Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Capital punishment

Good Essays
817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital punishment
The Death Penalty Should Be Outlawed

As human being, we are born and living together in one earth, and one world. Because of that, we need to love or to be loved, to care or to be cared to each other. Even though there are both pro and cons, the death penalty is always an argumentative topic in the society, which comes along with a lot of unsolvable issues. In my opinion, I strongly think that the capital punishment should be banned in this society. To explain for this opinion, there are three points that are Death Penalty is not humane; it might be an irrevocable mistake; and the last reason is the expensive cost for Capital Punishment that the Government has to afford. Certainly, Capital Punishment is a cruel action to human by applying many execution methods such as Lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, firing squad,... The main purpose of those horrible ways consider as murder; putting them in painful death that seems not a right thing to do in morality. For example, try to imagine and you are as a criminal in this kind of situation, you surely do not want to die in such a pain like that. Moreover, the family members of the executed needlessly suffer too. To die in front of them will even be more painful which nobody wants to watch this miserable sight. Instead of suffering those terrible things, the criminal want to have a second chance to fix your mistakes, and to start his or her life all over again to become a better person in the future.
The quote “ When you forgive, you in no way change the past, but you sure do change the future” by Bernard Meltzer, implies that we live for tomorrow world, not for the past, thus, there is nothing bad about forgiving people and giving them a second chance to live honestly.

Secondly, what if death penalty which is granted for the criminal, is right and fair punishment or if the criminal is guiltless? In the end, what does the court who judges wrong offset for the victim after finding out what he or she did was irrevocable mistakes.
According to the source by Russ Feingold, from US Senator (D-WI) introducing the “National Death Penalty Moratorium Act of 2000”, April 26, 2000, “...Since the reinstatement of the modern Death Penalty, eighty seven people have been freed from death row because they were later proven innocent. That is a demonstrated error rate of one innocent person for every seven persons executed. When the consequences are life and death, we need to demand the same standard for our system of justice as we would for our airlines... It is a central pillar of our criminal justice system that is better that many guilty people go free than that one innocent should suffer... Let us reflect to ensure that we are bring just. Let us pause to be certain we do not kill a single innocent person. This is really not too much to ask for a civilized society.” In reality, time continuously passes by very fast, and every one is getting old in the same time. Thus, the people who have to suffer the Death Penalty will not be able to enjoy their youths again because their lives are already taken away by the Judge. Indeed, there is no justification for an innocent person dying. One innocent death is one too many and is not outweighed by the "benefits" of the death penalty. Third, the comparison between the Capital Punishment and the life in Jail is also an issue for the current economy in general. To compare, the total cost for a death penalty trial, subsequent time on death row and execution is much higher than the cost of just sentencing a person to live in prison. For more details, the government need to run more pre-trail time, more experts, twice as many attorneys, and other expenses. After all, the result will not help to change any thing from the past. Otherwise, the government should make the prisoner to spend the rest of their lives paying for their evils because put them to death is not even enough for their mistakes. Also, it is an effective way in participating in changing the world to become “no-crime”. Finally, my opinion is the Capital Punishment should be outlawed in the society. There are so many different and effective ways to make the criminal repay for what they did. To punish them to death is not humane, and very cruel to themselves, and their family too. In the mean time, the message I want to send to all the readers is because no body perfect, everyone makes mistakes, please give the criminal a second chance to restart their lives honestly over again.

Cite sources: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/forgive.html http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment or death penalty is usually imposed on persons who committed heinous crimes and are those that endanger the safety of the society. Some countries and societies implement capital punishment while others do not. There are various reasons for this policy of countries, including the social view on the death penalty and the prevailing religious view in the society among others.…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the death penalty affects both the individual and society at large, decisions imposing such punishments should take all factors into consideration. Some people say that, the possibility that innocent men and women may be put to death. “While there are many reasons to turn off the machinery of death, perhaps the most compelling is the ever-present possibility of executing innocent people.” (Thomson, 2006). In fact sometimes the court can pass the wrong judgment to the wrong person. In the case of a death penalty judgment, there is no going back once the sentence has been stated.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many positions can be defended when debating the issue of capital punishment. In Jonathan Glover's essay "Executions," he maintains that there are three views that a person may have in regard to capital punishment: the retributivist, the absolutist, and the utilitarian. Although Glover recognizes that both statistical and intuitive evidence cannot validate the benefits of capital punishment, he can be considered a utilitarian because he believes that social usefulness is the only way to justify it. Martin Perlmutter on the other hand, maintains the retributivist view of capital punishment, which states that a murderer deserves to be punished because of a conscious decision to break the law with knowledge of the consequences. He even goes as far to claim that just as a winner of a contest has a right to a prize, a murderer has a right to be executed. Despite the fact that retributivism is not a position that I maintain, I agree with Perlmutter in his claim that social utility cannot be used to settle the debate about capital punishment. At the same time, I do not believe that retributivism justifies the death penalty either.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment in the United States judicial system is hypocritical, morally wrong and unjust. Capital punishment should be eliminated for many reasons. It is hypocritical, it puts innocent lives at risk and millions of U.S. dollars are being spent to end people's lives.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital punishment

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Murder is wrong. Since childhood we have been taught this indisputable truth. Ask yourself, then, what is capital punishment? In its simplest form, capital punishment is defined as one person taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is the definition of murder. There are 36 states with the death penalty, and they must change. These states need to abolish it on the grounds that it carries a dangerous risk of punishing the innocent, is unethical and barbaric, and is an ineffective deterrent of crime versus the alternative of life in prison without parole.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why some people think that death penalty is unfair and unacceptable. Many people believe that death penalty is not enough punishment for a criminal that has taken someone’s life. Some feel that the death penalty is the easiest way out for criminals, it is considered a lesser punishment than others who was sentenced for life and it is lesser suffering. It offers the tragic illusion that we can defend life by taking life. The death penalty was inflicted on the culprits indulged in practice of a different religion, premarital sex, homosexual behavior, prostitutes, rebellious teenagers, and blasphemy. Capital Punishment is itself a premeditated murder. This is unacceptable even it is inflicted by state authority as it lowers the value of life. Everyone thinks human life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tommy Douglas’ “Capital Punishment” focuses on the negatives aspects of the death sentence in Canada. “I am in favour of the motion to abolish capital punishment and I am also supporting the amendment to put it on a five-year trial basis” (Tommy Douglas 558). Being a person who lives abroad in the public with millions of others, I must say I disagree with Douglas’ argument as to abolishing the punishment, as I feel having capital punishment would indefinitely reduce the murder rate in our country as well as deter criminals from even having slightest thought of committing a murder in the first place. Also, the notwithstanding clause (Section 33) in our legal system which states the government can override a number of our personal freedoms is an obvious bump in our legal system; which apparently has abolished capital punishment although the system still seems to have enough power to have someone sentenced to death even if it is indirect.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 9178 Words
    • 37 Pages

    Capital Punishment - Capital Punishment Many distinctive doctrines in criminal law originated in efforts to restrict the number of capital crimes and executions. For instance, in the late 18th century, when all murder in the United States was punishable by death, Pennsylvania pioneered in dividing murder into two categories. The state enacted laws that authorized punishment of first-degree murder by death, while second-degree murder was punishable by imprisonment only. Elsewhere, penal codes uniformly required death for certain serious crimes.... [tags: Capital Punishment] 1715 words…

    • 9178 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Study on Capital Punishment

    • 28736 Words
    • 115 Pages

    According to oxford Dictionary, Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.[1][1] Capital punishment is the death sentence awarded for capital offences like crimes involving planned murder, multiple murders, repeated crimes; rape and murder etc where in the criminal provisions consider such persons as a gross danger to the existence of the society and provide death punishment.[2][2] Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime.…

    • 28736 Words
    • 115 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty also known as the Capital punishment has been argued that it is merely to fulfill a desire for revenge. Also many people often questioned whether it's fair or not to continue with the death penalty. Whether or not the punishment is legal, it depends upon whether or not the punishment serves a valid point or purpose of a policy.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The modern world claims to be civilized and yet, the most heinous and barbarous activities are a common part of this modern and civilized society. The law regulates the conduct of the society and hence even in such times as ours we still have certain barbaric laws to meet rare circumstances where human behavior can reach such levels so as to be termed as being diabolical and grotesque. Death Penalty is one such penal provision in law. And due to existence of such rare human behavior, it has been quite easy for the Supreme Court to uphold the validity of the Capital…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A lot of countries in the world have abolished capital punishment because of reasons concerning humanity, some places are still using the old practice of capital punishment. Is it okay to keep capital punishment, or should it be erased altogether? Many people often get the sentence for committing serious crimes such as crimes like murder and drug trafficking. Leaving you to think should this kind of sentence be taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Execution of criminals and political opponents has been used by nearly all societies—both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. In most places that practise capital punishment it is reserved for murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In some countries sexual crimes, such as rape, adultery, incest and sodomy, carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as apostasy in Islamic nations (the formal renunciation of the state religion). In many countries that use the death penalty, drug trafficking is also a capital offence. In China, human trafficking and serious cases of corruption are punished by the death penalty. In militaries around the world courts-martial have imposed death sentences for offences such as cowardice, desertion, insubordination, and mutiny.[16]…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a well-known quotation widely used in Mahatma Gandhi‘s policy of non-violence which states: “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind”. If we respond to every single injury, in our society there would be no need for laws and we could all be primitive again. To put one to death in the electic chair to show that murder is wrong is contradiction in policy that confuses criminals and undermines any criminal deterence capital punishment was intended to have. The most recent FBI data clearly demonstrates that countries with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without. Moreover, study after study has found that the capital punishment is much more expensive than live in prison as the process of it is far more complex than for any kind of crime.The largest costs come at trial stages when it is decided whether or not sentence defendant to death. This shows that countries do not need this extreme threat to prevent crime.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays