Preview

Compare And Contrast Sargon The Great And Egyptian Empires

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Sargon The Great And Egyptian Empires
Throughout the course of human civilization many empires have risen and fallen, however the empires of Sargon the Great, the Assyrian’s, and the Persian’s have left their legacy due to their innovativeness and creativity. For example, Sargon the Great created the notion of appointing governors in conquered territories. Also the Persian’s adopted one single language (Aramaic) to help innovate their road systems, postal services, and trades. These are just some of the many tools these empires used to grow in size and conquer vast lands. First of all the empire of Sargon the Great started various trends that would soon be taken up by many future empires yet to come. A major characteristic of Sargon the Great’s empire was his advanced ideas in a non-advanced era. For instance: “Establishing a pattern that future despotic rulers would emulate, Sargon stationed garrisons in conquered lands”(Perry,10) this can depict that Sargon thought ahead of his time in militaristic campaigns. Also another thing Sargon was known for was his large army which was ready to stop any rebellions before the could even become a concern. Another thing that Sargon used to aid his empire was by adopting the Sumerian’s …show more content…
This empire consisted of Semitic people from the upper Tigris River who were famous for strategically planned military campaigns and siege weapons such as: “battering rams but on massive wheeled frames—which pulverized city walls”(Perry,23). This highly sophisticated empire was keen on having their soldiers better dressed and suited both as armor and weapons on the battlefield. From pillaging Babylonia, Syria, and Egypt the kings of Assyria believed their gods helped them out in every single military campaign. One crucial aspect to the Assyrians were their success; which could be explained from how the kings ruled absolutely and would collect tributes to build roads, messenger services, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chua discusses the Achaemenid Empire in Chapter One. Lying in present-day Iraq, the Achaemenid Empire was the earliest hyper-power of the world, ruling as many as 42 million people. The story of the Achaemenid began with Cyrus the Great. Cyrus, remarkably complete in religious tolerance, not only spiritually freed people, but also restored them. Cyrus did not establish new kingdoms through conquering by strength, but instead, he did so by respecting the people and their freedom and human rights. Cyrus serves as a prime example of ruling people by serving them rather than coercing them through fear and force.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sargon was a strong general. He was a great general/teacher to his army to teach them all they needed to know for fighting battles. Sargon had amazing strategies. One great strategie was having his army in tsudo form when they went to fight. He also taught his soldiers to fight in tight formation. Another reason, is soldiers who carried shields were in the front of the tsudo, and people who carried spears were in the middle…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 3500-1500 BCE, Mesopotamia and Egypt emerged as two of the first river- valley civilizations. Although they came to be around the same time, they became different in their cultural aspects, such as universal views and classes, and economies due to differences in commerce.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes Administration Essay

    • 3811 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It has widely been established by both modern and ancient historians that the administrative basis of the Persian Empire was introduced by Cyrus the Great, where it was later revised and stabilised by Darius I around 519BC. According to Herodotus, Xerxes had inherited his father Darius’ perfected system of satrapies, satraps and economic and communications improvements which enabled Xerxes to continue the running of the Achaemenid empire. Modern historian Bury states that the administration of the empire included all the important aspects of life, such as; military, cultural, social and judicial influences. Despite various views amongst both ancient and modern historians whether subject peoples were fairly treated within the empire, it has been generally established that Persian administration led by Cyrus II, Darius I and Xerxes was successful in establishing and maintaining a successful communications and trade network within the empire.…

    • 3811 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic people until 1206, when they acknowledged Temujin as the supreme leader, Genghis Khan. A huge empire was created under his rule, linking Eastern and Western Eurasia. An analysis of these documents will discuss the topic of how the Mongols expanded their empire so far in such a short time through their power of violence. This analysis will also show the admiration and respect of the Mongols by others in surrounding regions. Ultimately, this analysis will discuss how the fear from other people gave the Mongols their biggest advantage in conquering other regions to expand their enormous empire.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sargon the Great was an Akkadian emperor famous for his conquest of the Sumerian city-states in the 23rd and 22nd centuries BC.[1] The founder of the Dynasty of Akkad, Sargon reigned from 2270 to 2215 BC…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Mongols Barbarians

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mongols lived in the 13th century and known for having one of the largest connected land mass empire. But throughout Asia and Europe, they have a reputation for being a fearsome tribe and a threat to civilizations and their people. They also have some “customs” within their own nation that would earn them the title of “barbarians.” Despite these actions, their empire was actually quite civilized and well thought out.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite their diplomatic and mercantile qualities, the Assyrians had the most capable and savage military of their time. Through technological advancements and sheer ruthlessness, they built the largest empire the ancient world had ever seen.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cyrus the Shepherd

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Persia "Cyrus the Shepherd" invited a newer, more sophisticated government that distinguished it from the previous foundation civilization. In this new government, a centralized bureaucracy ruled, meaning that while Cyrus was the king and Persepolis was the capital a highly staffed team helped run the empire. Since the Persian Empire was so large, Cyrus broke it up into many distinct sections called satraps, which had considerable local autonomy (power). In other words, not only was there a strong central government but there was also bureaucrats who helped rule and maintain order in provinces throughout the empire. The Persian Empire, in addition, was very diverse, containing many different religions and ethnicities. Overall, the Persian Emperors were very tolerant and respected all peoples. The big religion you should know, however, is Zoroastrianism. Many historians consider this the first Monotheistic faith. Technologically, the Persians had Qantas which were sophisticated irrigation dams. Of course, metallurgy was still an integral part of technological life.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    As we can tell, the Persian Empire had improved economically, politically, and socially due to the Persian Wars of Expansion. Economically, the empire had improved in trade from gaining more land. Politically, the emperors that ruled over this period of time had helped the economic growth as well as having more power over people. Socially, the empire’s cultural ideas and social beliefs had been widespread and influenced other countries around because of the people that practiced the same beliefs on this vast amount of…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia was about 300 miles long and 150 miles wide. It was located between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. The word Mesopotamia itself means "The land between two rivers". With this, Mesopotamia depended on the cultivation of the land for survival. As Mesopotamia began to develop there were city-states that were established. These city-states were surrounded by a mud brick wall and farmland. Sumerians would take great pride in their city-state, and that created chaos. At times wars would break out to prove which city-state was the strongest. Each city-state had a priest-king to rule over their people. However, their beliefs were polytheistic and centered their beliefs in four Gods that represented power. These Gods provided for mankind and every year the Sumerians believed that the Gods would decide their faith. During the time between 2700 ca. and 2600ca. there was a ruler who ran the city-state of Uruk, Gilgamesh the famously known king who was two-thirds God and one third-man. On the other hand, during the time of Roland their civilization was ran by one king known as Charlemagne, who believed in monotheism and that Christianity was the one true religion. During this reign Charlemagne was anointed as the head of the Roman Empire. Their goal as a society was based on conquering cities to convert them to Christianity. Both our epic heroes are from different eras in time that may have contributed to their actions; however, as contradictory as their civilizations were they share distinctions and parallels in their character.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient world, Egypt and Mesopotamia coexisted between 3000 and 2000 B.C.E. Throughout this essay, I will be comparing and contrasting these two prominent ancient civilizations. Both had many cultural and political differences between them. Although ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia shared similarities in beliefs and agriculture, they differed greatly in afterlife and documentation.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many ancient and modern interpretations about Sennacherib’s effectiveness as a ruler. Sennacherib was a king from 704 BCE up to 681BCE. He accomplished numerous things for Assyria such as, the expansion of the empire, build water supplies to the city and the gain of support from the gods to the Assyrian people. The ancient and modern interpretations provide many information’s about Sennacherib’s building projects, military and religious role. Sennacherib was a very effective ruler and this will be assessed throughout this essay.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This semester I have conducted research on two of history 's most, in my opinion, distinct and strongest societies. The first one is the civilization of Ancient Egypt. It lasted from 3100BC to 1085BC. That 's about 2,015 years. The second society is the Roman Empire. Rome, as an empire, lasted from 31BC to 476AD. That 's only about 507 years, but that doesn 't span all of Rome 's history as a whole; the Roman Empire is only a portion of Rome 's history. While both of these societies are timeless civilizations, Rome was monotheistic, more technologically advanced, and more economically advanced, while Egypt was polytheistic, more academically advanced, and they still relied…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays