Preview

Compare And Contrast Egypt And Mayans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
704 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Egypt And Mayans
Mayans and Egyptians Although thousands of years apart, the Mayans and the Egyptians were both very successful civilizations. The Egyptians lived in Northern Africa near the Nile River, and their peak lasted from around 3000 B.C to around 0. The Mayans lived in Southern Mexico and Northern Central America, and their Classical Period lasted from around 250 A.D to 900 A.D. Both had great sociological and technological breakthroughs. The Mayans and Egyptians were also well known for their activity in their religions and incorporated them into their daily lives. In this essay I will discuss the important accomplishments the two societies have made by comparing and contrasting them. Both Mayans and Egyptians had a theocratic government. That meant that religion was deeply ingrained with government business such as the economy and making laws. The king was the most powerful position, and he was often treated like one of the gods. The King’s position was also hereditary, so no one outside the family could become king unless the family lineage ended. Both …show more content…
As mentioned earlier, Mayan and Egyptian civilization were both theocracies. The king was at the top of the class, and he was treated like a god himself. Both positions of kingship were hereditary. The next king could not be an outsider unless there was no one else to claim the throne. In Mayan civilization, the King controlled many of the religious activities. The Mayans also had noble classes with warriors and priests, merchants, and the majority of peasants. Egypt shared similar characteristics and had a peasant majority. The Pharaoh was at the top of the social classes and controlled almost everything in the empire. He was treated like a god, and his sons could hope to inherit his position. However, in Mayan civilization the king's sons would become priests and could hope to be the next king in line. In Egypt, lower social classes could work hard to move

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    They both had political and religious power. In Mesopotamia the city's ruler, was thought to be related to a god. In Egypt, the pharaohs were thought to be gods or related to gods. In Egypt, the gods had heads like animals and bodies like humans.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 3500-1500 BCE, Mesopotamia and Egypt emerged as two of the first river- valley civilizations. Although they came to be around the same time, they became different in their cultural aspects, such as universal views and classes, and economies due to differences in commerce.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theocracy is the ruling of people in the name of a god. Different Mesopotamian societies had their own forms of theocracy. One example, is King Hammurabi Babylon (r. 1792-1750 B.C.E.) claimed to be chosen by Marduk to rule. He used this power to create the “law code”, one of the first forms of written law in a society. Egypt was ruled the same way. The Pharaoh was indeed a god in human form. Specifically he was the god Horus that waited the rejoining of his father Osiris in the afterlife. Pharaoh had power over the wealth and resources of people. Unlike Mesopotamia, they would tax people’s crops. This is proven by an excerpt from Ramesside Texts Relating to the Taxation and Transport of Corn, “And now the scribe lands on the river-bank and is about to register the…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia vary drastically in land and geographic features due to its location. They had more differences than similarities which was a cause for the uniquely different cultures of each.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Along with their outlooks being different, so were the structures of their government and cities. The Mesopotamian civilization was organized in a dozen or more different city states, while the Egyptian civilization maintained unity. This being, cities in Egypt were far less important than in Mesopotamia. Each city-state in Mesopotamia was ruled by a different king, that claimed to be that city's patron deity. The Egyptians were ruled by a pharaoh, believed to be a god in human form. This shows that were ruled in very different ways, by very different people. It also shows how different the structure of their cities were.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Egypt the social class was not so different than Mesopotamia’s. Egypt had social classes that were hierarchy. At the top of their social class it was the pharaohs and priests. Next came the artists, merchants, lesser priests, farmers, and then the slaves. Women were not treated equal to men but they had more rights than in other societies. Several queens, women pharaohs, and Nephritides were the first to have more rights than others. In Mesopotamia they also had many social classes that were hierarchy. At the top of the social class they had the ruling family, high ranking officials, nobility, and important priests. Next were the artists, merchants, lesser priests, and scribes. Finally the farmers, peasants, and slaves were at the bottom. Women were not treated equal to men and had fewer rights than women in Egypt.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geological features can positively and negatively effect the development of a nation or a region. Ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia drastically relied on the resources rivers provided for them. Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamian both had similar and different reasons and benefits for using the rivers.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia Vs Egypt

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Egyptʼs geography and climate influenced the development of its religion, politics, and outlook. Egyptian civilization was focused on the Nile River and the surrounding deserts. The Nile River flooded at appropriate times to allow grain to grow. The Egyptians had a positive outlook because the river was dependable. This dependability also made the Egyptians view the universe as an orderly beneficial world, andviewed the afterlife as orderly and optimistic as well. The Egyptian religion was focused on guaranteeing continuous flow from the Nile and prosperity derived from the river and its ability to irrigate the land. The pharoh, the Egyptian ruler, was believed to be a descendant from the gods. The Egyptian king was Horus, and the son of Re, the sun-god. It was believed that the king intervened with the gods on behalf of the Egyptian people. Since the king was connected to the sun-god and assured prosperity from the Nile, the kingʼs leadership was divine. It also helped that the land was fertile for many years, giving the Egyptian leader more credibility and power. Around the fifth millennium B.C.E. Farming developed along the Nile River.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Civilization thrived in the lands surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. Each had its own distinct views on the social, political, and religious aspects; however, there were many similarities as well. Through this essay, I will illustrate the differences, as well as the similarities of the fascinating early civilizations of Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the differences between the Mesopotamian cultures lies within the politics. The two cultures operated very differently as Mesopotamia was ruled regionally while Egypt used a more centralized government. Kings in the Mesopotamian region formed city states ruled by leaders of their armies while they just oversaw what was going on via these mediums. On the other hand, Egyptian culture featured “god-kings” or pharaohs that controlled much larger expanses of land than Mesopotamian leaders did. Logically, it makes sense that this would occur because of the differences in influence for these two regions. For example, unification of Egypt was inspired by Sudan’s use of small kingdoms that governed the agriculture of the rulers. The Egyptians then faced competition which caused their small kingdoms to conquer neighboring kingdoms to the point where they controlled much larger territories. The notion of kings and pharaohs leads into another difference. Mesopotamian societies featured monarchies as they were led by kings while Egyptians had a theocracy as pharaohs were divine rulers. In Mesopotamia it is figured that their monarchs evolved from men making decisions on behalf of their whole…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mesopotamia and egypt

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Around 5000bce, Mesopotamia consisted of many city-states. These city-states were each ruled by an individual king or leader. The idea of self governing depended of the agriculture territories each region controlled. In contrast, Egyptians had only one ruler, the Pharaoh. The Pharaoh was believed to be a god in human form. Egypt united their country early in history. The rulers wore two crowns symbolizing the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did religion compare between Egypt and Mesopotamia. Both Mesopotamia and Egypt were polytheistic societies. The flooding of the rivers had to do with the consistency of the gods. In both societies priests are at the top of the class system. They play a major part in religion. The gods were pictured differently in these societies. A few of the Egyptian gods were Ra, Anubis, and Osiris. A few of the Mesopotamian gods were Ashur, Anu, and Enki .…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was a monarchy and Mesopotamia was a democracy. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was in charge of making laws and owned everything, meanwhile, in Mesopotamia, there were many kings in different city-states and they did not own people’s belongings. A difference is that the land was measured differently. In Mesopotamia, they divided the land into city-states. Also, both civilizations thought differently about their kings. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered a god. Meanwhile, Mesopotamia believed that the kings weren’t gods so they didn’t worship them as gods. At one point, when the Assyrians were expanding a lot, the city-state got cut up into provinces. The ancient egyptians wrote hieroglyphics about the profits, costs and laws civilians made. In Mesopotamia, the scribes would draw pictograms on clay boards. While Egyptians trusted their justice goddess to teach right from wrong among their citizens, Mesopotamians would follow Hammurabi's law that demanded and Eye for an Eye. With this law, the offended person would be free to do the same thing he suffered at the hands of the criminal. In Mesopotamia would have a voice and a vote for city matters as going to war or not meanwhile Egypt didn’t have a voice. Everything was decided by the Pharaoh. So after all, there are differences and similarities between these dissimilar civilizations that…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Maya and the Egyptians constructed these enormous pyramids that in a way stand as memorials to their ancient civilizations. The Mayan built shrines, temples, and pyramids in honor of their gods, and their kings. Most of the Mayan pyramids were temples to the gods, the Maya did sometimes bury their rulers, but the temple always remained on the top of the pyramid no matter what. Mayan pyramids were not only burial tombs like Egyptian pyramids, whose primary purpose was funerary, containing mortuary chambers. Egyptians had temples also, but theirs would be somewhere near the pyramid or right next to it, for the ceremonial services, but it was never placed on top of the structure because Egypt's pyramids come to a point at the top (The…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mayan civilization wasnt one empire, but rather various groups of people with common cultural backgrounds. Maya writing was composed of recorded inscriptions on stone and wood and used within architecture. In both the priesthood and the ruling class, nepotism was apparently the prevailing system under which new members were chosen. Primogeniture was the form under which new kings were chosen as the king passed down his position to his son.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays