Preview

Case Study #1: the Air Force Brake

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study #1: the Air Force Brake
In my opinion, Mr. Vandivier would be morally responsible for any "accidents" that resulted when pilots tested the brake. I believe that because he knew of the serious problems that could result in this product being released to the Air Force. When Mr. Lawson approached Mr. Vandivier with the issue in the very beginning, it was Mr. Vandivier’s choice to tell the Goodrich members of the error that he had made in creating the brakes. It was also Goodrich’s responsibility to not take part in shutting down the experiment when they knew that it was 100 pounds per square inch over what the breaks were originally supposed to be tested at. I believe that all people that knew about the issue should be held responsible for the accident. I believe that the biggest weight should weight on Mr. Vandivier though. He was the one that made the ultimate decision as to whether to do the paperwork or not. Mr. Lawson, is also at major fault, however, without Mr. Vandivier he could not have completed the report needed to finalize the product. When Mr. Vandivier first questioned himself, he should have stopped and not done it. I believe that having the weight of possible being the reason for a death is more important than any job, no matter what the pay is. It says that Mr. Vandivier was well known for his engineering skills so finding another job, should not have been as hard of a decision.
Velasquez, M. (2012). Business ethics: Concepts and cases (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eventually, fear of legal liability forces them to expose the deviance. In the case, “Why Should My Conscience Bother Me?,” B.F. Goodrich Co., created a faulty aircraft break. The people within the company knew that the break would fail if it was used, but they continued to forge tests…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stokely is responsible for injuring the motorcyclist while driving a vehicle from AAA Auto Dealers. Employers are vicariously liable under the respondeat superior doctrine. In the respondeat superior doctrine, in most cases, an employer is responsible for the actions of employees performed within the scope of employment. John Stokely used the company’s vehicle for personal reasons, regardless of what they were, and negligently collided into and injured someone on a motorcycle. John Stokely is a sales executive for AAA Auto Dealers. Not only did he use the company’s car for personal reasons, his boss accompanied him on the visit to a family member’s house for dinner. The boss was excusing John Stokely’s behavior, allowing him to use company property for a different purpose other than what it was intended for. John Stokely’s boss accompanied him to his cousin’s house so it can be argued that John Stokely had “permission” to do what he wanted. The boss will be held responsible by the owner(s) of AAA Auto Dealers as well by allowing John Stokely to act outside of his job description.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hahnousek Case Summary

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The backhoe operator can not be charged with a crime in this case even though his mistake is what lead to the accident occurring. Because the Hanousek was the supervisor and “could have prevented” the accident from occurring the law lays the responsibility solely on him. The backhoe operator would basically be unable to be convicted because most corporations have clauses in place to shield employees and leaving all the responsibility on their superiors.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Absolutely not. Individual managers should not be held responsible for the unethical behavior of other people in the organization. After all, Solomon did not personally do anything wrong. I disagree that individual managers should not be held responsible for the unethical behavior of other people in the organization. The reason I disagree with this is Solomon was the CEO and President of Forest Laboratories Inc. in addition to being the chairman of the company. For him not to know what is going on in a company in which he holds so much power is irresponsible and does not make much sense. He was key in getting Celexa started at Forest due to the inspiration of his son’s bouts of depression. I do not know for certain that he was not aware of the fact that they were marketing the use of Celexa in pediatrics and the kickbacks they gave Pediatricians who prescribed Celexa.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Please be advised, the Kuwait housing rental rates paid by Northrop Grumman have been reviewed. Northrop pays substantially less for a 2-bedroom apartment, in the same area all inclusive, for a 6-month lease. The COLSA rate, being on a 1-year lease, should be less than what Northrop Grumman pays. Instead, it is $1000.00 higher.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In tort law this is a groundbreaking case in our nations history. It helped launch an idea of proximate case. This new meaning would consider that a defendant is only liable the harm if it is reasonably foreseeable. Proximate cause is now has a boundary on the range of tort liability. I believe that the majority opinion is stronger because of their argument for proximate cause. If the box did not have explosives in it the accident would not have occurred so there was no way the workers could have foreseen the explosion because they thought it was a normal…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Rutledge

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3.) Could the backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline also be charged with a crime in this situation? Explain The backhoe operator can not be charged with a crime in this case even though his mistake is what lead to the accident occurring. Because the Hanousek was the supervisor and “could have prevented” the accident from occurring the law lays the responsibility solely on him.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Goodrich case, the engineers should have paid more attention on building brakes that would have been compatible with military requirements rather than adjusting data and manipulating testing procedures to meet the requirements. Additionally, the decisions were mostly taken by the hierarchical authority like Warren and Line despite Lawson’s resistance. Others like manager Van Horn were silent as they followed ‘don’t know- won’t hurt’ philosophy (p.63). This example supports argument made by Winner that the interpretation of social and political order (authority) varies and applies differently in distinct circumstances (p.39). In this case, a democratic power structure could have worked better in order to take decision to change the brake…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Davis’ first argument to defend the lethal decision of Lund is that Lund was not trained to think like a manager. His background was in engineering. He then goes on the state that Engineers are typically…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He is not held accountable for the lost money. When Nagel 's outlook on responsibility is applied to assess this situation, we see that there was a better decision that could have been made. If the teller had the objective knowledge about the button under the desk that the manager had, he could have prevented the robber from stealing the bank 's money. However, if he only had this objectivity and not his subjectivity, he would not be in the position to produce the volition at all. The teller did not, in this case, choose the best decision, but at the same time is not fully responsible for the loss of the bank 's money. The teller is partly held accountable for the lost money because there was an alternative choice that would have made the overall outcome better off. Unfortunately for the teller, the knowledge of the hidden button was not made aware to him. This is why the teller is only partly responsible. Ginet asserts that responsibility is to be judged by the specific event while Nagel implies that there are different degrees of responsibility that vary with the amount of information that the agent has.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Murata , Junichi. "From Challenger to Columbia: What lessons can we learn from the report of the Columbia accident investigation board for engineering ethics?." Virginia Tech: Digital Library and Archives.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class Action: Tort Tale

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film Class Action is a piece that does not directly involve a tort tale, however the case portrayed in the movie could easily depicted as one. In order to convert this case into a tort tale, we have to have a brief overview of the events that occurred in the movie. To start, the defense attorney (Maggie Ward) for Argo was the daughter of the attorney who was representing the clients who were suing Argo (Jed Ward). According to the movie, a certain model and year of an Argo (Fictional car company) automobile would catch fire, if the metaphorical “stars aligned”. Finally, the defense attorney ended up helping her father win the case against Argo, proving that she was more interested helping the victims and bring about justice , rather than…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Manslaughter

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to 2007, successive Governments faced continual criticism that the common law offence of gross negligence manslaughter was inadequate to deal with serious tragedies (for example the Zeebrugge ferry disaster and King’s Cross fire), including those occurring in the workplace. In fact all attempts to prosecute large companies under the old law were unsuccessful.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper I plan to evaluate the scenario concerning Bobby, ACE Sports, the Nurse, the Surgeon and City General Hospital. I plan on explaining why each party should be found negligent, what type of negligence they should be charged with and how the Emergency Medical Treatment &Labor Act (EMTALA) could have prevented the loss of Bobby’s hands.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: Matt Theurer was an 18 year old adult that worked at McDonald’s part time. His friends and family worried about him because he had many extra-curricular activities, worked for the National Guard, and worked for McDonalds. McDonald’s informal policy did not allow high school students to work more than one midnight shift per week or split shifts. There was a special clean-up week McDonald’s held, Theurer worked five nights. One night he worked until midnight, another until 11:30pm, two nights until 9pm, and another until 11pm. On Monday, April 4th, 1988, Theurer worked from 3:30 until 7:30pm, followed by the clean up shift beginning at midnight until 5am on April 5th, and then he worked another shift from 5am until 8:21am. During that shift, Theurer told his manager he was tired and asked to leave from his next regular shift. The manager accepted his request, and Theurer began to drive home. He was driving 45 miles per hour on a two lane road when he either fell asleep or became drowsy. Theurer crossed the dividing lane into on-coming traffic, and crashed into Frederic Faverty’s minivan. Theurer was killed and Faverty was seriously injured. Faverty settled his claims with Theurer’s estate, and then he filed suit against McDonald’s.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays