Preview

Chapter Four: The Exclusionary Rule

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter Four: The Exclusionary Rule
Chapter Four – The
Exclusionary Rule
Vicente Farias
Jose Martinez

The Exclusionary Rule
 The Exclusionary Rule
– Evidence obtained in violation of Fourth
Amendment cannot be used at trial
– The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct
– What other purpose does the exclusionary rule have? The Exclusionary Rule
 In Mapp v Ohio (1961), the Court stated

that any evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment could not be admitted into any court, state or federal.

The Exclusionary Rule
 Determining What is Inadmissible
– Illegally Seized Evidence





Contraband
Fruits of the crime
Instruments of the crime
“Mere Evidence”

The Exclusionary Rule
 Determining What is Inadmissible
– Fruit of the Poisonous

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “if you don’t know what to say to help someone in need. Sometimes, it can be just enough to take the time to listen and provide a supporting shoulder to lean on.” Said by David Cunliffe. Based on the Jib Fowles’ “advertisings fifteen basic appeals “each one of these appeals has an effective meaning in this world. Based on these fifteen appeals I have chosen the fourth appeal which is “the need for guidance”. This appeal has an amazing meaning in the context of the world we live in, but each one of us have a different explanation and meaning to it. In My opinion the meaning of this appeal is to help people understand themselves in terms of personal ability, interest, motivation and potential. The need for guidance is to be protected, shielded, guided. many people need for be guided and supported by others.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A court’s decision in the Katrina case would most likely turn on an assessment of the uncertainty of the flood-exclusion clauses in the insurance policies at issue. This assessment Might rely on extensive some piece on the meaning of the term “flood. It could be said in the plaintiffs’ favor that the flood-exclusion clauses were uncertain because the term “flood” was subject to two reasonable definitions:…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unifying justification for these duties. I challenge the first part of the ruleconsequentialist argument and show that Rossian duties match our moral convictions…

    • 5192 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the aftermath of the brutal murder of his father, a mysterious woman, Kahlan Amnell, appears in the forest seeking Richard Cypher’s help. His world and beliefs are shattered when ancient debts come due with violence. In their darkest hour, hunted relentlessly, tormented by treachery and loss, Kahlan calls upon Richard to reach beyond his sword. Neither of them know that the rules of this battle have just changed or that their time has run out.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am arguing the Defence and I’m seeking the verdict of not guilty. The Defence of Necessity clearly states three points. The first one being that there must be an urgent situation of clear and imminent peril. The second one being that the accused must have had no reasonable legal alternative to breaking the law. The last one states that the harm inflicted by the accused must be proportional to the harm avoided by the accused. Tom Dudley, Richard Parker, Edmund Brooks and Edwin Stephens had managed to escape the wreck by setting sail on a wooden boat that was constructed poorly and was not equipped with the basic necessities to survive. After being stranded in the middle of the shark infested Atlantic ocean,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eligibilty Rules

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Homeless Veterans |None required. |Varies based on type of military |Income support, permanent |Individuals |…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Affirmative defenses are used to clarify or justify the conduct that is suspected to be of unlawful nature .This type of guard at times is harder to prove than those of a negating type. The affirmative defense possibly can end up with a conviction or a decrease in a defendant’s charges which raises a red flag of a defendant’s psychological status at the time of a crime (Hall, 2015). A good answer will explain that a defendant raises an affirmative defense in the latter portion of his or her answer. The first part of the answer is dedicated to responding to each and every one of the allegations raised in the complaint. After that, the defendant is free to raise affirmative defenses.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Previous to the Act coming into force on the 1st January 1986, the exclusion of evidence obtained improperly was rare in application by the courts. Crompton J in R v Leatham [1861] opined that ‘it matters not how you get it, if you steal it even, it would be admissible in evidence’, and in the case of Kuruma v R [1955], Lord Goddard CJ gave the view that the courts would exclude evidence obtained if it operated unfairly against the accused.3 More recently in the case of R v Sang [1980] Lord Diplock reaffirmed his predecessors’ conclusions by offering that apart from the exception of R v Payne [1963]:…

    • 2201 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Bending the Rules

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “But Sir, you always remind us of the strict implementation of the rules and regulations,” the young lady protested. “I didn’t let them in because they didn’t show me the document stipulated in the guidelines.”…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    GAAR refers to General Anti-Avoidance Rules. These rules target any transaction or business arrangement that is…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    → States that two contrary propositions cannot be both true but they may be both false at the same time.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rule of Dearle v Hall further provides that a notice must be given to a debtor, trustee or any other holder of the fund according to the circumstances of the fund. Therefore the performance to the legal or equitable obligation that has been subjected to the assignment lies with the person who receives the notice as the assignor and the person who gives the notice as the assignee. In the circumstances where there are more than one trustees, a notice to one of them becomes effective whether such trustee notifies the other trustees or not. The rule also applies even when circumstantially the trustee who receives the initial notice ceases the capacity as a trustee through death or retirement without having communicated to the co-trustees the…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fabiani Law Case

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Antoine Fabiani case is an international case which involved the Government of Venezuela and the government of France where the two governments agreed to get an arbitrator to put to rest on the case of M. Antonio Fabiani in the most just manner and without bias. This shows that law has no barriers and no matter how powerful in terms of government or inferior, in this case Fabiani, the law will always be just provided the best means are pursued. In this case both the Venezuelan and French governments had to sought for external help to avoid bias incase the case to be ruled in either of their judicial systems. This is a true example that law in this case international law is necessary and crucial to our society world wide and that there is no excuse to not be just since the power of law and true justice has no boundaries.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mischief Rule

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Mischief Rule is a rule of construction that judges can apply in statutory interpretation in order to discover Parliament's intention. In applying the rule, the court is essentially asking the question: what was the "mischief" that the previous law did not cover, which Parliament was seeking to remedy when it passed the law now being reviewed by the court?…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The above rule of equality is however not an absolute rule and there are number exception to it…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays