Preview

Compare And Contrast Egypt And Chinese Empires

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Egypt And Chinese Empires
Ancient China and Egypt were very successful empires; however, there were also some setbacks keeping them from great success. Some of these barriers were due to the selfish rulers, weak armies, and the landscape. These early setbacks in civilizations were difficult to manage and effectively brought upon their downfall.
During the final period in the reign of the tenth empire, Ancient China was in turmoil and vassals from other countries that began to rebel. Despite this turmoil and impending uprising, Emperor Zhou led a luxurious life and tortured both his ministers and people. This intensified conflicts across the kingdom and the empire was finally overthrown, ending the long reign of the Shang Dynasty in Chinese history. This explains why other dynasties in China prospered over others; for example, the Qin Dynasty lasted longer than the Han Dynasty because it was very fair and not so cruel and unjust to people. If China had a more benevolent, sage, unselfish, fair, and peaceful emperor, their dynasty may have lasted longer.
…show more content…
Instead, governors of administrative divisions called nomes were required to raise armies. When a force was needed, all the armies of the nomes would come together, and they would be commanded by the pharaoh. However, this created another problem for pharaoh, because the nomes would occasionally create rival factions and compete for the monarchy, in which case they needed to be forcibly suppressed through military action by the pharaoh. Also, Egypt conquered Kush and ruled for more than 500 years. Military actions were not taken to control the land and thus, they lost control of their lands and weakened. For this reason, Nubia, led by Piye, the King of Kush, pushed Egypt out of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The later years of the Tang Empire saw increasing turmoil as a result of conflict with Tibetans and Turkic Uighurs.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cycle of founding of a dynasty by a great king and ending a dynasty with the ousting of an evil king continued with the Shang Dynasty. The final, tyrannical king of the Shang is commonly called King Zhou. He killed his own son, tortured and murdered his ministers and was overly influenced by his concubine.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question: Compare the development of traditions and institutions in any TWO of the following major civilizations.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and the Shang-Zhou Dynasty were both powerful and influential civilization who faced similar ideas in their government, and defense strategies, but differed when it came to cultural rituals, and the use of natural resources.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Emperor of China and Rome’s Augustus Caesar both helped shape their kingdoms into great empires, but their tactics in doing so are every different. The First emperor of China took a more direct approach to his leadership. He concurred all the land around him and changed many laws to restrict his citizens from freedoms. Augustus Caesar was considered a peoples person and often attended live shows and plays. He believed that thru peace and harmony his country would be able to thrive. These great leaders both achieved dominance and power throughout their leadership but only one of them died as a hero while the other died as a hated man. In this paper I will compare and contrast the ways these leaders shaped their countries and the effect it had on the way their people viewed them.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consolidating the Roman and Chinese Empires 1. both empires defined themselves in universal terms 2. both invested heavily in public works 3. both claimed supernatural sanctions a. deceased Roman emperors as gods (imperial cult) i. persecution of Christians for nonparticipation in cult b. Chinese emperor as Son of Heaven i. rule by Mandate of Heaven ii. dependent on just rule iii. heavy ritual duties to maintain relationship between earth and heaven iv. moral government spelled out by writings of Confucius and his followers The Han Dynasty was heir to the Qin state that had unified China in 221 BCE. The first ruler of the Qin established the title of “emperor.” The power of a Chinese emperor was absolute; however, he was subject to various checks on his authority by both high officials and imperial family members. The Romans practiced emperor worship solely in the case of dead emperors. In addition, only certain emperors were accorded divine honors, and always after death. In other parts of the Empire, however, local customs merged with Roman ones. In Egypt, for instance, emperor worship was practiced more widely. This was because the Roman office of emperor combined with the Egyptian notion as Pharaohas-sun-god. Chinese emperors were not considered divine beings. The emperor was called the “Son of Heaven” and was responsible for conducting sacrifices to both Heaven and Earth. The word “Heaven” referred more or less to what we would call “nature”: the succession of day and night, and the motions of the stars and planets. During the first millennium BCE, the concept of the “Mandate of Heaven” was applied. If an emperor oppressed the people, Heaven could withdraw a dynasty’s right to govern.…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman empire and the Han dynasty were both very successful and powerful civilizations but ended due…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civilization. The word “civilization” comes from the Latin term for “city.” The first civilizations were the river-valley civilizations, so-called because they all developed alongside major rivers to secure an adequate water supply for agricultural production. 2 of the greatest river-valley civilizations were Mesopotamia and Egypt. All though they both supported having a patriarchal leader or king, Egypt had a strong, centralized government, whereas Mesopotamia was decentralized, and built based on small city-states operating independently.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This semester I have conducted research on two of history 's most, in my opinion, distinct and strongest societies. The first one is the civilization of Ancient Egypt. It lasted from 3100BC to 1085BC. That 's about 2,015 years. The second society is the Roman Empire. Rome, as an empire, lasted from 31BC to 476AD. That 's only about 507 years, but that doesn 't span all of Rome 's history as a whole; the Roman Empire is only a portion of Rome 's history. While both of these societies are timeless civilizations, Rome was monotheistic, more technologically advanced, and more economically advanced, while Egypt was polytheistic, more academically advanced, and they still relied…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around 5,000 years ago early civilizations settled near rivers. Ancient China civilizations established on the Huang-He River Valley, while early Mesopotamian civilizations settled near the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley. While both Huang-He River Valley and Mesopotamia have similar politics they also differed in the interactions with the environment and economics.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays