Preview

Comparing Foucault's Interpretation Of Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Foucault's Interpretation Of Punishment
Foucault’s interpretation of punishment differs to a large extend from Durkheim’s. The first believes that punishment is utilitarian and instrumental in nature, and the second argues that it is mainly moral and emotional. Foucault fails to accept that there are aspects of the penal system that malfunction, a problem which is not present in Durkheim’s study because of the sentimental principles of punishment. However, Niveen was not punished by the society after upsetting their ‘conscience collective’; instead she was punished by psychiatrists and counselors. The modern juridical system punishment transformed the mother into a failure in front of the people. If she would have been punished in a more physical and violent way, as it used to be,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This reading shows Foucault’s critical viewpoint on Immanuel Kant’s perception of Enlightenment and briefly mentions Foucault’s own ideas about Enlightenment.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish, he states that “[a] real subjection is born mechanically from a fictitious relation” (202). Real is the idea that something is fixed, permanent, and immovable. Fictitious’ however, is something that is not real or true. He that is exposed to the understanding of his actions and accepts the accountability to act spontaneously under the constraints of his own power becomes a standard to his own exposure. Basically, explaining that if you fake something as small as it may be could cause the outcome to be painstakingly real. That is, to say the gaze of those observing us is a chiasmus. Chiasmus is a verbal pattern where the second half of an expression is composed against the first with revised elements.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have different morals or ways of life should be treated lower than others. However, the case that follows Meursault’s trial has nothing to do with what he has done, the prosecution is grabbing at straws and although the point that he is trying to make, Meursault is an immoral being that doesn’t belong in this world, is true, he went about it the wrong way. When the judge asks Meursault to explain his actions, he responds by saying that the sun was in his eyes. After the break, Meursault feels small and unimportant because his lawyer explains the order of events as if he is Meursault himself. This little bit of anger from Meursault is the first real and genuine emotion he has displayed since the book started.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe the decided punishment allows for the woman to experience the shame and guilt necessitated for the extent of her sin”.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Duff and Garland, what are the central differences between ‘consequentialist’ and ‘non-consequentialist’ (often referred to as ‘retributivist’) theories of punishment?…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    HLA Hart wrote that any justification of punishment must at least justify the existence of…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The history of punishment is a unique one, since the dawn of man human kind has punished one another. Man did not merely throw someone in a chamber and let them contemplate their crimes such as we do in today’s society; rather, during those early times, punishment was harsh and swift. Criminals were not drawn through the litigation processes; instead, they were found immediately guilty of a crime and brought forth to be punished in an open forum, serving to the masses as an example of the consequences of crime. The early forms of punishment in Europe varied greatly but all forms were meant to inflict unimaginable pain upon the recipient, and it is from the European methods of imprisonment from which the U.S. drew inspiration. Punishment such as crucifixion, burning on pyres, guillotines, and gauntlets are but a few examples of what methods were utilized as early methods of punishment in early Europe. This illustrates the underlying ideology that punishment should be administered with two principles in mind, deterrence and retribution.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideas of punishment from the post enlightenment era, such as, vengeance, humiliation, and retaliation to deter the criminal and other members of society, from further criminal activity would best serve purpose as punishment for type one crimes that are planned and carried out. Crimes that are committed with malice such as burglary and first-degree murder are intentional crimes. These crimes require planning, violent acts, and harm to another. In my opinion, the severe punishment of the post enlightenment era would deter these crimes from happening, due to fear of severe and inhumane punishment. Crimes such as assault (type two) happen in the heat of the moment and are most likely reoccurring no matter what the punishment is.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime has reared its ugly head from as early on as when Cain killed Abel. With the daunting task of understanding that of evil and antisocial actions for philosophers, while still others struggle with concerns to areas within criminal law and subsequent punishments (Bartol & Bartol, 2008).…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eight Amendment Essay

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another example of people’s perspective that agree with death penalties is that it provide closure for the victims making them complacent. For example,’’ Unfortunately, the murderer has deprived his family and friends of a loved one. Their grief begins with the murder. It may not end with the murderer’s execution, but the execution does engender a feeling of relief at no longer having to think about the ordeal—a feeling which often fails to arise while the murderer still lives on’’ . This example is delineating that if that individual does get executed it will make the victim satisfied, giving them their sense of relief.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Puritan society believes that the word of the Bible is the key to a divine life and must be followed. If any individual decides to stray from the Lord’s word, they will be punished. Although those beliefs are heavily pushed in the Puritan society, those beliefs are no longer as widespread. Although Puritan and present day society both consider sins of murder, rape and stealing a major deal, there are still some major differences between the two. Anything that relates to giving your soul to the Black Man, witchcraft, committing or adultery will lead to horrid punishment in the Puritan society. While these sins would lead to the greatest penalty available in their society and generation, the generations of today do not look at them to sin.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probation and Parole

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. What did Cesare Beccaria, the Enlightenment thinker, mean when he said that a punishment should fit the crime?…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays