against other religions. Scripture was both inspired and written in a pluralistic context. However, even in the Old Testament God insisted that his people turn from the worship of other gods and other religions. For example, in Joshua 24:15, Joshua gave the children of Israel a choice to either serve God or Baal. The prophet Elijah would later give Israel the same choice in 1 Kings 18:21. Throughout history, God’s people have been reminded to be faithful to God as…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christian Worldview And Ethical Dilemma
    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Christian Worldview And Ethical Dilemma

    Our worldviews are redefined over time, and that worldview dictates how we react and interact with the world around us. It becomes particularly important when faced with any ethical dilemmas. When we are faced with a dilemma that challenges our ability to uphold our worldview, it either strengthens our resolve or requires a reevaluation of what that worldview is. The abortion dilemma bellow will be used to examine how a Christian worldview would resolve an ethical dilemma and compare that resolution to my own worldview…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    What the Bible Says About Abortion by Steve Cole
    • 3668 Words
    • 15 Pages

    What the Bible Says About Abortion by Steve Cole

    Some who call themselves “evangelicals” argue that since the New Testament does not directly address the matter, we should not be dogmatic about it. They say that it is a “difficult moral issue,” where we need to allow room to differ and not impose our personal views on others. Many evangelical pastors refrain from speaking on the subject because it is controversial and potentially divisive. And many pastors dodge it because they have drifted from the Bible as the source of absolute moral truth.…

    • 3668 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Enlightened Absolutism Analysis
    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Enlightened Absolutism Analysis

    Enlightened absolutism was not a contemporary term to the European rulers it now describes. Consequently, interpretations of enlightened absolutists vary and are dependent on the time of analysis. The term was developed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and since then its interpretation has evolved. The idea of enlightened absolutism, however, was observed and the principles were familiar in the second half of the eighteenth century among certain rulers. At first, the term was only applied to German speaking lands, but has since expanded geographically and to include French and Italian Enlightenment philosophy as well as German cameralism in its influences. The perceived benefits and faults of this style of ruling have transformed…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Calvinism
    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Absolutism Vs Calvinism

    A wise man once said that everything is about sex, except for sex, which is about power. This may be perhaps a liberal analogy, but it is true that the inception of modern divorce in John Calvin’s Geneva is grounded in both the Protestant view on human sexuality as well as its sensibilities in maintaining order and authority. Both religious and political authorities saw the value in dissolving unhappy unions, for reasons of procreation as well as a means of maintaining authority. On the one hand, these divorces were groundbreaking in that they allowed for remarriage, but the strict circumstances with which one is allowed to obtain a divorce, as well as unintended prejudices against the lower classes and women, assured that the Calvinist…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism
    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dbq on Absolutism

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Academic Study of the New Testament
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Academic Study of the New Testament

    On the other hand, a theological confessional approach is based on what one believes to be true. By taking this approach one is more concerned about their actions, the ultimate meaning of life, who God really is, and so forth. This approach to the New Testament results in controversial issues, biased opinions, and many different groups of believers with their own beliefs as seen from the ancient world up to the present modern day. We read about this very diversity in chapter one, for example the Jewish-Christian Adoptionists, Marcionite Christians, Gnostic Christians, and the Proto-Orthodox Christians.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism Vs Relativism
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism Vs Relativism

    Thoreau would have thought that the government should preserve the liberty of citizens because of all his references to people's freedom. He constantly brings up the fact that he thinks the government shouldn't control everything the people do. He wants the people to be in control of themselves and by doing this, it would make everyone happier which would result in a more calm environment for the government. If the citizens are happy, then the government won't have to deal with all the drama of people not liking how they are being treated or “controlled.” The people would be able to control their individual selves which would makes the government's job easier. The government would have responsibilities but less control of the citizens lives.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Absolute And Absolute
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Difference Between Absolute And Absolute

    Instead absolutism neglects different circumstances along with cultural attitudes, cannot have a clear idea of its morals as no one can state them or knows them, also it is not concerned with the motive or outcome of any actions. However, it does provide a universal vision to measure everything against, creating fairness as everyone would get the same punishment or reward, providing us with a UN Declaration of Human Rights, also in certain circumstances people instinctively have an absolutist attitude; for example cruelty to babies is wrong. On the other hand relativist judgments are always subjective, decreasing the fairness as people might have different losses or benefits because of their actions, people will also disagree on each other’s judgments. This view also stops social development; an example of this would be genocide which should be considered wrong but from a relativist vision it would be analysed depending on circumstances and goals, the holocaust would be an example of this. It is also more complicated to apply than absolutism as there would not be a fixed…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    R. V. Keegstra : in Support of the Dissent
    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages

    R. V. Keegstra : in Support of the Dissent

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics