Preview

Breaker Morant Monologue: Major Bolton

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Breaker Morant Monologue: Major Bolton
English Monologue
Major Bolton
Introduction:
Sitting at home, London in the winter of the year, 1902. It is mid night, he is sitting at home alone with a glass of whisky in his hand. It has been two weeks since the prosecution of Lt. Morant and Lt. Handcock, Major Bolton is reflecting the case and in deep regret. Major Bolton is represented as a kind man that did not want to be chosen for this case and hates the British Empire. He thinks that the Bushveldt Carbineer’s are innocent and that the whole case is a disgrace to England and the Queen.

My Father was probably the entire reason for becoming a solicitor. He used to say that if you worked hard and pulled your sleeves in life you would have possession of a good life and fortune. So I spent many years studying, passing the bar and doing just that. While his words have served me well the idea of duty (doing ones duty for country and war) seems harsh and I feel somewhat unprepared for what I have done and for the future in the name of law.

It all began most recently when I was asked to prosecute a case for the crown, involving Lieutenant Harry Morant and the whole British Empire. Lieutenant Harry Morant was charged for the killing of the Boer prisoners. He claimed that Sir Lord Kitchener had ordered him to leave no prisoners alive. Harry was known as a fantastic poet and horse breaker hence the name “breaker” Morant. However war is a terrible teacher where good men are asked to do unspeakable things. This case offers another pit fall. Sir, Breaker Morant in any other situation would be seen as a good soldier. What I don’t understand is how can those in trusted with defending the crown be sentenced to death for killing when their job is to kill, It doesn’t make sense. I felt ashamed of myself during the trial, prosecuting innocent men, It made me want to throw up. Also knowing that no matter what evidence the defence gave, in the end Lord Kitchener would have the final say. Even if I was for or against the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    I anxiously look around as I enter the courtroom, the benches are empty from left to right . All the judges have their eyes on me and it is not the kind of spotlight I want. Immediately, my eyes fall down to the ground as I walk with Mr. Proctor by my side. I am here today to confess that I saw no spirits o and that poppet was mine and not Goody Proctor’s. I am willingly to confess to help Mr. Proctor protect Goody Proctor from wrongful accusations of witchcraft. Moreover, I am terrified if I say something wrong I might get hanged today. As we walk towards Judge Danforth I seem to think he is fascinated by my presence.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monologue of Tybalt

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am Tybalt, a Capulet and cousin of Juliet. I am known as short-tempered, impulsive, and a vengeful person, I draw my sword anytime I can. However I am loyal beyond words and honour the family rivalry between the Capulets and the Montagues with great heart. I will never betray the Capulets. On the day of Capulets’ party Romeo showed up. I recognised Romeo through his disguise at the Capulets’ ball. I can’t remember that we invited him to our party. Why is Romeo here? What is his intention of showing up at my Uncle Capulet’s ball? He is a Montague and I loathe all the Montague because they are our enemy. He is not allowed to come to our party. I would have killed him or make him leave the ball immediately if not forbidden by my uncle. He stopped me because he didn’t want to make a scene at the party. I could have choose to disobey my uncle but if I do that he will be mad at me so I have no choice but listened to my uncle. However I won’t let him live so easily I will make his life miserable. I will take revenge on him next time I meet him. Therefore I have a plan, I will fight Romeo at the city centre but I will be banished if I start a fight with him. In that case I will provoke Romeo at the city centre of Verona so he will start a fight with me. When the prince found out that Romeo starts a fight with me he will banish Romeo from Verona forever instead of me. I sent a challenge letter to Romeo for a duel to the death and vowed to meet him later on. I didn’t know if Romeo will show up but I went off to look for him after the masked ball. Instead of finding Romeo I found his friends, Benvolio and Mercutio. After Romeo arrived, I confronted him to fight with me, but he refused. But his friend Mercutio winded me up after that so I started a fight with him. Romeo tries to stop us, but I stab Mercutio. I ran away after I stabbed Mercutio but I still have my sight set on killing…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “the moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.” In the short story, “Gentlemen Your Verdict”, twenty men and their captain become trapped in their submarine after an explosion. Their captain, Captain Oram, then unjustly sacrifices fifteen of his men to save five others. He takes it upon himself to make a life or death decision for fifteen innocent men. Justice is important to regulating actions and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense), but in the case of Captain Oram, fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment, and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Executions

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    An execution is the carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person; the killing of someone as a political act. Execution of criminals and political opponents has been used by nearly all societies—both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. This paper examines three executions: the execution of Mary Queen of Scots in 1587, the execution of Joan of Arc in 1431, and the execution of John Wayne Gacy in 1994. In history books, all three executions represent the sentence of death on a condemned person. However, one difference is that the methods of execution, the public perception of execution, and requirements to earn a death sentence have changed dramatically from 1431 to 1994. Mary Queen of Scots was charged with “treason”…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A town meeting has been called earlier today, demanding the dismissal of the British soldiers, and the trial of Captain Preston and his men for murder. Unfortunately at the trial, John Adams and Josiah Quincy II defended the British, leading to their release. Samuel Quincy and Robert Treat Paine were the attorneys for the prosecution. Luckily, two of the British soldiers were found guilty of…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The officer condemns to death anyone brought to him on suspicion of breaking the law. He does not question the alleged, give him a chance to defend himself, nor does the officer search for evidence beyond one person’s claim. He simply believes that “Guilt is never to be doubted” (Kafka 145). This seems flawed to Western individuals who support a justice system that appreciates the value of human life. However, the officer seems to more greatly appreciate the value of human destruction. For instance, the officer exclaims on page 154, “How we all absorbed the look of transfiguration on the face of the sufferer, how we bathed our cheeks in the radiance of that justice, achieved at last and fading so quickly!” (Kafka). The officer is conveying a sense of captivation with the justice that is served at the suffering of the condemned. Human life is easily…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hidden

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The essay “He Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague”…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the trial of Captain Preston and his soldiers, copies of “A Narrative of the Late Transactions at Boston” began to circulate around Boston and surrounding areas. Captain Preston’s descriptions of the events were biased and unsympathetic to the townspeople, painting a picture of the soldiers trying to do their job and the townspeople not abiding and being “unruly” and “abusive”.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is something that has been debated over by the public for ages whether if it is impartial to take away another human’s life. For politicians it’s a way to extract dangerous criminals, but is it appropriate to take another human life due to a crime? “A Hanging” by George Orwell presents the perspective of a guard ordered to take a prisoner to the gallows for hanging as a result of an unknown crime. Throughout the essay Orwell uses symbolism of life and death to convey his animosity towards the capital punishment through the perspective of a guard in Burma during British Imperialism. “A Hanging” a hanging by George Orwell uses examples of life and death to assert Orwell’s distain towards capital punishment before the hanging of the prisoner, at the gallows, and after the hanging.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gentlemen, Your Verdict

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this story Gentlemen your verdict, the captain of a submarine, L-C Oram, is put in a difficult situation which results in him sacrificing 14 of his men including himself, to save 5 men with families waiting for them back home. Of course killing people is wrong, but if I, or anyone else, was put into a situation like L-C Oram was, then I think it would be okay to…..as bad as that sounds. In situations like these, I think there are some exceptions to killing people. He wasn’t trying to murder his crew for fun, he had good intentions! He did it so that 5 men could go home to their families. He even sacrificed himself! He was being generous and thinking about the wives and children on those 5 men. L-C Oram had no choice! He was the captain, it was his duty to do the right thing….whatever that may be. He had no time to think, and there was no way he could save all the men in the submarine. He was even kind enough to make sure the crew died somewhat peacefully with the poison. But, this short story doesn’t make any sense at the end when the jury is asked “So gentlemen, guilty or not guilty?” Obviously he is guilty since he killed 14 other men and himself on top of that. I don’t see why he is on trial in the first place, he is dead! You can’t send a dead body to jail. Oram acted in the moment, anyone else would do the same thing. At least he saved the men that he did. In my opinion, he was a true captain. Everyone makes mistakes, even if this was a big one. I’m sure many others would agree with me that the only thing he is guilty of is being a true captain. A…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Dilemma

    • 685 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The world of morality does not always operate in shades of black and white, more often than not it ventures into realms of different hues of gray. Who should be allowed to decide one’s life? People with faith in the justice system believe that the choice should be left to a judge and jury; people with faith in religion believe the choice can only be made by a god. What about one man? In “Gentlemen, your verdict” by Michael Bruce, Lieutenant-Commander Oram must sacrifice the lives of some of his crew in order to save five men. Furthermore, “The Firing Squad” by Colin McDougall, is about Captain John Adam and how he has to choose between getting his bad records erased forever and starting from scratch or carrying out the execution of Private Jones. The protagonists in the both stories are facing moral dilemma, a sense of duty and their manhood and courage. However, can anyone be allowed to decide the fates of others? And how can we be sure that we have acted morally in a serious situation?…

    • 685 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Breaker Morant

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central concern of the play Breaker Morant, written by Kenneth Ross in 1979 are the courts martial of three Australian Army officers of the Bushveldt Carbineers serving in South Africa during the Second Boer War (1899-1902). Lieutenants Harry "Breaker" Morant, Peter Handcock, and George Witton who are accused of the murder of one Boer prisoner and the subsequent murders of six more. In addition, Morant and Handcock are accused of the sniper-style assassination of a German missionary. During the time the play was written, Australian’s had grown to develop their own national identity, a set of proud and courageous values that recognised the essence of being an Australian, which was regarded to be truly unique from the British society and their way of life, thus the necessity for Australia’s independence from the British was becoming increasingly radicalised. As a result the play is based on real…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays