Preview

Why Should My Conscience Bother Me

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should My Conscience Bother Me
Whistleblowers: A whistleblower is a person within a company who speaks out about any organizational deviance that is occurring. There are three main types of whistle blowers, which are, unbending resisters, implicated protesters, and reluctant collaborators. Implicated Protesters speak out within organization than comply with the deviance. They choose to go along with their superiors, because they may have believed that resisting would be worse for them than complying. Eventually, fear of legal liability forces them to expose the deviance. In the case, “Why Should My Conscience Bother Me?,” B.F. Goodrich Co., created a faulty aircraft break. The people within the company knew that the break would fail if it was used, but they continued to forge tests …show more content…
The whole company was well-aware that the breaks were hazardous. Kermit Vandivier was hired by Goodrich to issue a formal qualification report, which was an accumulation of data and test results to prove the break had met all military requirements. In the beginning, Vandivier became known of the faulty break and mentioned it to multiple superiors. When he found out that everyone was told to report the false data, he eventually decided to look the other way and cooperate. Eventually, Vandivier decided to blow the whistle on the Goodrich deviance and reported to the FBI. Because of Vandivier’s actions, the military became aware of the faulty break and demanded to see raw tests and B.F. Goodrich was forced to get rid of the faulty break. Vandivier handed in his resignation after blowing the whistle on the corporate deviance. At first he may have gone along with the deviance because he was too afraid of not having a job or being able to support his family, but the fear of illegal liability forced him to come forward

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational factors or ‘bad barrels’ are said to have instigated many occurrences of corporate corruption and deviant behaviour (Wharton 2002, p 2), involving large numbers of active or passive participants; these are ‘rarely the result of a few bad apples’ (Murphy 2007, p 7). The AWB case is a clear example of corporate culture and other systemic failures influencing and defining an organisation’s decision making and its ethical posture.…

    • 5663 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Goodrich case, the engineers should have paid more attention on building brakes that would have been compatible with military requirements rather than adjusting data and manipulating testing procedures to meet the requirements. Additionally, the decisions were mostly taken by the hierarchical authority like Warren and Line despite Lawson’s resistance. Others like manager Van Horn were silent as they followed ‘don’t know- won’t hurt’ philosophy (p.63). This example supports argument made by Winner that the interpretation of social and political order (authority) varies and applies differently in distinct circumstances (p.39). In this case, a democratic power structure could have worked better in order to take decision to change the brake…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doing what’s right is never an easy decision one when it comes to work. However, when it comes to whistleblowing, this may be the hardest choice that someone will ever have to make in their life. Handling a whistleblower claim means dealing with the possibility that repercussions may come in the terms of unemployment, drop of income, loss of friendships, and reputation. The choice of a whistleblower can be impossible to make, in terms, of how they are going to bring to higher authorities.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey (2015), whistleblowers are people who decide to report unethical or illegal activities, usually activities under the control of their employers. They may be working for private companies, nonprofit organizations, or for the government. A whistleblower is an individual working in an organization who decides to expose the misconduct, misbehavior, or illegal actions occurring in that organization. Making the decision to expose these actions can be very difficult to disclose with the fear of repercussion. The information being disclosed to supervisors or the media can either be inside or outside their organization. There are a number of organization or groups out there that are concerned with issues in organization and when a whistleblower is exposing corruption, those groups make themselves available for the whistleblower to make their allegations.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enron Argument

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities. However, Sharron Watkins only blew the whistle internally and so did not do everything she was morally required do as Vice President of Corporate Development for Enron.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paradox Of Missing Harm

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The three paradoxes that Davis claims the standard theory give rise to are the paradox of burden, the paradox of missing harm, and the paradox of failure. According to Davis, the paradox of burden perceives the whistle-blower as a good Samaritans because they take on substantial risk in their career, financial securities, and personal relation. The standard theory does not provide sufficient condition to justify such risk. Second, the paradox of missing harm argues that the whistleblower is reported damage after the fact, and they often act in the condition that they can prevent harm. Finally, the paradox of failure indicates that the whistleblowers have little success in preventing damage.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conscience is the inner conviction that something is right or wrong. In a religious discussion, it may be thought of as the ‘voice of God’, speaking within the individual, and even as a direct revelation from God. John Newman defines the conscience as “the voice of God”, a principle planted within us, before we have had any training, although training and experience are necessary for its strength, growth, and due formation that is an “internal witness for both the existence and the law of God”. Newman shows how the light of conscience, active in every human heart, finds fulfillment not in subjectivity and in the communion of the Catholic Church. Newman’s view was that it is often said that second thoughts are best. So they are in matters of judgment but not in matters of conscience.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For many of use our consciences have always been a part of us since the day we first started to recognise ourselves. It would be easy for everyone to follow this ‘voice of reason’ in our head as the outcome if often a positive one. However there are cases in which it could be deemed in the best interest of the person to disobey the conscience as it could led to a very immoral action. It is in these cases that not always obeying the conscience would be seemed as the right action.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1967 the B.F. Goodrich Co. made a bid to produce four disk brakes for the LTV Aerospace Co. However, in order to receive the bid Goodrich had to submit an obscenely low figure (doing the job at a near loss). This was because nearly ten years earlier Goodrich had supplied faulty brakes to LTV and consequently had lost them as a customer. By providing a cheap, light-weight four disk brake for the airplane Goodrich hoped to win over LTV and regain their trust. While attempting to atone for their past mistake is an example of good business ethics, they did hope to profit from the venture. Although the initial job would be done with Goodrich losing money the upkeep of the airplanes would mean future business for replacement parts and it would allow Goodrich to have the inside track on all other future LTV projects, which would benefit the company greatly. The design for the brake was the brainchild of John Warren one of Goodrich's top engineers. However, upon initial test it was found that the brakes surface area was too small to stop a plane of that size safely. What resulted was the break heating up to over 1000 degrees and fusing together into one solid mass. Needless to say the brake was a total failure, and potentially dangerous for any pilot that would attempt to use them upon landing an aircraft. However, failure was not a reasonable option among the higher-ups of the company because assurances had been made that the brakes would work, and would be delivered on time. The events that transpired were free of any form of business ethics. From the top down test results were falsified and everyone involved was faced with the question, "Do I lie like they are asking me to, or do I want to find a new job?" Several people in this…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All stories caused by a contract issued on June, 18, 1967, by LTV Aerospace Corporation with Goodrich Company to order wheels and brakes for the new Air Force plane. For Goodrich, it seemed destined…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    on whistle blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. (2011). Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 485-496. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0876-z.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When engineers design a product many things go in to the decision making process when it comes to selecting materials, design, and the manufacturing processes. One concern that has always been in the decision making process is trying to make sure the outcome will always be ethically good, although this isn’t always the case. Try as they might, no person is perfect, and accidents do happen. When engineering disasters happen there are many factors that may be involved, such as human factors, design flaws, extreme conditions, and materials failures. When these things do happen it is important to look at the ethical aspect of each part of the failure and try to analyze if any one person could be put at fault.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conscience is a moral sense of right and wrong, especially felt by a person which will affect their behaviour due to an inner feeling of the ‘correct’ approach to take in a given situation. The majority of people tend to agree with the belief that there is such thing as conscience. In this essay I will be assessing whether the conscience should always be obeyed. Philosophers have made theories giving reasons why we should or should not always follow our conscience. They are divided into groups, religious and secular. Religious philosophers are Aquinas, Butler and Newman. Fromm, Freud and Piaget take on a secular approach.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays