Preview

Compare And Contrast North And Confederate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast North And Confederate
When both the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South) entered into war with each other, neither side was thoroughly prepared for battle. Both the North and the South had issues gathering enough resources and raising funds to support their war efforts (Goldberg, ed. 7, The American Journey, 405). However, the Union did have an advantage over the Confederacy. The North had a large population, strong political and military leadership, and plentiful resources; while the South struggled to piece together an entirely new government and army. This early upper-hand by the Union was what helped them eventually wear down the Southern troops at the end of the war and win. The Union had a huge advantage over the Confederacy in terms of resources. Not only did the North have a larger population than the South, but they also had a navy, a national army, and vast transportation systems to utilize during the war (Goldberg, 406-07). The Union also operated many manufacturing and industrial plants that could produce weapons and other products of war (Goldberg, 407). …show more content…
Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, had a military background and experience as a secretary of war which made him the best candidate for the position (Goldberg, 408). Davis faced many problems early on in his leadership: from having create an entirely new government to figuring out how to finance the war. Although Jefferson Davis did his best, he did not possess the same leadership or communication skills that President Abraham Lincoln had. Lincoln was the President of the Union and was great at boosting the Northerner’s morale and convincing them to continue fighting in the war. Although both were great leaders with similar military backgrounds, Lincoln was able to better utilize the North’s resources in the most strategic way possible helping his side tremendously throughout the war (Goldberg,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Civil War has been called the first modern war. It depended on railroads, mass-produced weapons, joint army-navy tactics, iron-plated warships, rifled guns and artillery, and trench warfare. The Confederacy had just 9 million people as compared with 22 million in the Union in 1861, and although the Confederacy had only a fraction of the industrial capacity of its opponent, the South was fighting in defense of its own homeland. The North had longer supply lines and the problem of occupying captured areas. It had to commit a greater proportion of its men away from the front than did the South, which could count…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: 1.The Union states larger population allowed them to have a bigger army than the Confederacy, which was a great advantage.2.Another advantage in having a larger population during the civil war is if they ever needed more help they could ask for more.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Williamson Murray's essay he discusses the struggle between the North and the South. Also how it was the first modern war that was fought using technology and industry on the slaughtering fields. The union lacked a cohesive army and a good plan of attack. Once General Grant was in command for the North, the Confederacy was hopeless to win. The Civil War ravaged armies of the North and South, many Americans lost their lives which made this the most costly of all the wars in American history. The North won the war because they "adapted to the conditions of the war." With the help of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, they came up with a strategy and won the war.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Confederates (also referred to as the “South” or the “Grays”) are led by a gentleman who values and morals are waivered by no outside influence; his name is General Robert E. Lee, also known as “the Old Gray Fox”. He is a very religious man who takes time to observe what is happening and waits to make a decision and sequentially allows his actions to unfold with the support of his trusted underlings and his God. “’…General Lee makes decisions and he moves,’” (Shaara 251). **As well as all of these, Lee was passionate and determined about winning the war. ** He truly cared for all that worked with him before and during the war as seen in chapter two, part three, after learning of Reynolds’s death, Reynolds“…his mind flashed a vision of Reynolds. A neat trim man. A gentleman, a friend. Lee shook his head…Reynolds dead. Gone.” (Shaara 104).…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the battle, both Union and Confederate suffered major casualties. Many Confederate soldiers had died not just in the battle itself. The Unions had suffered the most pain in this way. In just one hour, about 7 thousand men had died and overall they lost 50 thousand men out of 117,000. The Confederates losses were much less severe; they only lost about 1,500 to 60,000…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Davis lacked popular appeal. At no time in his life did he mingle freely with the masses under circumstances that might have enabled him to develop an appreciation of their aspiration and virtues. He never felt close to them, and they didn't to him. Davis never succeeded in dramatizing the issues of the war or in arousing public enthusiasm for their support. Confederates like to compare their struggle with the Colonial revolt against England. But their President was never able to infuse the Southern movement with the lofty purposes and timeless qualities that Jefferson and Paine breathed into the American Revolution.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Few advantages in the South were able to fight on it large homeland, they had best military leaders, they encouraged young males to serve in the army and military school. They even export cotton, rice, sugar cane and tobacco for the money. The North held many advantages over the South, there were more resource and population. The Northern states had a twenty-two million of the…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were several factors that allowed the north to win the Civil War, One of the main reasons is that the north had far more soldiers and resources than the south. Then on the Proclamation's provisions, the blacks were allowed enrollment into the military which added even more men to the Northerners side.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Union and Confederate armies fought against each other in the Civil War. This essay is about comparing and contrasting the Union Army and the Confederate Army. The better well supplied Union Army had more factories and soldiers against the Confederate Army who wasn’t as well supplied.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the North having more production and population, the South could have won the Civil War with a few adjustments. Notice how the South’s largest production is cotton, compared to the North. The North had a balance of different types of production, which enabled the soldiers to be easily equipped with materials and accumulate wealth. One of the major reasons why the South lost was that it spent more on cotton production instead of increasing the other types of production. If it spent more on the different types, it could have won. The South depended heavily on agricultural type of labor, through the use of slaves. The slave owners did not free the slaves, since they were needed to cultivate the cotton to raise profit for the owners. Moreover,…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrial economy, transportation systems, and population were all significant aspects in the North’s victory over the South in the Civil War. The Confederacy lacked the necessities needed to win the war and was no match for the innovative North. The North had all the key resources needed to win the war making it nearly impossible to be defeated by…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    America split away from Great Britain for the sole reason that the people were not treated fairly. Ironically, in America where everyone was free, slavery was legal. Although many people believed it to be moral, there was an equally big population that did not. This created a big division between the two regions of America. The North and the South were two enemies on different sides; this held true when the Civil War took place. But even so, there were lots of conflicts that led up to the war. The issue over slavery grew, and spread to other things, directly affecting them. Things like the economy were affected, and also created a greater gap between the regions. “The industrialization of the northern states had an impact upon urbanization…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An important advantage to have in the civil war was the advantage of technology. The north was a manufacturing center of the world, mass producing products new and old at an efficient rate. The north also had a sprawling system of railroads which could carry supplies and troops across the country fast. The north developed the telegraph which allowed them to telecommunicate pretty much anywhere instantly. Both the north and south had advantages in Government and society. The north already had an established government. Many of the southerners were united to defend their way of life. Advantages in geography/goals… or something to that effect. The southerners were used to the terrain. The north had to invade and take over while the south just…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays