Preview

BUSINESS LAW AND ETHICS

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
341 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUSINESS LAW AND ETHICS
Pearl, Jade & Diamond decided to form a limited company. The company will be involved in the entertainment business providing models and dancers for the industry. In the meantime, they entered into a contract of employment with Tyra. Tyra is to act as their event manager. The terms of the contract states that Tyra will be paid RM10,000 a month and will continue to work with the company once the company has been formed, for a period of three years.
Three months later, a company known as CayoteUgly Bhd (CUB) was formed. CUB’s MOA expressly states that the business of the company is to provide services for fashion and dance shows, promotional campaigns and product launches, talent casting and paperdoll shows. In their first Board of Directors’ (BOD) meeting, CUB decided to issue their shares to the public. In the same meeting, the directors have decided to terminate Tyra’s employment prematurely.
Giselle subscribes 30,000 units of shares of CUB. Six months later, the BOD have decided that the company should venture into new businesses. The businesses that they have in mind are manufacturing and selling beauty products and liquor. For this purposes, CUB entered into a contract to purchase three pieces of land, to be developed into factories, from SlipperyWhenWet Sdn Bhd (SWW). The contract was entered into on the 1st of February 2004. Under the contract, SWW is to transfer the land to CUB on the 21st of March 2005 and CUB is to pay the purchase price (RM900,000) upon completion of the transfer.
On the 1st of January 2005, Giselle found out about the contract between CUB and SWW and she is extremely unhappy with the company’s expansion plan as she is a muslim and doesn’t want to be associated with a company that manufacture and sells liquor.
Based on the above facts, decide:
a. whether Tyra would be successful in her action against CUB for breach of contract; and
b. whether Giselle would be able to restraint the company from carrying on the business of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 45

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c) Provide an analysis of the impact of the requirements for a valid contract in the situation above.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CEO and indicated that she wished to sell the family ownership interest in CML by…

    • 3284 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 9 September Jamal wrote back to Bob stating that he could not sell the…

    • 753 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Savage Beast Case Study

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Corporate decisions – It is important for everyone in upper management to be on the same page and to agree on company decisions. When the founders of a company are not in agreement the entire company suffers. In this case, I think one of them leaving was a good decision.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Chen, a retail seller of fruit, entered into a contract for the purchase of 10 bushels of peaches from Georgina, at a price of $5 per bushel. Delivery was to be in one month. One week after this contract was formed, unexpected cold weather destroyed most of the peach crop and prices doubled. Georgina asked Chen if he would agree to a price increase to $7 per bushel, to help her absorb some of her loss. Chen agreed. However, after the peaches were delivered, Chen refused to pay more than $5 per bushel.…

    • 5636 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law and Ethics

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Answer: Yes. Generally, an agent is himself liable for the consequences of his actions for committing tort or crime when working for the principle. Nevertheless, principal may also be liable for the torts and crimes committed by his agent. Courts generally use two predominant theories to impose liability on principals for the injuries caused by their agents: respondeat superior and direct liability. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the principal is liable if the agent was working within the scope of the agency when the tort occurred. Though this act of agent benefits the principal as well in gaining the business, it is unlikely to be applicable in the case of Carl Brown. In the other hand, under the direct liability, principal is basically liable when it is negligent in the hiring and /or the…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A corporation is a business or organization formed by a group of people, who are known as shareholders, with the sole purpose of making profits. A corporation is its own legal entity, meaning that it has its own juridical personality. It has many of the some rights and obligations that and individual would have, such as the competency to buy and sell property; enter into leases and contracts; and can sue or be sued, essentially, it can be prosecuted and punished if it violates the law. Each of the share holders benefit from limited liability, however, there are some cases in which they can be held personally liable i.e: fraud. The principle advantage of a corporation is that given the fact that is has its patrimony, it allows for the corporation to exist even following the death of the business owners, meaning that the rights are transferable seeing as its juridical personality is separate than that of the shareholders.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chandler, D. (2009). The perfect storm of leaders’ unethical behavior: A conceptual framework. Retrieved from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol5iss1/IJLS_Vol5Is1_Chandler (2).pdf…

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law & Ethics

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consider the possible conflicts between legally doing business and selling fast-food, given the increasing evidence of how it is a significant contributing factor in public health, obesity, and diabetes facing many Americans. Now, based on what you've learned in this module, answer the following:…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This paper will compare the Franciscan Values with Kohlberg’s Levels. Cardinal Stritch University is a Catholic Institution of higher education. Cardinal Stritch was found and is sponsored by congregation if the Sister of St. Francis of Assisi. The Franciscan Values are Creating a Caring Community, Showing Compassion, Reverencing All of Creation, and Making Peace. The Kohlberg`s Three Levels and Six Stages of Moral Reasoning Lawrence Kohlberg, a professor of psychology in the University of Chicago, he created his own theory of moral development. The theory is based on children‘s reasoning, when facing moral dilemmas, however, Kohlberg went far beyond that and created a common theory for all ages. Under his theory moral thinking passes through six separate stages, which are broken into three levels. This paper aims to compare the Franciscan Values…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    re-read the news alert on her screen. The company had lost another major contract to Glistrom, a UK-based competitor it had regularly…

    • 2344 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crisp makes a credible argument that the Pongo Peach and Grecian Formula 16 ads were guilty of overriding the consumers' autonomy because they deceived the consumer by leading them to believe that the products were better than what they were. They used the consumer’s insecurities about themselves to make their products more appealing, causing the consumer to act on desires, rather than rationality. The problem with this type of advertising is that when people take a chance on something based on impulse, rather than facts. They risk their autonomy, which makes them want to purchase the product. I believe that Crisp’s rebuttal of Arrington’s four notions is valid. Autonomous desire is the first desire and fulfills the second desire, which is rational desire and choice. Free choice is the third desire, and finally, the fourth desire is control or manipulation. When it comes to the morality of “subliminal” advertising, my opinion is that it is simply business, and if business are going to profit, they have to use whatever tactic necessary to sell their product.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Filmore Case 1

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Let Lucinda run the business herself, holding on to the 63 percent of the shares and controlling the company.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He will get a handsome amount of $528,971 (Refer Exhibit 1) after selling off his business which will be sufficient to get her daughter complete her education and the family can easily. Also his Conchetta who was earlier working the assistant executive will find a new job very soon. Main problem in selling the business is making Rapini idle and made to sit at home but he has a passion of doing the business.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I) Yes, I think the suspension was fair. Over a period of time, Joan was warned several times abouther excessive absenteeism, both verbally and in writing, but she did almost nothing about resolving the problem. Joan hasn't shown an inclination to look for alternate solutions and she just expects GreatAmerican Market to put up with her excessive absenteeism, and the loss in productivity that comeswith it. It appears to me that only a suspension would drive the point hard in this case.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays