Preview

Campaign Finance Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Campaign Finance Research Paper
The Need for Campaign Finance Money is such a devilish thing. Money can be a very helpful tool to improve one’s life but in certain hands, can limit the right and beliefs of others. This idea is quite evident in the American political arena. Campaigns for various offices are at the mercy of money. A candidate’s chance at being elected to office typically hinges on his or her ability to be noticed through ads, billboards, tv time, social media or any other similar method. Most of these methods require large amounts of money in order to be effective. As this fact becomes more and more evident with each passing campaign, even larger amounts of cash are injected into future campaigns. Campaign finance reform is needed not only due to larger amounts of cash coming into play. Rather campaign finance reform is needed because current laws are not consistent with public preference, current campaign finance practices create dangerous possibilities, and if left unreformed, current finance practices will continue to impede the rights and beliefs of citizens and diminish the strength of American democracy. The simplest argument that can be made for campaign finance reform is the fact that current law is inconsistent with public opinion. Most laws draw some form of ire from one side or another. However, it is rare when both sides agree …show more content…
This is evident from their apathy, their disagreement with current law, and their outcry against outdated laws. Further lack of reform would could cause dangerous political environments in the U.S. Current financial structure allows for a lack of transparency, which could lead to foreign influence, and apathy among U.S voters. Finally, the greatest danger lies at home by placing most of the influence in the hands of a few. These hand can pose a threat to the rights of other citizens and restrict their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This summer, I was fortunate enough to get an internship on a local U.S. Congress campaign. I live in the Pennsylvania 8th district and worked on the campaign of Kathy Boockvar, Democratic challenger to Republican incumbent Mike Fitzpatrick. I was able to meet many interesting people and clarify my own political ideals, but most importantly I got to learn about campaigns and the election process.…

    • 3864 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, in 1979, Congress further weakened the law by allowing parties to use ‘soft money’ which is the ‘one time’ funding from governments and organisations for a project or special purpose such as voter registration, or party building activities. Later, this money was used for candidate related issue ads which led to the increase in soft money and expenditures in elections. This led to the creation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act which banned soft money expenses by parties.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though there is a lot of Americans today that think that money has no business in politics there is pros to it. First of all the current federal contribution limits have not been adjusted for inflation in more than 20 years! That means the maximum individual contribution was set as 1,000 in 1974 which meant that the 1,000 in 1974 was only worth 300 in 1996. Candidates have to raise 3 times the amount of money today than they would have 22 years ago to reach the same result and be able to have a competitive campaign.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citizens United v. FEC allowed for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wanted in order to convince the public either to vote for or against a candidate. They are protected by the First Amendment, which allows for them to have unlimited spending. However, the Supreme Court argued that it is illegal for corporations or labor unions to give money directly to candidate. The Supreme Court argued that if corporations or labor unions give money directly to a candidate, it could lead to corruption. Ultimately, I agree with the Supreme Court decision that it is illegal for them to do this and agree that they can persuade the public through other methods. For instance, corporations and labor unions can persuade the public through ads…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When things don’t work the way they should, people start to worry. They know that they need something to change. This is what Fiorina explains in chapter The Rise of The Washington Establishment about voting. The main focus of this chapter is the issues of self interest related to government and its congressmen, bureaucrats, and voters.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, I believe there should be severe limits as to how leftover campaign finances are to be used based on the following: (1) to prevent fraudulent acts by deceitful politicians. (2) To build and maintain high ethical standard within the political realm and the politicians. (3) To gain trust of the public.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Lobbyism

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today there is a limit on the size of gifts to members of Congress from lobbyist. This limit proposes that any gift that is less than fifty dollars in value can be given to Congress members and staff by lobbyist. In addition, each year a lobbyist cannot give more than one hundred dollars in gifts to both Congress members and staff. These guidelines were put into place to prevent conflict and controversy. Specifically, these regulations were made to prevent laws from coming into place and policy changes because of lobbyist offering and persuading Congress members and staffers through very expensive gifts. The book states that, “Interest groups lobbying often involves cases where resources favor one side.” Therefore, if lobbyist do have a good amount of money, they would have an advantage because they could provide a large amount of gifts. This may cause the Congress members to become more willing to make policy changes because of the continuous attention and gifts they are provided by the lobbyist. The government wanted to establish these guidelines to prevent this from occurring all together because it is not right. Due to this, countless reform proposals worked to prevent lobbyist from providing a member of Congress with anything.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The faction that aligns the closest to my views is the Libertarian party. Libertarians are considered to be neither liberal nor conservative. Most Libertarians want to do away with the two party system. I believe this faction is the purest form of government. That being said, there are a couple things I do not agree with. For example, most libertarians believe that abortions should be illegal and want to reduce military spending. Overall, I agree with this party’s point of view the…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today the United States uses a process called single member representation. This has been the process the United States has been using since the United States was first established. This had been very effective until now. The reality is that this is greatly underrepresentation of the smaller parties. Proportional Representation is a better system in a number of ways; there would be less issues with gerrymandering, there would be a rise in the number of voters, there would be much better representation, and there would be more sexual equality in Congress.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Congress Pros And Cons

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Going back to 1883, The Pendleton Act, created a civil service system to help control where money was coming from. This was believed to give corporations preference because politicians would raise money by speaking to corporations and offering to put a stop to bills that would negatively affect them and promote laws that would be in the corporation’s favor. In 1907 Teddy Roosevelt signed into law the Tillman Act because he believed money was a negative influence on campaigns. This act banned corporations from giving money directly to candidates. The Taft-Harley Act of 1947 expanded on the Tillman Act by adding that unions could not directly contribute to candidates. These acts caused the creation of Political Action Committees, or PACs, which have a large influence on campaigns. In 1971, The Federal Election Commission Act, or FECA, was passed to help control PACs. The Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, or BCRA, tried to limit the influence that PACs had on elections. This act says that PACs cannot run ads within thirty days of an election. Finally, we come to the Citizens United VS Federal Election Commission, FEC. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United and this decision said that people, or PACs, can spend money the…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campaign finance reform is the issue of our lifetime. While we may point to climate change, gun control, economic inequality, the underlying problem is the influence of money in politics. Our representatives are focused on winning elections, instead of addressing constituent concerns. They have to specifically focus on spending the majority of their working time calling donors, and raising money for their campaigns, that this puts their real job on hold. Time spent calling people and asking for donations is estimated to be around ⅓ to ½ of their work day. Just this fact itself proves that the insane influence of money in politics is detrimental to democracy and disallows politicians to focus on what really matters: the voices…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is said that the huge significance of money compromises America’s democracy. This is why spending limits have been introduced. In the aftermath of the crooked Watergate scandal, anxiety over campaign finance led to the passage of two major reform bills—the Revenue Act of 1971 and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974—that…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think democracy is endangered by the need to raise huge amounts of money to run for public office? Is the need for big money leading to less democracy—that is, government by special interests? Would you support public financing of campaigns?…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays