Preview

Compare And Contrast Deborah White And O Malley's Tavern

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Deborah White And O Malley's Tavern
Courtroom Observation
82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern

Liberty University
Busi 301

The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.

On that Saturday night at the tavern is where everything began. July 28, 2007, Gary
…show more content…
The patron Edward Hart had consumed eleven drinks in a span of two hours while he was at the tavern. Regardless of how well you can hold your alcohol that much in that short of time would seem enough visible evidence to prove drunkenness, not to mention the six shots in which he consumed in just under thirty minutes. He had also been seen falling out of his stool and tripping over a pool stick as he attempted to get out of his seat. Mr. Hards BAC was later recorded as being 2.0 which is above the legal limit of .08 as determined by the police report. Daniels admitted that Hard looked intoxicated while leaving and the evidence on the bar tab supports this by showing Hard had consumed 13 alcoholic drinks while being served by Mr.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bar Owner Case Brief

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In opposition to Becks’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff introduced the affidavit of John Holbrook, a professor in…

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The matters raised were the same as those previously decided and there had been no material change in the circumstances to warrant revisiting them. The Court noted,"… what is before the Court is a preliminary discovery application, not Ben-Hur. The interests of justice are not served in comparatively modest procedural litigation… by permitting no stone to go…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Greer filed a motion for summary judgment in October, 1990, seeking to have Austin's case dismissed on the grounds that it was barred by T.C.A. § 32-4-108 (1986), because it was brought more than two years from the entry of the order admitting the will to probate. The trial court denied this motion.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Judgment Rule

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    [2] [pic]Initially, St. Paul contends that this action is barred by the “one final judgment” rule. In support of its argument, St. Paul cites cases which set forth the doctrine of res judicata. St. Paul reasons that the judgment T & R obtained against Capitol after arbitration precludes any subsequent proceedings against St. Paul because a second action between the same parties on the same claim is impermissible (citing Clark v. Lesher (1956) 46 Cal.2d 874, 880, 299 P.2d 865).…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    will be given a date for a summary trial. However, even if the magistrates agree…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The District Court denied Respondents' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and upon appeal; the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and ordered the District Court to enter said Preliminary Injunction. The Petitioner approached the United States Supreme Court who granted them a Writ of Certiorari and after consideration, vacated the Judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment Case

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [1] Plaintiff purported to appeal from the order granting summary judgment, which is not an appealable order. (Modica v. Merin (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 1072, 285 Cal.Rptr. 673.) We will construe plaintiff 's notice of appeal as an appeal from the judgment which was entered and which appears in the record on appeal. (Rule 2(c), California Rules of Court.)…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Briefs outlines legal arguments and set aside judgment for the appellee that it not set aside previous ruling…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    State of Georgia v Davis

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schmalleger, Frank J. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 10th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions, 01/2013. VitalBook file.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polovchak V Meese

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Was the entry of summary judgment on behalf of the parents proper? Was the remedy appropriate given due consideration to both the parents and the child?…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outrage of a Talk Show Host

    • 2984 Words
    • 12 Pages

    DISPOSITION: ORDERED that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.…

    • 2984 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The OYEZ. (2006). The supreme court | pbs. In Thirteen/WNET New York. Retrieved from http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our short weekend trip to New York to visit friends started out fine, just like any other time. We had no idea this one was going to be much more eventful and not in a good way. Just as I asked my sister “Can this day get any worse?” It did get worse.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    case competition

    • 6650 Words
    • 27 Pages

    THE CASE 2008 | FULL VERSION CBS Case Competition Copyright © 2008 CBS Case Competiton www.casecompetition.com Thank you On behalf of CBS Case Competition 2008 the case writers wish to thank Bang & Olufsen A/S Interviews Alberto de Lucio, Head of Bang & Olufsen Southern Europe, B&O Carsten Sander, Senior Director Scandinavia and Baltic, B&O Flemming Møller Pedersen, Senior Director, Idea Factory, B&O Flemming Nielsen, Sales Director, Enterprise, B&O Henrik Messel, Senior Director, Technology and Platform, B&O Kasper Eis, Director, Global Marketing, B&O Lars Flyvholm, Director, Product and Business Management, B&O Lars Topholm, Securities Analyst, Carnegie Peter Petersen, Director, Business Innovation, B&O Peter Thostrup, Executive Vice President, B&O Torben Ballegaard Sørensen, former CEO, B&O Song, video and layout Pernille Zillmer (speak) Philip Vensby, Tranzistor Søren Raasted (property rights)…

    • 6650 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    American Cyanamid essay1

    • 1357 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An interlocutory injunction is an equitable remedy, which temporarily prohibits the defendant, from continuing a particular activity. The purpose of this injunction is to maintain the status quo or preserve the subject matter so that no permanent harm is done to the rights of the applicant before a court hearing or trial. Given the nature of the relief the courts have taken a variety of factors into account in exercising its discretion to grant or not grant the relief. It is for this reason the American Cyanamid case came about, as it attempted to furnish the courts with a judicial structure or judicial guidelines, which may aid in determining whether an interlocutory remedy should be granted. However it is noteworthy that Prior to the American Cyanamid case, the court employed a different test to determine whether or not the relief should be granted. It has been argued that the decision of the American Cyanamid reformulated that old test and as such is a complete break away from settled principles. However upon close examination of the new principles established in the case, it is seen that the test simply made minor procedural changes as such the substantive element remained the same. Thus it would not be correct to state bluntly that the decision in the American Cyanamid case is a complete breakaway from the settled principles upon which an interlocutory injunction is granted.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays