Preview

Compare And Contrast Sheila And Eva In An Inspector Calls

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Sheila And Eva In An Inspector Calls
J.B Priestley wrote the play an inspector calls to promote capitalism and socialism. He portrayed his and opposing political views through the different characters. Although his play was written in 1945, he chose to set it in 1912. He set the play in this particular era as the date represented an era where all was different to when he was writing.

At the start of the play, Sheila is described as being dressed in an evening dress, a "pretty girl in her early twenties, very pleased with life and excited." This shows Sheila as being someone who seems happy, with not a care in the world. The mention of the evening dress could hint at signs of snobbiness and vanity. Sheila is currently engaged to Gerald Croft and they seem happy at the start of the play however she does "tease" him over his whereabouts last summer. The audience at this point may have already come to their own conclusion of where Gerald was last summer. The stage directions tell us that she is "half- serious, half playful." Regarding Sheila's character, this shows the audience that there may be more than meets the eye to sheila: She knows but chooses not to acknowledge, however, that changes through the play when she starts to mature.
…show more content…
From the very start of the story Eva hasn't had it easy, even when she was employed, she was treated badly: "But these girls aren’t cheap labour – they’re people." This shows that Eva was underpaid and overworked, whereas sheila was spoilt and wealthy: "It's a lovely ring." Sheila has everything going for her, Eva on the bare minimum yet Sheila still used her social position to her advantage against Eva. This could show the progression from 1912 - 1945. Having Sheila abuse her social status for her own selfish reasons then learn from it could represent the changes in society through the years. Priestley wants to show that people and society can change and he does this through Sheila's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sheila Mant Quotes

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sheila Mant is very stuck up and snobby in the story. For instance, during the canoe ride over to the concert Sheila says“My legs are sore.”(Wetherell 297). Sheila was whining about this because the canoe ride was taking so long, which is expected because Sheila did not even offer to help the boy row the boat because she felt she was…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as they meet in act one, Birling attempts to show his social superiority to the Inspector, boasting about his contacts in the police force, this shows Birlings character and the type of person he is, big headed and boastfull. Within the play Mr and Mrs Birling seems to be the only characters that are unable to accept the fact that they helped in the death of eva smith. In contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling Sheila has total opposite views and realises what she did was wrong, and wishes that she could go back and never get Eva sacked-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheila was next to turn Eva down, all because of her bad temper. After “two months” of barely surviving, after Mr Birling fired her, Eva found a job at a dress shop. This dress store was Millwards, which happened to be one of Sheila’s favourite dress shops and Eva was “very…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first person to take advantage of Eva is Mr Birling: he exploited Eva and his workers for his own gain, he refused them a pay rise, just so his company didn't lose any money. When they went on strike, he used that against them and felt he had a good enough reason to fire Eva and a few others, just because they were a threat to his business and his money making. "Every man for himself." This shows Mr Birling felt he had to look after his own before Eva, this is the type of attitude a capitalist portrays. Priestley wanted to promote capitalism in his play and he does this through a bad light using Mr Birling and his…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second scene shifts to the motel room where the audience is introduced to the second character, Sheila. Their different approach to life clearly shows as Sheila is more cautious than Bridie, questioning about the interview she is about to give. Sheila’s values are formed by the English values of her ime and her religious background was Protestant. Her mother was clearly the more significant parent as Sheila was influenced by her mother to wear gloves in public, feeling superior to Orientals and Colonials and keeping up appearances.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - At the end of the play, Sheila is much wiser. She now views her parents and Gerald from a new perspective. She now…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Mr Birling, the next character the Inspector questions is Sheila. Although Sheila is a young girl, she is of a high class, so she does therefore have some power. She too abuses her power and orders to have Eva Smith fired from her job when shopping because Sheila thought Eva was laughing at her. She says ‘If she was a pathetic looking…

    • 759 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Birlings often show their wealth and power through gestures of grandeur. In act 1, Mr Birling assures Gerald that that what he is marrying into is a honourable family. He does these countless times through sly mentioning of the port they’re drinking or the size of their business. At this moment Sheila also makes teasing comments to Gerald, but towards Gerald Mr and Mrs Birling feel obligated to portray a family with great manners including a modest and obedient daughter. Eric shows the flawed behaviour in their family, as he constantly misbehaves and is obviously fond of drinking.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The beginning is almost like a red-herring, -a distraction from what is truly underneath, deceit. The engagement is as if meant to be a formality, a ring binding to households together, but no their hearts. We are let on to this fact, especially when Sybil calls both Sheila and Eric out of the dining room for assistance in something or other, which triggers off the feeling that perhaps that’s not all she is calling them out for, after all she has Edna the maid servant to be of help to her. Sheila enters the room just after Mr Birling confesses, and is shown to be more inquisitive than the rest of the family present at the scene; Sheila; “What’s this all about? Mr Birling; “Nothing to do with you, Shiela.Run along. Sheila: “What business? What’s happening?”, The above shows that Sheila is interested in what is going on and is a curious character, however her interest is brushed aside by Mr Birling, who treats Sheila like a child even shoo-ing her off as if she were a dog, yet his treatment towards her doesn’t discourage her to stop asking questions, in fact she goes on asking, showing that she is also an insistent person. She has moved on from the celebratory occasion, and doesn’t bring up the subject throughout the entire interrogation,…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In act 1 The Birling family and Gerald are celebrating Gerald and Sheila's engagement in the dining room. Sheila and Eric are arguing in a not really serious way, while Gerald and Mr. Birling are talking about business, politics mostly about the Titanic. Mr. Birling is on his way to the next social class by getting an knighthood. Lady Croft has a very strong view of social classes; it looks like she isn't too happy about the fact, that her son is engaged to a girl of a lower class. Just before the ring bells and the inspector arrives, Mr. Birling shows his outlook on life to Gerald and Eric "a man has to make his own way, has to look after himself and his family". The inspector enters and tells them about the suicide. He shows a photograph to Mr.Birling. and starts questioning him. It turns out that Eva Smith had been one of Mr.Birlings. employees and later on was discharged because she asked for more money, had been refused and went on a strike along with allot of other employees, and was later fired for being one of the…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ● Play set in 1912 but written in 1945. ● Britain after the war was a time…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act One, Sheila and her family are celebrating her engagement to Gerald Croft. Although Sheila is excited and full of joy, she can’t help but wonder why Gerald spent all of last summer avoiding her and blaming it on work, as it says on page 3, “(half serious, half playfully) Yes - except all last summer when you never came near me, and I wondered what had happened to you.” Sheila’s tone with Gerald is quite serious sometimes, even when she is trying to be playful.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inspector Calls

    • 768 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sheila starts out in the play as a very spoilt girl, and also seems rather shallow. Several things give us this impression in the first scene, for example her reaction to her engagement ring: “Oh Mummy – isn’t it a beauty?!” She also appears quite naive, despite her curiosity as to where her fiancé Gerald spent his summer last year. However, as soon as the Inspector starts to interview the family, we see an altogether different side of her. She shows compassion immediately when hearing about her father’s poor treatment of Eva Smith in his factory: “But these girls aren’t just cheap labour – they’re people”. She is also horrified by her own part in Eva's story. She feels full of guilt for her jealous actions and blames herself as "really responsible."…

    • 768 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the inspector arrives at the home, suddenly we are shown that this respectable' young man has his own dark secrets. We first see suggestions of this at the dinner table, when Sheila (again) asks him where he was last summer, and then later Sheila says to him that he must have done things that he was ashamed of, he gives himself away immediately by being surprised and on guard because of the comment. What bothers Sheila is maybe not so much that he has a secret but that he is not honest with her. Even when she confronts him about how he knew Eva he expects her to behave like a little woman and be satisfied with a very small piece of information instead of the whole truth. Although we are immediately shocked on finding out what Gerald's secret is, he tells his story with himself as a victim of circumstance. He says that he didn't intend to stay at the bar long because he hated the hard-eyed and dough-faced' women, and met Eva when saving her from unwanted advances. He helped her out of pity with no other intention, but she became his mistress because he became the most important person in her life'. In a way, Gerald is let off of some of the guilt, since even the inspector says that he made her happy for a time, and she had the experience of living in her own home and falling in love. Gerald did have affection for her, even if he didn't love her like she loved him, he was the only one out of them all to actually have a personal relationship with her. He also shows his care when he becomes distressed when it hits home that she is dead. On the other hand, there are things about this story that add to Gerald's guilt. For instance, he says that he hated the prostitutes at the bar, but then why did he go there in the first place unless it was to pick up a prostitute. Then he helped Eva, but why did he meet her a second time by arrangement? He goes on to basically blame Eva for the fact that she became his mistress, saying that she was grateful to him, as Sheila says he…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off Sheila can be self centered. One reason she is self centered is she talks about herself often. When Sheila and the boy are moving down the river she talks and talks about herself, and the boy never has much of a chance to talk to her about himself. She can also be considered self centered, because she did not want to get in the canoe with the boy. This quote helps explain this, “ ‘Look,’ she said. ‘I can get Dad’s car.’ ‘It’s faster this way,’ I lied. ‘Parking’s tense up there. Hey, it’s safe. I won’t tip it or anything.’ She let herself down reluctantly into the bow” (Wetherall 2). This demonstrates that she is looking for a way to travel how she wants, because she “reluctantly” (Wetherell 2) lets herself down into the boat. Another time she is self centered is the way she acts. While she is on a float she has several body positions, and each one means a certain thing. These positions are, “If she lay flat on the diving board with her had training idly in the water… that her various suitors found the courage to come near” (Wetherell 1). This shows that she is self centered by acting, only some of you can come near me, or do not disturb me. Sheila can also be considered rude. At one point in the story she claims that “fishing’s dumb,’ she said making a face. ‘I mean, it’s boring and all. Definitely dumb’ “ (Wetherell 3). She acts rude when not considering others feelings who might enjoy the activity. Another time she acts rude is when she goes into the canoe. In the canoe there are two paddles, and the boy had one. The other paddle was lying in the boat and Sheila did not pick it up and help paddle. Instead she sat in the canoe as if paddling was not good enough of a task for her to do. The last rude action Sheila performs is at the end of the story when she leaves the show and goes home with someone else. This is the quote, “all I really…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays