Preview

company law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1697 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
company law
Question 1
a)
i) Advantages:
The first major advantage is by having two people running the business gives the business a lot more flexibility about how to operate compare to sole traders.
The second major advantage is the low administration requirements compare to form a company. Disadvantages
The first major disadvantage is for partnership there are unlimited liability for Andy and Zara.
The second major disadvantage is there is no separation between Andy and Zara to manage and control the business. ii) Advantages:
The first major advantage is the company has limited liability for shareholders.
The second major advantage is the share of the company allow for transfer and expansion.
Disadvantages:
The first major disadvantage is the cost for compliance and rigorous regulation, especially for small business.
The second major disadvantage is separation of ownership and control often not appropriate for SMEs.

b)
i) Andy and Zara are not personally liable to Mungo, as they entered the lease as company “Young”. The shareholders are not reliable for any debts of the company.
Andy and Zara are personally liable to Wolf, as when they borrow the money it requires personal guarantee. The bank has the right to take their home away if they can’t repay the debt.
Andy and Zara are not personally liable to Tweed, as they buy computers as company “Young”. The shareholders are not reliable for any debts of the company.

ii) If Andy and Zara were running the business as a partnership, they would be personally liable to Mungo, as they have unlimited liability for any debts of the business.
Andy and Zara are personally liable to Wolf as they provided personal guarantee.
If Andy and Zara were running the business as a partnership, they would be personally liable to Tweed, as they have unlimited liability for any debts of the business.

C)
i)
Under section 5 of the Companies Act 1993 a company will be a subsidiary of another company if that other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law Ch 4

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    17-3. Daniel is not liable for the debt Rubya defaulted on. The contract did not make Rubya a partner, even those she was given profit sharing and management responsibilities, she did not poses any ownership of the business. Also under UPA 202(c)(3) no presumption of partnership is made since the profits are wages of an employee or for the services of an independent contractor. Not to mention Daniel did not have any knowledge of the credit extended to Rubya.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LIT1 Task 1 - A

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Control – One of the biggest advantages is autonomy of the business. Without any bosses, partners or corporate rules, the owner has free reign of his or her own business.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 2 Study Questions

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The key advantages are with both corporations and investors which can have success and include the guarantee that their investment is provided at a reasonable market value, as well as the capability to assist companies in raising new capital. For one it offers a nonstop market, Second it sets up and advertises…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Issue 1: Does any of those parties mentioned above have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? If so, are they liable for a negligent misstatement for the loss of Frank and Belinda?…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Sample Questions

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jack and Jill were living together. Jack wanted to start a small retail store, but did not have good credit. Jill, whose credit was excellent, signed loan agreements with Jack so he could borrow the money to start the business. Jack used business cards that stated he was the "owner" of the business. He and Jill filed separate tax returns. Jack stated he was self-employed and claimed the business was a sole proprietorship. The money that was earned from the store was placed into a joint checking account owned and used by Jack and Jill. When there were significant decisions to be made about the business, such as deciding to franchise the business, the decision was made jointly by Jack and Jill.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You run a successful paper mill and send out your three best personnel to secure new wood pulp sources using due diligence and skill. Applying the agency principles outlined in this chapter, answer the following questions. Delilah, does not return with wood pulp, but brings back three contracts. Acting within the scope of her authority, she contracted with Evon, who knew your identity at the time; Felipe, who knew that Delilah was acting on behalf of someone but not whom; and Giorgio, who did not know that Delilah was acting on anyone’s behalf. For which contracts, if any, are you liable? For which contracts, if any, is Delilah liable? Explain.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Businesses are force to comply with the unnecessary, costly entry and exit procedures (Parrino, Kidwell, & Bates, 2012).…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | If you are named in the business you are a partner and also liable…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only disadvantage is that for a new company they should have waited for a few years of growth and development in order to take such a step. The disadvantage of loosing money.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John did not follow through with his performance that was stated in the contract between himself and Mark. I think that John is liable for Marks extra expenses to house the dogs because he had a breach of contract. In chapter seventeen it talks about tender which is, “a timely offer or expression of wellnesses to pay a debt or perform an obligation.” I think that John should do this because what John did by delaying the closing date of the house made Mark must spend extra money to house his dogs until the new closing date of the…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law Course Wrap Up

    • 3688 Words
    • 15 Pages

    We have come to the end of formal instruction in Company Law, so it is useful at this point to review the main learnings from the course. This will be somewhat long! Unit1 Salomon v Salomon and the corporate veil. This is a foundational case in company law which enunciated the principle of the separateness of company and its members (shareholders and officers). The principle makes it quite clear that the separation of the company from its members will always hold; it is only in exceptional cases that the corporate veil will be lifted, such as in instances of fraud or other illegality. This means that a company may contract in its own name and, similarly, be held liable for breaches committed in its name. As mentioned before, shareholders and officers of the company will not usually be held liable for acts committed by the company. This leads directly to the concept of limited liability. Since a company is a separate legal entity, it follows that its members will not be liable for its debts. As a distinct legal entity, a company’s assets belong to it and not its members; its liabilities belong to it and are not the responsibility of the members. In the event of the company becoming insolvent or bankrupt, a shareholder’s loss would only be limited to the amount of unpaid shares he has outstanding in the company. In this way, a shareholder is afforded limited liability. Conversely, unlimited liability companies impose unlimited liability on its members. Ultra Vires. Ultra vires describes acts undertaken beyond (ultra) the legal powers (vires) of those who have purported to undertake them. The three main applications of ultra vires were: o whether the company acted outside is capacity; o whether the company’s agents acted in excess of authority; and o whether the company’s act was contrary to statutory provisions. This proved to create great difficulties for creditors as they might provide goods and services to…

    • 3688 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case of Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio[1] and Blomley v Ryan[2] demonstrate the bank’s conduct were unconscionable. The court look at 3 main elements to determining whether to activate the doctrine of unconscionability.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Salomon Case

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr.Salomon was a wealthy man and he was a boot and shoe manufacturer trading on his own sole account. In 1982, he decided to convert the business into a limited company. Fot this purpose, “Aron Salomon and Company Limited” was formed with liability limited by shares. The memorandum of the company was subscribed by Aron Salomon, his wife and five of his children. The intention of having his own family members in the memorandum is to retain the business in their own hands. The company purchased the business for £39,000 and the price was satisfied by a sum amounting to £20,000 was paid to Aron Salomon who then immediately returned it to the company in exchange for fully paid shares; a sum amounting to £10,000 was paid in debentures for the like amount and the balance sum with the exception of about £1,000 which Aron Salomon seemed have received and retained went in discharge of the debts and liabilities of the business at the time of purchase.Apart from the fully paid shares, Aron Salomon received for his business about £1,000 in cash and £10,000 in debentures.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 5 Nau!

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Will Nau’s approach have a limited appeal, or do you think it has staying power? What drawbacks might there be to what Nau is doing?…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics