Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Due Process Model 1

Satisfactory Essays
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Due Process Model 1
Policy Analysis III—Compare and Contrast Paper
Toshua White
CJA/ 464
Mr. Patrick Clayton
May 27, 2015

Policy Analysis III—Compare and Contrast Paper

This paper will be about crime control model versus the consensus and due process model. In this paper we will discuss the following what role does law enforcement play in these policies, What roles do the prosecutor and courts play in these policies, What role do corrections play in these policies.
The two models of crime with the aim of contrasting each other for decades are the crime control model and due process model. The due process model is the attitude that a person cannot be stripped of life, property or liberty without suitable legal processes and precautions. Any individual that is appointed with a crime is demanded to have their civil rights confined by the criminal justice organization below the due process model. The crime control model for rule enforcement is founded on the statement of complete dependability of police fact-finding, covers arrestees as if they are already originate responsible. (Johnson, 2002).
Crime control representation cites to a possibility of criminal justice which places stress on dropping the crime in company by changed law and prosecutorial authority. In counterpoint, the “due process model” centers person liberties and corrects and is troubled with bounding the abilities of authorities. The function those act in the policies is that they are authorities collected curricula.
There are liberals such as the proponents of the due process model who say that the United States are doing too much in the terms of prosecuting drug addicts and other offenders of drugs. Due to these prosecution, overcrowding of prisons have occurred causing federal, state and local level government economic issues. The due process model proponents argue that the focus should be on rehabilitation of drug addicts because we have been preoccupied with putting drug users in prison as opposed to helping them get help for their addiction. If it were left up to the proponents of the crime control model, they would make sure that all drug users are arrested. On March 21, 2001, proponents of the crime control model arrested 29 pregnant women for having tested positive for drugs in their urine. This incident occurred because of a hospital policy that stated that all positive tests of drugs in a person’s system should be turned over to the police; in return they would make an arrest. But because of the due process model, the United States Supreme Courts ruled that pregnant women cannot be subjected to warrantless, suspicion less searches simply because they are major.
The prosecutor and courts play has being playing a big role in the criminal justice for a long while. After they get all the things that are needed for the inmate’s cases they will then bring it to the courts to see if there is a case. Since the birth of our country non-law abiding citizens have plagued our society which led to the creation and development of our criminal justice system that administers punishment for any crimes committed with-in our society. Punishment for crimes committed is utilized by the criminal justice system as a deterrence that can result in less crimes being committed in the future. The criminal justice system ensures that the correct punishment handed down to a defendant is appropriate for the crime committed which in turn shows future lawbreakers that their crimes will not be tolerated and will be dealt with appropriately. Depending on the crime committed, the evidence collected and how it is presented to a jury of our peers the defendant is usually sentenced to incapacitation imprisonment/capital punishment or rehabilitation. The criminal justice system ensures that everyone that commits a crime is punished as a result of the crime they commit.
The prison system incapacitation was initially developed to keep offenders off the streets thus preventing them from committing crimes in the community resulting in the reduction of crime rates. Capital punishment is also part of the prison system where it is carried out but, in society not everyone feels that criminals should receive the death penalty for a murder they committed. People also believe that capital punishment does not in any way deter future murders committed by other criminals. According to the article “The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Murder,” Hentoff says, “statistics [show] that the murder rate in states with the death penalty is higher than the murder rate in states without capital punishment.”
There is not that big of a variation among federal submission and state and local submission of policies in the criminal justice system. Some examples are federal laws are prohibited among employment so this want become a big discrimination, and the state laws are a little different because they have added their own laws which also forbid employment so there is not a big discrimination act brought up on them.

References
Conflict And Crime Control Model Researchomatic .Retrieved 12 , 2010, from http://www.researchomatic.com/Conflict-And Crime-Control-Model-
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. is a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. From
1987 to1991 Judge Alito served as United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey.
THE LARGEST COLLECTION OF LEGAL JOBS ON EARTH http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/900009183/Prosecutors-and-Defense-Attorneys/ http://litigation.findlaw.com/legal-system/federal-vs-state-courts-key

differences.html#sthash.15Yckraq.dpuf

References: Conflict And Crime Control Model Researchomatic .Retrieved 12 , 2010, from http://www.researchomatic.com/Conflict-And Crime-Control-Model- Samuel A. Alito, Jr. is a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. From 1987 to1991 Judge Alito served as United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. THE LARGEST COLLECTION OF LEGAL JOBS ON EARTH http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/900009183/Prosecutors-and-Defense-Attorneys/ http://litigation.findlaw.com/legal-system/federal-vs-state-courts-key differences.html#sthash.15Yckraq.dpuf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What was David Souter’s background prior to joining the Court? Which President nominated him? What were his personality traits?…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1970 he became a part of President Richard Nixon’s general counsel and in addition became the Assistant Attorney General. In 1983, Antonin Scalia became a part of Ronald Regan’s court of appeals. President Ronald Reagan then nominated him as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 1986.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana just like all of the court's prior. Chief Justice Melville Fuller, Justice Stephen Johnson…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to introduce into the judicial system “an executive principle to secure effective team work.” To accomplish this goal, Taft proposed annual meetings of the Chief Justice and the Senior Circuit Judges. The conference would make “a yearly plan for the massing of the new and old judicial force of the United States in those districts all over the country where the arrears” were, “threatening to interfere with the usefulness of courts.” Taft spoke passionately about the need for annual meetings and lobbied various interest groups from Congress to the American Bar Association. The Conference of Senior Circuit Judges, composed of the Chief Justice and nine Circuit Senior Judges, was established by the Act of September 14, 1922, to meet annually upon the summons of the Chief Justice. The Conference was to make a comprehensive survey of the condition of the business in the courts, prepare plans for the assignment of judges, and submit suggestions to the courts in the interest of uniformity and expedition of business. Taft proudly presided over the Conference, voted as a member, and appointed its committees, all the while serving as its staff and animating…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He went on to become Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, then 8 years later he was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals by Ronald Regan. During Regan’s presidency, Scalia was appointed, and confirmed by the senate to be one of the Associate Justices on the Supreme Court (Reilly, 2016). Antonin Scalia earned his place on the Supreme Court through hard work, and dedication to the Judicial System throughout his career. Scalia’s voice will never be forgotten because he remained to have a strong conservative view throughout his career, and always vocalized his opinions on issues brought forth in the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kennedy. Thurgood Marshall served there until 1965 when Thurgood Marshall became the United States Solicitor General. As Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall represented the federal government before the Supreme…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Antonin Scalia?

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    at the University of Chicago. President Reagan nominated him for the Court of Appeals for the…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The primary goals of the American Criminal Justice system are simply to enforce the law and maintain social order, while protecting the people from injustice. Created by Herbert Packer in the 1960s, the crime control model places emphasis and priority upon the aggressive arrest, prosecution, and conviction of criminals. The due process model focuses…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due process sometimes referred to as the due process clause. The clause “Prohibits state and local governments from depriving persons of life, liberty, or property without certain steps being taken to ensure fairness.” (ILL 2012) Due process demands that the justice system considers the facts of the case. Law agent’s primary focus is from the beginning of the arrest, filing, questioning, and handling the case to ensure fundamentals of fairness under the law. Due process model stretches back to early 1200 century to protect defendant’s rights. “Thomas Jefferson set forth the rationale for the establishment of government in a society: to secure the fundamental, inherent, and preexisting rights of the people.”…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The Constitution guarantees that the government cannot take away a person’s basic rights to life, liberty or property, without due process of law”(The Lectric Law Library, 1995). To pinpoint the characterization down to one word, fairness would be the easiest word to label due process with. The due process’ focal point is more toward a person’s rights and decreasing the government’s powers over a person. Considering that the Crime Control Model can be depicted as increasing the government’s power over a person by raising the power of the police and the prosecutor’s office.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Criminal procedure is the branch of American constitutional law concerned with the state’s power to maintain an orderly society and the rights of citizens and residents to live in freedom from undue government interference with their liberty” (Zalman, 2008, p. 4). The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendments are significant in studying criminal procedure. In criminal justice, the criminal procedure is important because it deals with the conflict between order and liberty directly. To understand the friction between order and liberty, Herbert Packer studied the competing values that underlie the constitutional order through the Due Process Model and Crime Control model. Both of these models have similarities as well as differences on shaping criminal procedure policy. Herbert Packer states, “One is not “good” and the other “bad”; both models embrace constitutional values that are necessary to the kind of society in which we wish to live” (Zalman, 2008, p. 5).…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I had to choose between the crime control model and the due process model, I would choose the due process model. While the crime control focuses more on the victims’ rights, the due process model is based on the constitution. The due process model allows defendants to have a fair trial assuming that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The crime control method is a bit unconstitutional in that it forces the criminal justice system to prove a defendant’s innocence and assumes them to be guilty before looking at the facts of the case.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although crime control and due process have some similarities, there are more contrasts between the two. Crime control emphasizes crime prevention, whereas due process emphasizes the protection of citizen’s rights from mistakes made by criminal justice agencies. The ethical dimensions of key issues confronting the criminal justice system and private security concerning to due process and crime control are citizen’s rights, proper legal representation, as well as physical force, when to use deadly force, and deceptions. The private security industry also faces key ethical issues regarding the lack of training, in addition to violations of rules and regulations.…

    • 863 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays