Preview

Compare and Contrast the Contributions and Achievements of Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King to the Civil Rights Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast the Contributions and Achievements of Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King to the Civil Rights Movement
Although Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez came from very different backgrounds, their success as leaders of the Civil Rights Movement bears many similarities in its historic development. One major similarity between King and Chavez is that they were both great orators and made a number of notable speeches, which contributed to the social advancement of the minorities. King, who was ordained as a Baptist minister at the age of 27, was often put in the position to preach about what he believed in to large numbers of people. As a result, he was quite comfortable speaking to thousands at gatherings such as the historic March on Washington. Chavez, on the other hand, came from a poor migrant family and initially worried that he wasn't a good speaker. At the meetings he organised, Chavez often ended up doing more listening then speaking. However with time, his confidence grew as he found people listening and agreeing with what he had to say and so made many great speeches as did King. Their lectures and remarks made clear their selfless devotion to their causes and gave the blacks and Chicanos a new sense of worth and dignity which made them want improvements and change even more.

They were also both very charismatic strong leaders, inspiring men and women, young and old and most vitally both coloured and whites to join their movements for equality. Each of these men also realised the importance of getting national support from vast numbers that helped them to achieve their aims. Chavez did this through appealing for a nationwide boycott of lettuce with people from all parts of the United States, who sympathised with the cause of the farm workers, refusing to buy it. Later a grape boycott was added to this, which according to a poll in 1975, led to 17 million Americans boycotting grapes. Finally, in 1978 some of the workers conditions were met and the boycotts were lifted.

A major achievement of both King and Chavez is how they both managed to pass a number of acts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King showed was collaborativeness. The reason the protests were so successful was because Dr. King had everyone collaborating with one another to get the problem solved. The pigs, who were in charge, would not collaborate or help with any of the work on the farm, but would assign work to all the other animals “under the superintendence of the pigs” (Orwell 38). The pigs were not supportive, collaborative, or helpful when it came to doing work on the farm. This put more work and stress on the other animals. Dr. King, on the other hand, was very helpful and collaborated with his people in the fight for equality. Dr. King was also “travelling constantly speaking for “justice” throughout the country.” (“Martin”). Martin Luther King Jr. had a big impact in the movement because he collaborated with everyone on issues. When everyone came together the problem at hand got solved faster. Being collaborative with one another was very beneficial and had a positive impact in the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cesar Chavez based labor experience, worked with four different innovations to break the tradition and create a strong lasting union, along with his co-founder Dolores Huerta, which had worked together since the CSO. Dolores Huerta challenged gender roles, and as a woman established a good image of what women are able to do. She was one of the most influential organizers of the time, she belong to different organization and overall was not afraid to speak up. She would travel to different places, and in every location, she would leave a mark. Furthermore, Chavez’s strategies where strikes, marches, boycotts, and fasting, and each one of these techniques build on top of each other to create a sense of hope for a better future. However, what set this organization aside was that it was a social movement. It all started in Delano, where farm workers demanded higher wages. It was during that strike that the NFWA joined the AWOC’s Larry Itliong worked together to get things done. During their strikes challenges arose, growers were attempting to fight back using strikebreakers, but none of this was possible because the workers will and drive was greater than their rivals. An example of loyal farm workers would be Pablo Camacho; “…he did his job on the picket lines, went to the membership meetings and argued forcefully with his fellow workers about the importance of the union,” (Bardake, 2011, 8). It was dedicated people like Camacho that the union was…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By using Dr. King’s name, he communicates he identifies with him and increases his credibility in the reader’s eyes. Furthermore, he references Ghandi while discussing boycotts. In doing so, he asks the reader to think back to Ghandi’s role in the Indian independence movement. Chavez links his name to his argument, and has the reader connect his successes to his argument. By using these two historical characters, he bases his argument on…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He held several strikes, boycotts, led marches, and went on hunger strikes. He fasted to raise awareness about the dangers of pesticides in the fields. Influential Americans mentioned, “His goal was to overthrow a farm labor system in the nation which treats farm workers as if they were not human beings” (Cesar). An article about the grape boycott said, “In September 1967, Chavez started a nationwide boycott of California grapes in support of farm workers’ rights” (Exploring). Cesar was able to gather many people to help protest. Growers thought that Cesar’s group was filled with “ dangerous agitators” and felt that they were disrupting a peaceful community. Police became cautious of strikes and even recorded the strikers’ names. As a result of this, Strikers were forbidden to disturb the peace and the word huelga (which means strike) was banned. Eventually, Cesar Chavez was able to get workers to sign contracts with the union and they gained their rights and were able to get higher wages and safer working conditions. This was a great victory for Cesar Chavez and…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cesar Chavez insisted that the union adhere to nonviolence. He envisioned a union for helping the workers’ problems. In 1970, Chavez led the UFW in a fight against lettuce growers and other agribusinesses. Cesar Chavez led protests to call attention to the problems immigrant workers had. In the mid 1960s he launched a chalifarni grape. By 1970 most grape growers had signed…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Nelson Mandela and Cesar Chavez stood up for what is right. Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison for trying to overthrow the Pro-Apartheid Government. After Nelson Mandela left prison, he worked to achieve Human Rights and a better future for everyone in South Africa. Nelson Mandela was born in…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was an individual that changed the world by bringing racism to attention, and providing ways to end it. Martin Luther King Jr. was a very powerful individual in the Civil Rights movement. When Rosa Parks was arrested for not giving up her seat, groups in the black community came together to organize a boycott of the Montgomery buses. The Montgomery Improvement Association chose Martin Luther King Jr. to be the MIA’s president because they knew he would lead the group positively (Martin Luther King, Jr.,1992). MLK also led lots of marches. Martin Luther King, Jr. was also elected president for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. King and other leaders traveled around the world to try and end segregation. King would give speeches and influence officials that racism is a problem (Martin Luther King, Jr., 1992). King also led the March on Washington. The March on Washington was to bring racial inequality to attention. The focus of the March of Washington was to also increase jobs and economic stability for African-Americans. This march was also to encourage the Congress to pass the Civil Rights Bill (Martin Luther King, Jr., 1992). Martin Luther King, Jr. was also very well known for his empowering speech. The “I Have a Dream” speech was very emotional, and it impacted everyone in a different way. The speech was about how there is an equality issue in America. In his speech, Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “This note was a promise that all men,…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rooted in social crisis, both movements rose out of a deep feeling of inequality. Even if the causes seem different, we see, through the demands both movements make, that what triggers those movements is rooted in the same reality. Complaints about a corrupt political system, growing social inequalities, ongoing violence inside and outside the country... Either in the 1960s or nowadays, those issues created an urge in people's mind who figured that it was about time to do something, to remind their government and leaders that they could not act with complete impunity in a so called representative democracy.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mlk Vs Malcolm X Essay

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the fifties and sixties, two main figureheads campaigned for equal African American civil rights, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Although both aimed to end the divide of inequality and racism, they went about in leading this change in very different ways. Malcolm X was influenced by his hate of white supremacy and need racial separation, yet equality, through any means necessary. While Martin Luther King Jr was motivated by his want for racial equality and complete integration through peace. Both leaders used public speeches and their faith to influence the public however King focused on success through peaceful protest and civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed in pushing where it hurt and forcing whites to accept blacks as…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "We demand to be treated like the men we are! We are not slaves and we are not animals," Cesar Chavez said after a speech he gave during 1968, so as a saying "Si Se Puede" (Yes You Can)(Cesar Chavez) get good working conditions ("Chavez foundation” n.p.). That same year the boycott of California table grape growers also known as "La Causa" rose. It ended during the 1970s, 17 million Americans for it Robert Kennedy was a great supporter. Later Chavez goes on a 25-day hunger strike and attracts national attention – it was a non violent fast. In 1988 he undertakes a 36-day "Fast For Life"(Cesar Chavez) attention to the health hazards farm workers and their children expose to…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Venezuela gained independence those in the middle and upper class were white European decent. When majority were African and native American dencent, European decent were a minority huge disproportion of wealth. When Hugo Chavez was elected he was able to break free of foreign corporation oil control and took control of oil back. Used the money from the oil and used to reduce poverty. Cut poverty from 48.6 in 2002 to 29.8 in 2011 and extreme poverty by 70%. He built public schools, house, expanded public health care and done a lot for those on the bottom. He provided people who were living in terrible conditions the right to life, liberty and security of person. That leaders before him didn’t. Sure it is legitimate to protest against the rise in crime, government corruption and high inflation rates, but these are issues that shouldn’t be leading to violence and disruption of…

    • 2302 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cesar Chavez

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cesar Chavez viewed his civil rights issues as not just another movement, but a movement to change the conditions of human life. He followed the teachings of Gandhi, who helped India obtain their independence from England through nonviolent actions. When landowners threatened Chavez, he called a boycott on grapes throughout the whole country which was a great success because even though this he obtained support from various organizations and people. His and nonviolent strategies caught the attention of the people and proved to be a success.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cesar Chavez

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many peoples goal is to achieve greatness. Some are born great and some are made great. But how does one achieve greatness? Being such can really impact more than people around, it can impact a whole world. It is not necessary to be Harvard educated to be that person, neither the next Steve Jobs. All you have to be is a person with positive character to make a positive change in a place with negative attitude. Cesar Chavez, among many others, has opened and created many pathways to a better future, either literally or psychologically. Chavez's impact is still felt world wide and lives between the people. He had made change in an area that needed to fixed, farm labor. His influence would help many children, women, and men receive their rights as equal citizens of the US. With teamwork, cooperation, collaboration, service to others, and education success is possible. These are the things Chavez emphasized and with it changed lifestyles and most importantly achieved greatness.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cesar Chavez

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chavez fought for the legal rights of farm workers, and for clean drinking water in the fields, as well as the right to have access to use bathrooms. These little changes helped my family a lot. Cesar also formed Cesar Chavez's movement inspired the founding of two Midwestern independent unions: Obreros Unidos in Wisconsin in 1966, and the Farm Labor Organizing Committee in Ohio in 1967. Former Union Farmer Workers organizers would also found the Texas Farm Workers Union in 1975. He also led varies protests. An example would be his protest against pesticide. His protest led to many changes in the fields.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many individuals have attempted to start a union for farm workers. The only one to succeed, however, was Cesar Chavez. He was a man with great qualities. He had a clear goal, courage, he was willing to sacrifice and he was for the people and with the people. Cesar Chavez was an effective leader because he was for the people, practiced non-violent protest, and boycotted the grape industry.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays