Preview

Citizens United: the Death Knell of Democracy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Citizens United: the Death Knell of Democracy
Ethan Matthew Aaron Cetnar
Professor Valerie Baehl
English 101
15 November 2012
Citizens United the Death Knell of Democracy In 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the Federal Elections Commission v. Citizens United, a case that will have drastic effects on our political system. Large corporations and labor unions will now have unprecedented influence over America’s national, state, and local elections. If Congress does not overturn the Supreme Court ruling on Citizens United then, as a result, the decision has the potential to lead to political corruption, the increase of voter apathy, and the drowning out of third party ideas. Soon our country’s political system will no longer work for the good of its citizens, but rather be beholden to whomever has the most money to contribute. The Supreme Court decision on the Citizens United case is one of the most devastating court decisions in our country’s history, but many people know little to nothing about the landmark case. Citizens United is a conservative non-profit organization, and in 2008 they attempted to violate federal campaign laws by distributing a documentary critical of Sen. Hillary Clinton. The law Citizens Untied violated was the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act that prohibits, “Broadcast advertisements mentioning a candidate within 30 days before a primary or 60 days before a general election” (par. 19). As a result, the Federal Election Commission blocked the film and Citizens United sued on the grounds that it violated their first amendment right to free speech; however, Citizens United lost the case in Federal Court, but they appealed and the case went before the Supreme Court. The question proposed before the court was whether Citizens United should have been allowed to show the Clinton documentary. According to Adam Liptak, a political columnist for The New York Times, “Instead, the court addressed the questions it proposed to the parties in June when it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging, the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views, both political and those of other concerns, are guaranteed. What happens, however, when your own government seizes and destroys these rights, in its attempt to censor the public 's pursuit of political knowledge. The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case brings forth this question and many more, as Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, was challenged in their attempt to broadcast "Hillary: the movie," by the FEC. The verdict, which was ruled in favor of Citizens United, deemed the film an act of the organization 'a first amendment right to free speech. Correct in their ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the abolition of restrictions…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court’s controversial decision in its 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision to ban limits on independent political expenditures by corporations incited a massive national dialogue over the issue of corporate personhood and corporations’ rights to free speech. Though politicians, including the President of the United States, and political commentators have referred to the decision as a shocking affront to democracy, the decision stands upon jurisprudence extending back nearly 150 years. The essential question that campaign finance issues beg is whether or not money should be considered speech. In this paper, I will argue that it is impossible to separate speech from the money that enables its dissemination. Further, I have developed…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citizens United v. FEC allowed for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wanted in order to convince the public either to vote for or against a candidate. They are protected by the First Amendment, which allows for them to have unlimited spending. However, the Supreme Court argued that it is illegal for corporations or labor unions to give money directly to candidate. The Supreme Court argued that if corporations or labor unions give money directly to a candidate, it could lead to corruption. Ultimately, I agree with the Supreme Court decision that it is illegal for them to do this and agree that they can persuade the public through other methods. For instance, corporations and labor unions can persuade the public through ads…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Democracy is deified as a government ruled by its people, a society represented by its own members forming a self deciding and self governed community. This very essential ideal established the founders of the United States has become harder to uphold, and there are restraints that do not allow for true democracy to be fully expressed. Extra-governmental actions by special interests and the intricate costs of campaigns has married the economic and political arenas and it has resulted the creation of heavily influenced representatives that no longer serve their original function- to represent the interest of their constituents. The functionality of today’s political system would be unrecognizable to that of the original Constitution and that of the founders. The absence of term limits of House and Senate representatives have causes two elements that infringes on the democratic value of the government of the United States; now members of the congress and senate are career politicians and hold office for many ulterior reasons other than the honor of public service, and secondly this notion has now created a political class an exclusive society that dictates the legislative process. An Amendment to the Constitution is necessary to overturn the previous institutional establishment of limitless terms for senators and house representatives, because amendments are the only way to modify the articles of the constitution. [1]…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debates about the Citizens United case have been ripe throughout the entire country. In the case, the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that company broadcasts could not be limited. In addition, they ruled that there was no cap on company funding on candidates, but that there had to be a middleman of a superpac. Setting dangerous future implications, this decisions greatly undermines the future democracy of the country through condoning skewed political power based on wealth and by giving first amendment right to a company (Citizens 1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is generally understood that the United States is built upon the principles of democracy, in which the majority consensus of the citizens helps to define the shape of issues or elections. However, in assuming that the Constitution - the document upon which such practices are founded – is inherently democratic is only partially accurate. Indeed, it has been frequently argued that the U. S. Constitution is representative of the rule of law from a federation as opposed to a pure democracy; in a federation, elections occur among the majority of the citizenry but this process results in elected officials who then determine the direction of the country. In short, a federation transforms a democracy from the rule of the many back into the rule of the few, with the “few” in this sense being the elected officials selected through an elections process.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, most American politicians are “fundraisers first and legislators second,” which has numerous consequences (Sarbanes). Congressman John Sarbanes estimated that congressmen devote 30 to 70 percent of their time to fundraising -time that could be spent creating legislation and learning about policy issues (Lieu). Additionally, the unrestricted private campaign donations are undermining democracy, in a sense “buying the government,” while the people’s interests shift to the back seat. To reduce gridlock, we need our congress members time and energy devoted to legislation, and their votes dedicated to the people, not solely the Big Money minority. In accordance with the views of many grassroots leaders, I believe that we need a comprehensive overhaul of the election system. The first step is the reversal of Citizens United, a court case that led to the creation of super PAC’s when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot limit corporations (or unions, associations or individuals) from spending money to influence the outcome of elections (Liptak). The second step involves transferring power back to the people. As Lawrence Lessig, academic scholar and political activist, points out, “So long as elections cost money, we won’t end Congress’s dependence on its funders (Lessig).” Therefore, our second step must be to adopt a system of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fec vs. Citizens United

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment has been one of the most controversial issues surrounding the Constitutions since its ratification in 1787. The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Many people disagree on the extent of power the First Amendment actually has on the right to free speech. One of the most controversial issues surrounding the First Amendment is how much influence a company can have over elections and campaigns. Huge corporations are known to pay billions of dollars to endorse certain politicians, and in turn the politicians pass legislation benefitting the corporation. Is this fair, or even legal? The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission dove right into the issue. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was an important United States Supreme Court case in which it was decided that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting political expenditures by corporations and unions. Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, produced a political controversial video on Senator Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 primary elections, known as Hillary: The Movie. The documentary covered Hillary Clinton's life while in the Senate, the White House as First Lady and during her bid for presidential Democratic nominee. However, the documentary falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA")-a federal enactment designed to prevent "big money" from unfairly influencing federal elections. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that BCRA violated the First Amendment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super PACs

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political Action Committees have been around for decades. However, prior to 2010, PACs were only allowed to accept up to $2,500 per individual. Corporations and labor unions were NOT allowed to make contributions in any form or fashion. This money could then be given to political campaigns to be used for promoting their candidate. However two Supreme Court cases changed that in 2010. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruled that a television advertising for Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" was legal despite Citizens United’s protest that it unfairly and illegally advocated against the re-election of George Bush. Later that year, Speechnow.org v. FEC led to the ruling that the creation of independent expenditure-only groups, or Super PACs was constitutional so long as they did not coordinate directly with parties or candidates. Thus, the Super PAC was born.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The changing landscape in the country has contributed to the uptick in gridlock in Washington D.C. The Supreme Court case has given rise to Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs) which have contributed billions of dollars to negative media advertisement of rival candidates. An area to explore in regards to this case are the loopholes created and their consequences. For instance, nonprofits who are not legally required to disclose the names of their donors can function similar to Super PACs. In addition, American subsidiary corporations owned by a foreign parent company are allowed to contribute unlimited amounts of money to political committees. As a result, it is possible that foreign entities are influencing U.S. elections. We are sure no one wants that to occur given the 2016 U.S. Presidential election controversy. Our goal is to explore the origins of the Supreme Court case, noting that longstanding reforms to campaign contributions were overturned, and it’s devastating aftermath. If the money of a few wealthy individuals and organizations outweighs the power of ordinary citizens, everyone does have an equal voice. These circumstances deteriorate the voice of that latter group, as they do not have the power to donate as much to the political campaigns. In the meanwhile, citizen’s faith in their government has fallen as more money entered politics through these shady…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American politics is not a pure democracy, and has not been since its founding. Rather, it is a representative democracy, with elected selected by the elite few at the county’s founding, white men later down the road, all men even farther, then all citizens. However the introduction of Super PACs seem to tilt back the already money leaning scale to a time where more and more politicians focus on less and less funders.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One case that was brought to the United States Supreme court was the Cohen vs. California case. In this case, freedom of speech was the issue to be addressed in conjunction with the first…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss what interest groups are and the role that interest groups play in American politics and why it is important. Another thing that this paper will discuss is how interest groups have influenced American elections. American elections have been influenced with direct and indirect strategies to get a candidate elected. They have also been influenced wit the use of information. The direct strategies used where more in your face and out for everyone else to know about and where very effective. While the indirect strategies used may have been hidden and in the shadows they were also effective. The use of information was helpful to put things out into the world and it was also there to help the candidate that was being supported by the interest group gain popularity and/or publicity. Towards the end of the paper the role of interest groups and how they have influenced American elections should be understood.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Noam Chomsky

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ---. “The Corporate Takeover of U.S. Democracy.” In These Times. 3 Feb. 2010. Web. 31 Oct. 2012.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays