Many people believe that a child's placement in the family, such as oldest, youngest, or middle kid, influences the character traits of the child. The youngest child is usually the most easily spoiled and is more likely to be the popular kid or the lead clown in a group of kids. The only child tends too have problems with sharing, the oldest is always bossy, the youngest is always spoiled, and the middle kid is just stuck in the middle. I like to think of it there were right and left extremes. On the right extreme, there is the older child: bossy, and with less freedom. On the left extreme is the youngest child: spoiled, just a little baby sometimes. And then there's the middle kid: He/she's just somewhere in the middle, between all the bossiness and babyish traits.
I am the middle kid in my family. The worst things about being the middle child is just that, being in the middle. When I was a little kid my older would always pick on me, he would always try to tell me what to do. I don't like having a younger brother either. The little brother is the one who will always try to get me into trouble. Its impossible to blame anything on the little one because I'm older …show more content…
I personally like being the middle child. I don't think I should want to change my birth order as if I could. I was put here in the middle spot to learn from that position, its not my place to change it. I don't know what it is, there must be just some things that can only be learned from this position. I can learn from other people's mistakes, I don't have to make them first before I learn. The middle child is usually quiet. This is why many people take advantage of them; they are seen as unable to defend themselves, or they don't care if they are made fun of. That's why everyone makes jokes about the middle child. And the middle kid can just sit back and laugh, knowing that the one making the joke doesn't understand or that they are just