Preview

Comparison Of Punishment And Circumstance Of An Individual Crime

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of Punishment And Circumstance Of An Individual Crime
Nowadays the most important discussion topic is fixed punishment for each type of crime. It is often argued that this is a positive development whereas other people disagree and they think that it should decide to according to circumstance of an individual crime. I think that the best way of the punishment is according to crime. This essay will discuss both points of view before coming to a reasoned conclusion. It is clear that motivation for committing it and circumstance of an individual crime should be taken into when deciding. Deciding of a punishment is not easy period. The criminal laws have to provide minimum and a maximum punishment. It means ; every people don’t punish same penalty. For instance, person ,who are sentenced to kill
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to Fuhrer
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How to Fuhrer

    The need for harsher sentencing in law reform may appease the needed features of punishment, but stricter penalties have not been proven to show reduced crime rates and then follows in seeking to promote social values for harsher sentancing undermining us our social value for fairness and the idea of justice to the individual…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Incarceration Between The Rehabilitation And The Punitive Model
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Incarceration Between The Rehabilitation And The Punitive Model

    The punitive model has beneficial aspects such as the severity of crime and having a strict layout of punishment, but there are a few ethical issues within this model. This model has increased incarceration rates, which has creating a safer society, nonetheless, in return it is causing issues with overcrowding and lack of funding’s. This part of the new model would incorporate the strict punishments ideas, but to an extent. This type of punishment would be directed towards individuals who were guilty of serious crimes such as domestic violence, rape, other forms of sexual offenses, murder (all degrees), attempted murder, and kidnapping. These types of crimes are much more severe and require punitive punishment due to the fact that these individuals have a slim chance of being released into society and the rehabilitation program will not benefit society.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bedau's Justification Of Punishment
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bedau's Justification Of Punishment

    a general system of punishment, the punishment of specific persons, and the specific type (and amount) of punishment to be imposed in a given scenario (Duff). With respect to the first component, which he called the “general justifying aim” of the system of punishment (Duff), there are several purposes for instituting a penal system; the most common of which are general deterrence, specific deterrence, incarceration/incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. While it is easy to see how each of these can be beneficial and justify the general punishment system in the abstract, upon closer examination the existence of multiple underlying justifications…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper
    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why The Punishment Should Match The Criminal
    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain Why The Punishment Should Match The Criminal

    In the oldest written legal code “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” is the general rule regarding punishment for crimes committed. The punishment should match the crime. Today, our criminal justice system contains this same basic principle: the severity of the crime generally matches the severity of the punishment in terms of number of years served, fines imposed or community service hours required. It’s time to throw out the Hammarabi Code and modernize. An updated legal code should be based on the question “whose committing the crime?” The United States prison system is in need of dramatic overhaul because our prisons are overcrowded and inhumane. In determining how to deal with…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sentencing Paper
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Sentencing Paper

    In our society sentencing plays a big part in our criminal justice system. Not only does it plays a big part but it helps to deter and reduce crime to help keep our street safe from those that want to cause us harm. In this paper we will begin to analyze the various forms of sentencing that are used along with their rational. The impact of tough sentencing giving handed out to criminals. The eighth amendment and its relationship to capital punishment and how they come together when it has to do with sentencing. In to wrap things up if the death penalty should be abolished for good. All in which would be covered and explained to give a better understand of sentencing.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Punishment And The Criminal Justice System
    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Punishment And The Criminal Justice System

    Punishment is our current most exercised consequence for bringing justice to those victims of criminals by incarcerating offenders in a jail or prison, as well as other forms such as the community service, probation, and even the death penalty. While jail and/or prison life is necessary to protect the public by confining criminals away from public harm, I believe that “only” punishing dangerous criminals is simply not enough.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Effects of Punishment and Sentencing
    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Effects of Punishment and Sentencing

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Punishment Philosophies
    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Punishment Philosophies

    The universality of justice is a predominant concern of any nation that strives for true democracy, and in the U.S., this pursuit is largely undertaken in the court system. If the general basis for an action to constitute a crime lies in the willful and unsanctioned dispossession of another's life, liberty, or property, then the punitive power of the state to deprive the transgressor of these same rights, in the name of justice, must be exacted with a similar degree of concern. To this end, a variety of punishment philosophies, giving differing weight to the interests of victims, criminals, and society, have developed to clarify the notion, and to influence the practice of justice. While the philosophies of deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, retribution, and restoration can be perceived to prioritize the considerations of victims and society, the handling of youth offenders in juvenile courts, as well as the appellate process, are expressions of consideration for the accused. It is largely agreed upon that punishment for the sole purpose of vengeance is detrimental to the ideals of justice and civility.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rehabilition
    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Rehabilition

    This paper will debate the effectiveness of punishment compared with the effectiveness of rehabilitation of convicted offenders in prison. It will do so by addressing the following points: the effect on deterrence of crime, the effect on victims and victim’s families, the effect on the offender, the social effect on society and the fiscal effect on society.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process Model 1
    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due Process Model 1

    This paper will be about crime control model versus the consensus and due process model. In this paper we will discuss the following what role does law enforcement play in these policies, What roles do the prosecutor and courts play in these policies, What role do corrections play in these policies.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Should people convicted of minor crimes do community service rather than go to prison?”
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Should people convicted of minor crimes do community service rather than go to prison?”

    Over the centuries, punishments for different criminals are subject of great consideration. Weather it’s a punishment for a serious crime like murder, or a low intensity crime like abusing a man, there is always a hot debate, among law makers, social workers & layman citizens. People convicted for minor crimes are treated the same way as for major crimes convicts. I firmly believe, criminals with minor crimes should have a different law & enviornment for punishment. Although, it’s a matter of hot debate, yet I am illustrating some facts.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics