Preview

Competency To Stand Trial Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
694 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Competency To Stand Trial Essay
1. Before a court is permitted to allow a criminal defendant to stand trial, plead guilty, or waive constitutional rights, the court must be satisfied that the defendant is competent to engage in any of these activities. What is meant by competency? Describe the legal standard for determining competency to stand trial and waive rights in a criminal case.
When the court mentions the word competency, they mean that the defendant should be able to understand the court system enough to be able to represent themselves or appoint counsel to help them engage in these activities. The defendant’s competency has to be tested before the trial can be completed. It is determined by asking two questions: does the defendant understand that he or she has been charged with a crime and faces government punishment if convicted and is the defendant capable of assisting in his or her defense.
2. What is the difference between jurisdiction and venue?

Jurisdiction is the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area and/or over certain types of legal case. Venue is the particular county or geographical area in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine a case.

3. Discuss the similarities and
…show more content…
They can also grant immunities to compel a witness to testify. Grand jury proceedings are conducted in secrecy and are non adversarial. In preliminary hearings, probable cause is determined by the magistrate. It differs from grand jury proceedings in that they are a formal adversarial proceeding. Preliminary hearings have no subpoena power unlike grand jury proceedings. Grand jury hearings the defendant doesn’t have to be present, has no right to counsel or offer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Jackson, the Appellate, was a mentally deficient deaf. He wasn’t able to read, write or communicate. The Appellate was charged with robbery of two different women. Appellant robbed the women for four and five dollars respectively. Appellant was found to be incompetent to stand trial at an incompetency hearing. The Court ordered Appellant to be committed until he was competent to stand trial.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CarrieWhite unit6 Seminar

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then you went over jurisdiction of a court refers to those in cases in which it may exercise lawful authority which is determined by statute or constitution. The question that you asked I honestly think that answer would be yes. Then you went over the state court system many differences among state courts which use three tiered structure which are trial courts of limited jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The authority of a court to hear and decide cases is called the jurisdiction. When a case is first brought to court is the authority of the original jurisdiction. When there is an error of law and the courts need to review the case, they will go to the appellate jurisdiction. When the court has the power to hear any case, this is called general jurisdiction. Special jurisdiction is where the court has the authority to hear exceptional circumstances. A particular…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The basic outline for competency to stand trial is for a person to be aware of the proceedings, know what they are being charged with, and the ability to interact with attorney to work on their own defense. This seem like a simple and easy task to take place, but each year numerous people are unaware of what is happening to them when they are arrested and brought in for initial hearing. Competency is something that can easily be missed if not addressed early on, once noticed the attorney or prosecution may ask for a competency evaluation. The judge holds the decision in his hand but once the issue of competency is raised it would be…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American court system sometimes calls on forensic psychologists to determine the fitness of a defendant to stand trial. This paper specifically looks at the defendant amnesia as criteria for determining competency. Specifically, the author first investigates the psychological standards for determining competency and conducts a literature review of relevant research that may guide the forensic psychologist in making a determination. Next, the paper examines the legal standards for determining competency, including established precedents. The author lives in Indiana, so that state 's statutes as well as federal standards are discussed. The paper then discusses whether the professional standard and the legal standard are compatible and finally outlines the role of the forensic psychologist in the competency hearing process.…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice Brennan’s opinion in, In re Winship, explicitly recognized the reasonable doubt standard for criminal defendants. 7 That opinion elevated the protection associated with the longstanding application of the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal prosecutions to constitutional status.8 After Winship, as a general rule, under the due process clauses of both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the prosecution must prove to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, every fact necessary to constitute the crime, the state has charged the defendant.9 The Supreme Court has struggled, however, over the past three decades to find the precise contours of this constitutional protection. Despite repeated attempts, the Supreme Court continues to struggle to find the appropriate balance between protecting defendant rights10 and ensuring legislative autonomy in the drafting of criminal statutes.11 The long line of Sixth Amendment cases considering which factual questions must be resolved by juries beyond a reasonable doubt and which questions may be resolved by judges by a preponderance of evidence “has produced a bewildering series of distinctions.”12…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purpose Of The Grand Jury

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The purpose of the Grand Jury is to hear evidence against an accused person (or persons) and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial” (Worrall, 2016, p. 184). In other words, whether or not there is enough probable cause to indict a person of a felony crime or in cases of “great public or political significance” (Worrall, 2016, p. 186). The Grand Jury has significant investigative power and “in some case’s is able to issue an indictment faster than preliminary hearings” (Worrall, 2016, p. 186). It also provides a tremendous amount of privacy for the members of the Grand Jury and certain witnesses.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ensure that all persons who so require receive competent legal representation and interpretation at all stages of the criminal justice…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Every individual is afforded the right to counsel in criminal proceedings. It is the liability of the government to provide every defendant facing criminal charges with legal representation that also is considered sufficient (2011). The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every individual the right to a swift and public trial from an unbiased jury of his or her peers in the state or district in which the crime was committed in (1995-2011). The district should have been beforehand established by law, and to be educated of the nature and reason for the charge, the right to face the eyewitness in opposition of him or her, to have necessary process for gathering eyewitnesses in his or her support (1995-2011). Last, the Sixth Amendment affords and individual the right to have the aid of an attorney for his or her defense (1995-2011). The last statement of the Sixth Amendments establishes that every individual has a right to counsel from the very second he or she is placed in police confinement (2011).…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To determine the mental status and competency of an individual, one must spend time to question and study the person, definitely spend more than 10 minutes with the patient. Many laws have been established and put into place to protect the young, the old, the innocent and the mentally ill. Trial competence is different from being criminally responsible for your actions. Trial competence refers to the current ability of the defendant to understand and participate in the trial process. The United States Constitution states that a person accused of a crime must be given the opportunity to appear and be present at his trial as well as to face their accuser. The physical presence of oneself is not sufficient or acceptable to be tried in court, a defendant must be mentally present as well. Specific criteria’s vary from state to state and federal jurisdiction but is all similar in the fact that if a defendant does not understand the charges being brought against himself, the proceedings that are taking place, or the ultimate outcomes of the trial, than he will not be able to reasonable assist in his own defense, in which he will be considered to be incompetent to stand trial.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Rights During Trial

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Legal rights during a trial can be very important to the defendant in a case. These rights provide a lot of different options so that they can have their own choices about the case. All of these rights are in the 6th amendment to help the defendant in trial. I am going to discuss to you 4 of 8 different right for a defendant. The four I am going to be discussing are as follows, the right to confront witnesses, the right to counsel at trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to a public trial.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays