Preview

Beneficiary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
429 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Beneficiary
1. How much money each beneficiary receives if the jurisdiction follows the rule that “issue” means "per stirpes"; How much money each beneficiary receives if the jurisdiction follows the rule that “issue” means "per representation"
In estate planning, “per stirpes” means that if the beneficiaries are to share a distribution, then the closest living members in the class of beneficiaries will receive an equal amount of the deceased shares. Under the "per stirpes" distribution, the deceased’s estate is to be divided by the number of living or surviving members closest in relation to the deceased. Each of the living members takes their equal share, and any shares of a deceased member will drop down to the following generation. The same process is then repeated to that generation, and the share is then divided by the number of living who are either alive or are survived by issue (person's children or other lineal descendants such as grandchildren and great-grandchildren). This process will continue down the family tree until all of the shares are taken.

In this family’s situation Samantha will get a third of her fathers shares as a sole surviving child ($66,666.66). Steve, her brother has his 1/3 of his fathers shares divided by the four of his surviving children. Johns grandchildren (Don, Donna, Doug, and Derek) will get equal shares of their fathers 1/3, which means that they will get 1/12th ($16,666.665 each) of the share each. Tina's 1/3 will also go to her children as she is also deceased. Alicia and Allison, Tinas children and johns grandchildren will both equally get 1/6 of the 1/3 of their mothers share which would equal out to be $33, 333.33.

2. How much money each beneficiary receives if the jurisdiction follows the rule that “issue” means "per representation"
However, if a member of the beneficiaries who is closest in relationship to the deceased is survived by any descendants, then that deceased beneficiary’s descendants will take “by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First of all I would advise them to open a Revocable Living Trust for Willis and one for Wanda and a children’s trust with a spend thrift clause to keep the children from spending their inheritance foolishly. Trust funds up to $5,120,000 are excluded from the estate taxes, so I would fund Wanda’s trust to that amount and, fund Willis’ trust with the rest. This would give them lower estate taxes because they would not be paying on the total amount. These trusts will also avoid probate when the time comes. I would have the children listed as…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9) Mike transfers securities to an irrevocable trust and gives Rachel the power to determine who will receive the trust's income and assets. Rachel, her estate, and her creditors cannot be beneficiaries or receive the trust assets. Rachel has a general power of appointment.…

    • 9691 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue is to determine how the $300,000 fee that John received is to be…

    • 2389 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taxation Law Assignment 2012

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages

    However, since Emma has arranged for 10% of her salary to be directed to her sister, we consider whether there is an implication on the full amount of her salary being AI. According to the constructive receipt rule, s6-5(4) ITAA97, even though Emma is not the recipient of that 10% of her salary, she is deemed to have also derived it as soon as it is dealt with in accordance to her directions. Thus, the 10% is still part of her AI.…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The whole idea is that where a decedent’s heir is not living, that heir’s descendants take in his stead. In per stirpital distribution, spouses of heirs are not relevant. When an heir is living, their children are irrelevant. (DUH)…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    State intestacy laws usually do not provide for asset transfers ro non-relared parries, including rhe surviving…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * This is a will contest case involving a codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Wheelock A. Bisson, M.D., deceased.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exam w answers

    • 5251 Words
    • 21 Pages

    On January 2, 2013, Henry, Cabot, and Lodge formed a three-person equal partnership with Henry and Cabot each contributing $100,000 and Lodge contributing securities with a basis to him of $60,000 and a fair market value of $100,000. On February 28, 2013, the partnership sold the securities for $130,000. The amount of the gain to be allocated to Lodge is:…

    • 5251 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts 1 Outline Pittman

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages

    i. Traditional Rule: Pecuniary losses(money benefits) only (pg. 597 note 1): measured by determining the monetary contribution that decedent would’ve made during his lifetime to the P beneficiary…

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Section 4 requires the input of the address of the descendant when he/she passed away. This needs to be the immediate address at the death.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Child Support Worksheet

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. All payments shall be made through the Support Payment Clearinghouse pursuant to an Income…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Auditing Chapter Two

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (TCO 4) To succeed in an action against the auditor, the client must be able to show that:…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to leaving any inheritance to children it can become very difficult deciding on how to disperse of the assets equally, as there are many factors that can come into play by deciphering between equality and fairness when it is concerning multiple assets. For this specific case study, we know Anwar and Leah would like to be as fair to their children as possible. We know the following; in the result of the first death assets will be given to the surviving spouse, and after the second death they will be rolled out to their children, probate fees are not factored in to their assets, and all assets will remain the same value as currently noted for the purpose of this case study.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    partnership questions

    • 17036 Words
    • 69 Pages

    Jared owns a 40% interest in the capital and profits of the JAJ Partnership. Immediately before he receives a proportionate nonliquidating distribution…

    • 17036 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Probate Court

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages

    being unanimously selected by all the heirs. (This alternative does not apply if the surviving spouse is the sole heir and an action for divorce or separate maintenance was pending at the time of decedent’s death.)…

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays