However, with the Common Core Standards, these teachers have a time limit, where they can’t go off topic and strictly have to follow the curriculum so they can enable their student to pass the test at the end of the year. It is uncomfortable for the educators to quickly change up their old teaching styles or learn new techniques to accommodate the standards and help their students, overall, at the end of the year.
The Common Core Standards does not promote creativity or other subjects in its tests and curriculum. The curriculum of the Common Core only includes English and Mathematics because those are the subjects that are tested at the end of the school year. There is barely a spot open for teachers to implement creative skills, physical education, social studies, and science. There are no national tests at the end of the year that deals with those subjects so it is not a priority. The United States Department Of Education’s (DOE) surveys show that “Social Studies, the Sciences, Physical Education and the Arts being cut by 32 to 35% to allow for more preparation to be spent on Math and English, the standardized test subjects” (Stevenson 8). These subjects are prevalent in …show more content…
The negatives of this initiative outweigh the positives of it. It is not understandable by teachers, creativity and other subjects are not tested in the tests, and teachers’ curriculum is based so they can teach the test at the end of the year. If adults wouldn’t want to be force fed information and work just so they can get promoted, then why would they want the children in school to do