Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

bismark essay

Good Essays
1115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
bismark essay
Bismark is a man who was thought to be the winning trigger towards German unification. He aimed to increase the power of Prussia by whatever means necessary. as a result of Bismarcks leadership, Prussia was declared victorious in the FRanco-Prussia war against France in 1870, which altimately led to the eventual unification of Germany in 1871. This outcome made many people generaly accept that bismarck alone was responsible cor ghe unification of Germany under Prussian domination. however since that time other factors have been considered, such as Prussias economic strength and its military, nationalism and the decline of Austria. all of these things bruahg toether a larger Germany so it is possible to argue that Bismark did not make Germany: rather Germany made Bismarck.
Bismarck took the initiative, as opposed to Austria, in the war against denmark. he done whatever was best for germany in order to publish his sense of leadership. he controlled all foreign interference when prussia was against france. many believed he was born - in 1815 - in order to be the hero for germans unification. he had good relationships with other countires such as Russia, he know for prussias securit being fiendly with Russia would be key. he supported king williams budget dupiute by going to paris and solved that said despute. bismarcks actions and succes seemed too good to be true, historians arued that bismarck always did have a long-term plan for the unification of germany whereas others argued that he followed a day-to-ay policy, taking a course most likely to achieve his aims. bismarck first gave some support to the ideas if liberalism and nationalism, but he later changed his mind. as he himself noted in 1898: "my sympathies remained on the side of authority".
Nationalism in Germany was on a stady pace of growing round about 1850. This was round about the end of the napoleonic wars in 1815 where the Deutscher Bund was created which was a German confederation aiming to bring toether the 39 states of Germany. This is evidence which shows that before Bismarcks actions, German nationalism was already many years old. At this period for Germany, unification was more a progress than a completed aim, they now communicated and could trade with each other which before was seen unlikely to ever happen. the Zollverien was created to break down the customs barriers between the different states. although this had some succes for germany it did not create full unification. another attempt to bring together the states of germany was the Frankfurt Parliament in 1848. These two factors are only a small part of the whole road towards a united germany which was why nationalism only played a small part when helping to create the idealistic view on Germany.
It can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. Bismarck meanwhile took Duke Augustenburgs forces under his control, which angered the Austrians yet both countries met at Gastein in 1865 and "papered over the cracks". However in 1866 the Austrians frustrated that the final decision about Schleswig-Holstein had not been braught to the attention of the Diet of Frankfurt. Bismarck took charge of all the frustration which made Germany be seen as the more 'organised' country. However the Austrians braught on their own frustration, Bismarck did not weaken his own opponents.
When the German Confederation was introduced in 1815, Austria was the leading state out of the 39. They held the place as the most influential and dominant force in the Confederation. Since the introduction of the German Confederation in 1815, Austria and Prussia began a period of rivalry. Austria was the most powerful state in the confederation, allowing them to control most of what was going on. As time progressed Austria faced a series of severe defeats against Napoleon in the first decade of the century which meant Austria had to accept the abolition. .The Austro-Prussian War of 1866 saw Austria suffer a crushing defeat in only 6 weeks; as a result, she was thereafter excluded from German affairs all together. Additionally, Austria lost influence and territory in Italy. So, Austria's decline during the 19th century was caused, firstly, by Napoleon,who undermined the traditional Hapsburg powerbase in Germany, and then by the rise of Prussia. This was a great impact when unifiying geman however the affects of war meant Germany could suffering due to a lack of food during war and financially.
Blood and Iron is the title of a famous speech by German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck given in 1862 about the unification of the German territories. It is also a famous phrase that Bismarck uttered near the end of his speech that has become one of his most famous quotations.In September 1862, when the Prussian Landtag was refusing to approve an increase in military spending desired by King Wilhelm I, the king appointed Bismarck as Minister-President and Foreign Minister. A few days later, Bismarck appeared before the Landtag's Budget Committee and stressed the need for military preperation. He concluded in his speech that the position of Prussia in Germany wont be determined by its liveralism but by its power, he said what prussia should and shouldnt concentrate on and it must be done though "Iron and Blood" - which was made the title of that speech and remembered by many as part of the road towards the unified Germany. in conclusion, bismarck was undoubtably a very controlling factor when looking at the unification of Germany. although the leadership of Bismarck did help trigger other important factors in germany, he did not fashion German unity alone he exploited powerful forces which already existed and just made them stronger. this included prussia as a whole, strength and power which overall put austria into decline. other countries made many mistakes during the time of bismarcks actions which is why it was seen as one of his successes, however those countries caused most of their own mistakes. bismarcks role when over viewed is - in many historians eyes - the most important factor because he took control when all the wars where happening and he kept other countries on a friendly level to stop any confliction in germany, without him the eventual unification of germany in 1871 may never have came around.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War I: Study Guide

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    -In 1890 when Germany’s foreign policy changed Willhem II (Ger. Ruler) forced Bismark to resign because he did not want to share power with anyone and wanted to glorify the german army…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As nationalism and its ideas began the journey across Europe, it started to unite people into nation states. One of the prime examples of this unity is Germany. Before Germany was united as a whole in 1871, the nation was separated into Germanic states and Prussia. Determined to unite them into Germany because of their ethnicity, Wilhelm hired Otto Von Bismarck, who was just the guy to bring everyone together. Bismarck had used carefully thought out tactics to unite the Germanic states. They needed Prussia in order to become a powerful Germany. “Prussia….could no longer carry alone the power Germany required for its security” [Bismarck, Document 5]. Finally getting Prussia after the Franco-Prussian War, Germany was then united as a proud and powerful Germanic nation. The French were also united through Nationalism. After realizing their…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bismark believed he was being led by God to bring all of Germany together. This to me sounds very Hitler-esque and very much like someone who is going to step on everyone in his path to get what he wants. He attacked Denmark and then Austria, even though the King of Prussia was against it. While I see where his thought process was, and why he attacked to unite his country, the King was very hesitant to have “Germans shooting at Germans”. After the wars, Bismark had what he wanted as far as national pride and Germans having a sense of country and dedication to the father land. This is where his effectiveness as a leader ends.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political structure at that time led to Bismarck's success in war. With the untimely death of the Danish King, Christian…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Von Bismarck ran in office from 1862 to 1890. This impacted Germany by changing the power given to each country in Europe. According to the New York Times article “British Votes to Leave E.U., Cameron Plans to Step Down”, nationalism is represented by the decision the people of the nation of England. This article…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He quickly learned how to play the uber Catholic, conservative, and liberal sides when needed, and he eventually learned how to balance his policies so that each side remained fairly contained (Doc 4). During the 1800s, talk of liberal reforms, socialism, and communism was rising. Many people in the German government realized this insurgent of new thoughts and encouraged Bismarck to modify his policies. Politicians such as Wagener in document three wrote to audiences in the Reichstag and even Bismarck himself because the politicians knew that they could not risk losing the worker’s votes to the Socialist Party who promised laborers their own rights and insurance (Doc 3). Bismarck realized his politicians spoke the truth. From Bismarck’s point of view, he knew that if he didn’t adapt at least some version of these rising demands, he would remain Chancellor for a very short time. Thus, when it came to social reforms, Bismarck adopted his own version of the socialist party’s platform. He stated he would compromise by taking on some socialistic reforms because those reforms were a way to help those who cannot help themselves (Doc 6). Even the Kaiser himself realized his government must make their own approach to social reform. Bismarck promoted accident coverage for laborers and welfare for people who do not have the ability to work-- all ideas sprung from moderate…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This helped to convince the citizens that their home country was the best and could never be conquered. In London, nationalism was being spread through literature. Cheap novels, short stories, and essays were published talking of future wars and invasions that were inevitably coming from German, Russian, and French forces. Lastly, in Germany, nationalism was used to build up the new nation and gain support from the public. All of German culture was bolstered and revered.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bismarck almost single-handedly unified Germany and brought it to one of its most prosperous points in history. Some may say Bismarck was a diamond in the rough. After all, he came from a very unusual background but that did not stop him from achieving greatness even in his younger years. Otto von Bismarck was born the first of april in 1815 in the german…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays