Preview

Christopher McCandless: The Romanticized Boy of the Wild

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Christopher McCandless: The Romanticized Boy of the Wild
After blowing some dust off the counter and inscribed plaque, you may find writings by a brilliant man. As you look out the window of an abandoned bus that was made into a temporary shelter in the Alaskan bush, located in the vast of white wilderness, you may wonder, “What was Christopher McCandless thinking?” McCandless began his fatal journey in 1990 after graduating from Oxford University and always had an urge to move and be nomadic. When Jon Krakauer published an article regarding Chris McCandless’ death in the Outside magazine, letters began pouring in from all around the nation. Many people believed Chris was a hero for following his dreams while others, like Craig Medred, believed Chris was a dumb teenager who hurt himself and others around him. In his article “McCandless’ Story Isn’t Really Told in the Book or the Film,” Craig Medred concludes Chris was mentally ill. Medred argues that Krakauer simply romanticized a schizophrenic man for solely one purpose: to benefit his writing; however, I disagree with Medred’s allegations to Krakauer and McCandless and believe Chris did what he felt was right: follow his dream. “Schizophrenia is a mental disorder that makes it difficult to tell the difference between real and unreal experiences, to think logically, to have normal emotional responses, and to behave normally in social situations.” (Schizophrenia, Google Health) There never was a time in the novel that Chris showed no emotion. For example, when Chris shot a moose in the wild and didn’t know how to properly preserve it and it spoiled; he expressed, “… I now wish I had never shot the moose. One of the greatest tragedies of my life.” (Krakauer, 167). Remorse, is that not a normal emotional response? Chris’s love for nature got in his way when he tried to feed himself because he felt we didn’t need to kill and eat other animals. Many still believe Chris to be mentally ill. “Many people have probably written about themselves in the third person at some time,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Finally in Chapter 8, the reader is given insight into the types of letters Krakauer received, after having previously written an article about McCandless, with most of the incoming mail giving harsh criticism on the young traveler's story for being mentally ill, and unprepared. Yet McCandless isn’t the only one to go off on to a far fetched adventure out into the Alaskan wilderness, as one school teacher put it, with Krakauer offering three other examples of others with stories like McCandless. These other stories of Rosellini, Waterman, and McCunn, also prove Christopher McCandless’s uniqueness despite there being similarities between him and of the many others who shared the same philosophy as McCandless. Different in a sense that McCandless,…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In April of 1992 a young man named Chris McCandless, from a prosperous and loving family, hitchhiked across the country to Alaska. He gave $25,000 of his savings to charity, left his car and nearly all of his possessions. He burned all the cash he had in his wallet, and created a new life. Four months later, his body was found in an abandoned bus. Jon Krakauer constructed a journalistic account of McCandless 's story. Bordering on obsession, Krakauer looks for the clues to the mystery that is Chris McCandless. What he finds is the intense pull of the wilderness on our imagination, the appeal of high-risk activities to young men. When McCandless 's mistakes turn out to be fatal he is dismissed for his naiveté. He was said by some to have a death wish, but wanting to die and wanting to see what one is capable of are too very different things. I began to ask myself if Chris really wasn 't as crazy as some people thought. Then I realized it was quite possible that the reason people thought he was crazy was because he had died trying to fulfill his dream. If he had walked away from his adventure like Krakauer, people would have praised him rather than ridicule. So I asked the question, "How does Krakauer 's life parallel Chris McCandlesses?"…

    • 1367 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christopher McCandless or Alexander Supertramp should be admired for his courage and noble idea to drop everything and go into the wild, with nothing but a backpack and in it was a book of Tolstoy, a book about native plants and berries, a .22 rifle with 400 rounds of ammunition, a writing implement, a journal, a camera, a 10 pound bag of rice, a small cooking utensil, matches, a knife, and some fishing twine and a hook, and the few clothes he had on his back. Chris was trying to find himself by leaving everything behind, yes Chris might have been a little reckless but you have to be a little reckless to go into the wild and hitchhike around the world. This quote support that's chris was just living and trying to find himself was, “...McCandless pitched his tent in the puny shade of a tamarick and basked in his newfound freedom. (Krakauer 27)” this is saying that McCandless was happy to finally be by himself and start life in the wild,…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris had gone to the wild to find what he needed; thruth and peace. “Alex admitted that the only food in his pack was a ten-pound bag of rice…He had no ax, no bug dope, no snow shoes, no compass.”(5). He believed he would’ve been able to find whatever he needed with the limited amount of supplies he had. While finding his truth and new identity in the wilderness, he did it in a manner that eventually killed him. Like Krakauer said, “Unlike McCandless, however, I have in my backpack a 1:63, 360-scale topographic map…Exquisitely detailed, it indicates that half a mile downstream, in the throat of the U.S. Geological Survey.”(173). McCandless would have been capable of finding his identity, truth, and peace in the wild and coming out alive if he would have more…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCandless the main character “Into The Wild” is a reckless and selfish human being. In the novel it states that “his family had no idea where he was or what had become of him until his remains turned up in Alaska.” He made his parents suffer not knowing where their son was at. Chris McCandless actions was clearly a sign of stupidity almost suicidal. He had chances to survive and turn this around. His first mistake…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1992 a man began his four month journey of leaving everything behind, college, family, and all his relationships to start a completely new life in the wild. In the book The Wild by Jon Krakauer, Chris McCandless recreates a new life for himself. while following his long journey, Chris renamed himself Alexander Supertramp and met many people along the way like Gallion, Franz, and Westerberg. Although some people think that Chris’s death has purpose, really Chris died in vain, alone in the woods.Chris proves this when he risks his life countless times and gets repeatedly questioned for it by friends along his trip. Chris wasted his time in the woods and could have lived if he listened to the people around him who were trying to help him.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “I blame everyone but me. What I thought what was watching out for me was actually a razor blade wrapped around my wrist. Time wasn't on my side, it didn't have my back when confronted with my pride. Does it lead to the fall” (Brian Braille Winchester). In today’s world we do things without thinking of the people we might hurt, or the consequences that our decisions might lead to. After reading Into the Wild, I think that Christopher McCandless was Inconsiderate.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chris McCandless

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think McCandless died in a senseless way because he didn’t have any idea that he would die in the Denali National Park. He thought he was well prepared because he had lived off land for quite some time now in his life and thought he had all the materials needed. He was an intelligent young man and it was always his dream to live off the land in the Denali National Park. He thought he could lie with the few supplies he had, but turns out he couldn’t, and didn’t.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his novel Into the wild , Jon Krakauer uses rhetorical devices to convey that Christopher McCandless was not a suicidal kid. McCandless's quest for the truth in the wild is something that everyone goes through, including the author himself. Krakauer writes to the majority of his audience who believes that McCandless set out on a death wish, leading him to his fate. He uses his own story to prove that Christopher McCandless was not who the audience perceived him to be. Krakauer uses logic and emotions to show that he and McCandless had similar traits. McCandless, like anyone else, was searching for truth.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Mccandless

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    McCandless early year of his life was abusive and unsettling because his father abused him in many ways that only siblings and he can explain. His father also had another family and impacted McCandless. McCandless could express it. Growing up, his family wanted the best for him. His parents believed that they could buy his respect. McCandless thought other. Overall, Chris McCandless’s childhood wasn’t the best. His journey was the highlight of his life until it came to the end. He was poisoned and suffered for many days with an illness of starvation and was barely able to stand up. During his last days, Chris McCandless writes, “‘I HAVE HAD A HAPPY LIFE AND THANK THE LORD. GOODBYE AND MAY GOD BLESS ALL!’” (Krakauer 199). Chris McCandless finally opened eyes to see what he had in front of him because he realized that his family did care for him and that the people he met along the way gave him happiness, but was too much of a fool to realize. Another most obvious reason for Chris McCandless being a fool for him leaving his life. He left his family, money and career behind to go chase his goal to Alaska. It was awfully nice of him to donate his money to charity, but he lost everything he…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Into the Wild Paper

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jon Krakauer 's non-fiction novel Into the Wild explores the mystery surrounding Christopher McCandless and his life before he inevitably ran off into the heart of the Alaskan wilderness in an attempt to discover himself in some manner. In order to tell this story as accurately as possible, Krakauer uses a variety of techniques to give different perspectives to Chris’ life. The most prominent decision Krakauer makes though is in regards to his decision to try include or exclude himself and his views from the text. When telling Chris’ story, Krakauer takes an almost fully unbiased approach, and yet when he does present his biased empathy towards McCandless, he has full knowledge, and makes the reader fully aware. So, whether the reader ends up feeling empathetic towards McCandless or finds him rather selfish in dependent on how much they connect with him through his story. Because Krakaeur is able to portray McCandless’ life with such finesse and accuracy, including his faults, while incorporating his own personal observations and similar life experiences, he ultimately lets the reader make up their own mind in regards to how they should feel toward him.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the Wild

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jon Krakauer’s “Death of an Innocent” appeared in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. Krakauer was curious in the young man’s story that he, himself set out to investigate the haunting truths that led to the death of Christopher McCandless. Krakauer reveals in his 1996 book “Into the Wild” an expansion to his article of the events that occurred. Jon Krakauer aims to convince his readers that McCandless’s story elicits strong, sympathizing reactions. Krakauer used many rhetorical strategies to create appeals to logos, ethos, and pathos in order to develop the ideas found in his novel.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    into the wild

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “S.O.S I NEED YOUR HELP. I AM INJURED, NEAR DEATH, AND TOO WEAK TO HIKE OUT OF HERE. I AM ALL ALONE, THIS IS NO JOKE. IN THE NAME OF GOD, PLEASE REMAIN TO SAVE ME. I AM OUT COLLECTING BERRIES CLOSE BY AND SHALL RETURN THIS EVENING. THANK YOU, CHRIS MCCANDLESS. AUGUST?” The novel Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is about a young man named Chris McCandless. This individual, right after college had left in the pursuit of adventure and into the wilderness. He left without telling anyone, family and friends alike of his whereabouts and with small portions and little provisions. For this particular reason, some see McCandless as a misguided wacko who caused his own demise, while on the other hand some see him as noble, just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Chris McCandless is indeed noble! He possessed courage and ideals which I admired. He was noble for his self-reliance, being intellectual, and that he was not materialistic.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation…” (Krakauer 56). Throughout Jon Krakauer’s book, Into the Wild, Chris McCandless sees this as a truth so many are unwilling to face. However he refuses to be one of those people who are, “conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservation” (Krakauer 57) regardless of his own highly comfortable upbringing. Throughout the book, Krakauer develops his thesis that Chris is not just another Bear Grylls wanna-be. In this respect the author is correct. He isn’t just someone who read a book or article and decided to run to the Alaska wilderness. “He wasn’t incompetent—he wouldn’t have lasted 113 days if he were.”(Krakauer 85).…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle the Greek philosopher, believed that a tragic hero had four characteristics. His first belief of a tragic hero is nobility or wisdom by birth. The second is hamartia also known as a flaw or mistake flaw of character. His third belief is, a reversal of fortune peripetia brought because of the hero’s hamartia. A tragic hero’s final characteristic is anagnorsis the discovery or recognition that the reversal was brought by the hero’s own actions, and the flaw is recognized to late to save the hero from his fall. A similar hero is a sacrificial hero. A sacrificial hero is a person who gives everything up for the greater good. The novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, is about a young man, Christopher Johnson McCandless who leave society to live in the wilderness. Chris is the perfect example of what a tragic hero should be because he had everything in the world but gives it up to live in the wilderness because he did not agree with society’s beliefs.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays