Preview

Compare And Contrast Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World
J. Chandler
W. Carraway
World Civilization I
October 22, 2012
Genghis Khan Genghis Khan was both a feared military conqueror ad an intelligent administrative of the empire he created, but I think that khan being an intelligent administrative of his empire was the most important of the two of shaping the modern world. Its most his techniques he used as the military conqueror that made me certain. Khan fighting techniques shows that he has leadership skills, he was able to the find his enemies strengths and weaknesses and use it against them. His leadership skills where to good use when he trained his army to win. In “ Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World” written by Jack Weatherford, he stated that “ […] Khan’s innovative fighting techniques made the heavily armored knights of medieval Europe obsolete, replacing them with disciplined cavalry moving in coordinated units. Rather than relying on defensive fortifications, he made brilliant use of speed and surprise on the battlefield, as well as perfecting siege warfare to such degree that he ended the era
…show more content…
Weatherford“ In twenty-five years […]. Khan, together with his sons and grandsons, conquered the most densely populated civilizations of the thirteenth century. […] In American terms, the accomplishments of Genghis Khan might be understood if the United States, […], had been founded by one of its illiterate slaves, who […] united the people, created an alphabet, wrote the constitution, established universal religious freedom, invented a new system of warfare, marched an army from Canada to Brazil, and open roads of commerce in a free-trade zone that stretched across the continents. […] Khan’s accomplishments challenge the limits of imagination and tax the resources of scholarly explanation” (Weatherford

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongols DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mongols, who eventually became known as the Tatars, were one of the most savage conquerors of history. The Mongols had good military tactics, that’s how they conquered many so fast. They were very clever in their battles and planned ahead. They didn’t act until they had plenty of men or when they had…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongol leaders also contributed greatly to their success. Khan (known as Great Khan), the very powerful military leader, didn’t tolerate the defiance of others “if you do not obey the command of Heaven, and run counter to our orders we shall know that you are our foe,” (Doc: 9). This statement is a response to the Pope, another powerful leader. The Pope recognizes the force which Khan is using “with a fury still unabated you do not cease from breaking the bonds of natural ties, sparing neither sex nor age, you rage against all indiscriminately with the sword of chastisement” (Doc: 8). This reestablishes the brutal force that Khan is using to benefit himself by leaving no survivors to spread information or become his enemies. Chinggis Khan was also a brutal leader, “he sent soldiers out against those of…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genghis Khan protected Buddhists, Muslim, Christians and Hindus. They create more new technology like : Guns, gun powder, men wore silk shirt to battle. He established paper money and trading between different nations and is it a big part of our economic. Trade is the main part of his nation survival, because the Mongols had little production base. He create trading across Eurasia. Also, Mongols…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols were fearsome and savage fighters, but had smart and loyal political leaders that gave their small population power. Some of the smartest and loyal leaders were in Persia and china both being at the top of political structures. However the Mongols in china had different beliefs of trusting the natives to have power in politics than the Mongols in Persia did. The political structures in both china and Persia promoted strong merchant trade helping the economy, which made them wealthy strong territories.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many who felt this way spent time in the capital city, seeing the huge empire function firsthand. The idea that Genghis Khan was a bringer or order and peace is evident, as shown by the Khan’s shaman, (Doc. 1). However, the shaman may have been influenced by his elite position in contact with the Khan himself. Writing in a book that was public, he may have intentionally praised Genghis Khan as a peace-bringer, as it could help advance his own position in the eyes of the Khan. Not only native Mongols, but also European visitors viewed the Mongols as a well-organized, productive force. The Mongols had an impressive system of accountability in the military, (Doc. 3) and good law enforcement in the cities, (Doc. 5). These statements indicate the belief that Mongol government was both just and disciplined. Lastly, some Muslims also held the Mongols in esteem for their good government, describing how it was possible to travel far and wide in their territories without fear of robbery, (Doc. 8). People in contact with and conquered by the Mongols were not only impressed by their ability to organize and provide peace to their empire, they were impressed by the vast wealth of the Mongols, as…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the rise to power of Genghis Khan in the early 13th century, Mongolian politics were adapted to rule the vast empire they now controlled. At the head of the system was the Great Khan who held absolute power; to ensure this power, Genghis replaced former leaders with loyal military commanders, created army divisions made up of diverse tribal and ethnic groups, and implemented an imperial guard of specialized soldiers…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Army DBQ

    • 1692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Restatement of Thesis­ Of the many great empires of history, the Mongols proved to be the…

    • 1692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though he had the largest empire in History, Genghis Khan was not kind in any way. Many of his attacks where extremely brutal, wiping out whole communities. His army was very fast, and we can learn from him is his leadership, and the fact that he had his own opinion.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 12th century, the great ruler Temujin, soon to be known as Genghis Khan, arose. He fought to join clans, and become Khan, or ruler. New strategies and ideas were enforced after having Genghis Khan as ruler such as tribal cavalry, and mobile tactical teams in the military. Over the next three decades, he led a constant military…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A picture of a Mongol horse-mounted bowman demonstrates how skilled these soldiers were in their combat. We can assume the artist admires the Mongols method of fighting by their interpretation of a skilled archer turning a full 180 degrees to shoot an arrow, all while riding a horse. If the time period of Mongol conquest matches closely to the time the painting was done, we can mark this source as reliable. Marco Polo recorded in 1298 about his travels eight years before when first handedly seeing the Mongols army. “They are brave in battle, almost to desperation, setting little value upon their lives, and exposing themselves without hesitation to all manner of danger… No people on earth can surpass them in fortitude under difficulties, nor show greater patience under wants of every kind. They are most obedient to their chiefs, and are maintained at small expense.”. Though this is an eyewitness account, we are forced to question on its reliability since it wasn’t written down until eight years later. This document is unbiased because it was observed and written by a person who was neither Mongol nor a Mongol enemy. A biased record of admiration is present in the document written by Juvaini, a high ranked official of the Mongol who shortly after writing this document was appointed as the governor of Baghdad. He states, “For they have divided all the people into companies of ten,…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ghengis Kahn had a huge role making the Mongols a world empire. He was a…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World History 600-1450

    • 3256 Words
    • 14 Pages

    grandsons continued the conquests until the empire eventually reached its impressive size. Genghis Khan is…

    • 3256 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Genghis Khan may have made some beneficial contributions to society, which made a long lasting impressions ours, such as improving the wellbeing of his nation, and conquering other territories. Genghis Khan had more of a negative impact upon the people with which he came into contact with because he believed he was the chosen one, and acted as a merciless emperor.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genghis Khan’s legacy is one of the most well known. They are known for their large empire that stretched across Eurasia. They were brutal and violent, but somehow it worked out and they obtained one of the largest empires in the world and what is now known as the second greatest empire to ever exist (after the Roman Empire of course). The most important aspect of the Mongolian Empire’s legacy was the strength of the military organization, along with their superior archery skills and their tactics.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mongol Criticisms

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongol Invasions of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries have long been a point of contention amongst historians and scholars. The series of assaults launched on behalf of the Mongols ultimately amounted to a holocaust in which few were spared. Though the immediate impacts of the conquests were undeniably horrific, some historians have commended later Mongol regimes for the institutional reforms they introduced. However, even with these post invasion innovations in mind, a legitimate rationale behind the excessive destruction and violence is still a question for debate. When examining the ideological motives of the Mongols, it is clear that they were radically impassioned by their beliefs. Unfortunately, the logic behind these beliefs is less clear. Taking into consideration the relevant religious debate during the time period as exemplified in “William of Rubric’s Account of the Mongol Invasions” as well as the pertinent humanitarian concerns best illustrated by renowned historian Ibn al-Athir, criticisms regarding the religious legitimacy and negative humanitarian impacts of the Mongol Invasions are valid assessments. The first controversy surrounding the impact of the Mongol invasions is whether or not their motives were legitimate. Much of historian criticism suggests that the religious and ideological beliefs of the Mongols that compelled them to action were both extremist and illogical. The second topic of debate is whether, with those motives in mind, the extermination of such an enormous group of people, could possibly be justified. In contrast with these historians’ criticisms, some historians commend the institutional reforms and cultural changes initiated by the Mongols. However, considering the inhumanity of systematically exterminating entire civilizations based on religious and ideological beliefs that are in many ways flawed, historian…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics