Preview

Brutus And Antony's Speech Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brutus And Antony's Speech Comparison
The overlook of Brutus’s and Antony’s speeches are not similar at all in my eyes. Brutus’s speech was trying to show the citizens that there was no harm in killing Julius Caesar, which there was. Brutus partially manipulates the citizens by saying how much he really loved Caesar, but loved the city of Rome even more. The citizens were moved by his speech because of how protected they felt by his words. Brutus talks good of Caesar, saying how there are tears for his love, joy for his fortune, honor for his bravery, but then death for his ambition. He shows the crowd how it was for the better of them. On the other hand, Antony’s speech rowled up the citizens more than they were passionate about Brutus’s speech. Antony put more of an emotion in his speech to the people. He showed how incredible of a man Caesar was and even showed proof of his will. Obviously the crowd easily changed their opinions about the whole situation and Antony knew just what to say and do. Antony was calm about the whole speech even when the crowd was begging for him to read Caesar’s will. Antony blamed Caesar's murder …show more content…
Brutus came out not knowing what he was going to get himself into and that’s probably why his wasn't as compassionate as Antony’s. Brutus trusted Antony and didn’t think he needed to compare his speech with anyone else’s. Antony’s speech connected with the citizens. His speech had emotion, hate, and revenge written all over it. Antony made pitty for Caesar by showing the people what Caesar had left for them. Antony knew what he was doing all along. He knew he had to get revenge on the conspiracers because they killed his friend, and this is what he had to do. Antony showed the citizens Caesar’s cloak and blamed each conspiracy for the murder. Throughout the whole speech Antony stayed calm and contained himself which is what the people want. Antony got what he wanted and he got it by having his speech win the people
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar's Funeral
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar's Funeral

    Brutus and Antony each gave their own speeches at Julius Caesar’s funeral to persuade the people of Rome to make them their new leader by using many rhetorical devices. Brutus came off as a traitor of Caesar, claiming that they killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome. He tried to overthrow what had occurred by striking fear into the people’s eyes, stating “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” By letting the people of Rome envision what horrible things and events would unfold if Caesar was still alive and ruler. He also uses fallacy to allow the audience to think about what their lives would be like tied down under Caesar’s rule then what it will be like with Caesar gone and…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

    Firstly, both of them used ethos in their speeches. Brutus was only able to persuade the people by implying them to believe that Caesar was too ambitious just because he said so, whereas Antony had actual reasons to be believable. "Believe me for my honor and have respect to mine honor that you may believe... not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more"(pg126:III:ii). Brutus, for a short while, convinced the crowd that Caesar was too ambitious and if he did not kill him, everyone would be slaves. "The noble Brutus told you that Caesar was ambitious...He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill... yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man" (132,134: III: ii). Antony additionally mentions that he knows Caesar wept when the poor wept and…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Rhetorical Strategies Of Brutus And Antony
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Of Rhetorical Strategies Of Brutus And Antony

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Senators Swansong
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Senators Swansong

    Brutus and Antony go in different directions when it comes to ethos. Brutus gets on the stage and says, “Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you might believe me” (III.i.14-15). He is telling the crowd to believe him based on his honor, and while they are judging what he has done, remember how honorable he is. His approach is formal and almost condescending. He is on the stage and he knows he has accomplished more admirable deeds than his audience which merits him honor. But, highlighting this sets him above his audience. Antony however comes up and says, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (III.i.60). This opening is similar to Brutus’ except for one key word, friends. This automatically changes the entire tone of the speech. Now, Antony approaches the crowd on the same level as them, as equals. He is no better, no worse. He is a citizen of Rome, just like them.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    On the other hand, Anthony's speech was not as subjective and serious as Brutus presented. Anthony displays a sly tone when he talks about Caesar. When Anthony says, "I came to bury Caesar not praise him" he is creating a realistic tone for the citizens. Anthony was much calmer in his speech than Brutus was when he stated evident facts. Whereas, Brutus wanted to persuade the citizens. Anthony did not portray a lot of emotions in his speech because he mainly focused on facts. However, Anthony did not really say a lot about the killing. Anthony was very fond of Caesar but not enough to grieve heavily for him. There are in fact keen differences between Brutus and Anthony's speeches. Brutus had plenty more emotions than Anthony. Also, Anthony's speech was not to gain sympathy like Brutus' speech was. The reoccurring commas in Anthony's speech helped establish pauses that created his tranquil yet logic diction. One can believe that Anthony had a more unprepared speech than Brutus because he paused after all the comments from the audience. Between both speeches, there was not a single use of Allusion used. It is evident that the main focus was on the diction and punctuation in the…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    This reflect poorly on Brutus' character because it shows that he was fine with betraying someone who thought so highly of him. It makes him seem uncaring, a trait that someone in power should not have. This portrays Brutus as cold-hearted. By saying this, Antony is building up Caesar's character. He shows his compassion for the people, and how he sees himself no better as the people- when they are sad, it affects him too. The makes him seem like a good…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    Antony had the better of the two speeches in the play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” By William Shakespeare. Antony does a very good job of molding the crowds mind about Brutus and to even show his sympathy about the death of Caesar. Brutus knows that he will lose this battle with Antony, yet he holds onto the hope that maybe, just maybe, that the crowd will believe him instead of Antony. “Et tu…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Caesar start

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony's Essay Example
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony's Essay Example

    First off how the speech was so persuasive was how he started off; "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him." Antony, contrary to what he says, actually means to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus and the conspirators, revenging Julius Caesar's death. Antony continues his speech by using the idea from Brutus' speech that Caesar was an ambitious man. Brutus used this thought to support his basis for killing Julius Caesar.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Devices In Mark Antony's Funeral Speech
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices In Mark Antony's Funeral Speech

    Already distrusted by the conspirators for his friendship with Caesar, it is obvious that Antony does not have it easy when he begins his speech. Brutus lets him speak at Caesar's funeral, but only after Brutus, an excellent speaker himself, spoke "to show the reason of our Caesar's death." He then allows Antony to say whatever he wishes as long as he speaks no ill of the conspirators. However, Antony has two advantages over Brutus: his skill at speaking and his chance to have the last word. It is safe to say that Antony makes the most of his opportunity.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Persuasion
    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus Persuasion

    It's just that Antony was better at manipulating the crowd to think the way he did. Brutus gave his speech well. He told them that the reason he killed Caesar was for Rome. For an example in Act III, Sc. 2 Brutus says “ If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (ln. 18-20) This means that killing Caesar was greater than their friendship and saving the people was more important. Another point Brutus got across was that the people of Rome can still respect Caesar even after Brutus had killed him. This made him sound more like a respectful leader and less of an evil murderer. Like in Act III, Sc. II Brutus says “Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, grace his speech tending to Caesar’s glories which Mark Antony, by our permission, is allowed to make.” (ln. 52-54) This is Brutus telling the crowd that they can respect Caesar and still look up to him. Another thing that made Brutus's speech well put together is that he gave the crowd a chance to speak up about the situation. For an example in Act III, Sc.II Brutus says “ If any, speak, for him have I offended. I pause for a reply.” (ln. 29-30) This shows that Brutus isn't afraid to talk to anyone who doesn't agree or have any question to why he killed…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similarities Between Brutus And Julius Caesar
    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    Similarities Between Brutus And Julius Caesar

    I think that both speeches were very good and very persuasive. Brutus speaks first to ‘set the mood.’ His goal wasn’t to persuade the crowd but to tell them why he did kill Caesar. He speaks about how much he loves Rome and that killing Caesar was for the best. Although his speech seemed very formal it also seemed like he distanced himself from the public. It felt as if he were a messenger or that he couldn’t defend himself. On the other hand, Antony’s goal was to turn the public on his side. He slowly but surely gets the people in his favor. An example is when Antony goes off the stage and down with the people showing them he’s no better than everyone else. Antony also very kindly mocked Brutus.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics