Preview

Atheism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Atheism
“It is possible for atheists to be as moral as religious believers.”
Moral: concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character.
In response to this statement, we first should look at the definition above. I don’t believe that you have to be religious to have morals. Growing up some of us are raised to believe in a religion and God. As we get older it may not be the way we choose to live. We may need more than what we read or what is told to us. Sometimes we hear or see things that happen that are dishonest among the religions whether it be priests, teachers, or someone of authority and the morality of these religions come in to question. People are so quick to point out others wrong doings without first checking themselves. Some, not all, religious people who see themselves as authorities to others are the first ones with no moral value. I was raised catholic all my life as were my children, but there are so many issues that I could talk about, but this is not the forum for that. However, I will say that I absolutely agree with that statement. I don’t believe that you have to believe in a God to have morals.
Atheists believe that values, including morality, come from people like themselves; the values and morality are the same whether one believes in gods or not. The moralities found in scriptures of various religions are remarkably similar, even if the theology is very different. The common threads of morality in these different theologies are the people who wrote them. Atheists, just like any of those people, share the same sense of morality. The morality of atheists is in a sense more noble by definition than the morality of theists. While theists believe that god will punish them for immoral acts and reward them for moral acts, atheists have no motivation to be moral other than their own innate sense of morality. It is morality for its own sake, not out of fear for punishment or desire for reward.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Because of this dilemma, philosophers have tried to create a secular ethic in order to avoid it. But, according to Kai Nielsen, “Religious morality… may have its difficulties, but secular morality, religious apologists argue, has still greater difficulties.” He then explains that without some great consequence, or without any bigger purpose for living morally, then there would be no reason to live morally, or to even define what morality consists…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People are extremely motivated by self-interest, even as societies have evolved and grown larger. While the more intertwined societies did lead to a greater need for cooperation in order to live as peacefully as possible, the need to follow the rules of that society can still be ignored when self-interests are present. The need to live by a set of moral rules is well explained by connecting God and morality. As God holds a person accountable, following the moral rules is now is that person’s interest. So even while the person may act according to society, the actions are still explained by the incentives and sanctions placed by God with the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, respectively. However, the Divine Command Theory falls short by basing morality solely on God’s commands. Morality then seems subject to God’s whims, which makes morality arbitrary. The opposing view counters strongly with the existence of morals within atheists. For if morals are based only on God’s will, then atheists must be godless brutes lacking any semblance to a moral compass. The morality of atheists is clearly evident, yet the argument failed to establish a reason for morals other acknowledging damage done to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, everyone has the natural inclination to sleep, eat, drink, and procreate. Within the text, Euthyphro, we discussed Socrates conviction for believing in the Natural Law Theory and for the rumors that he was poisoning young people’s minds. The Gods were angry with Socrates and they believed he had no religious beliefs for this reason. They did not want Socrates to ruin the kids minds with having them think on their own deciding what they believe is right and wrong. The Gods want them to factor in what they say right and wrong is like the Divine Command Theory. The problem with this theory is that everyone has a different set of morals. For example, some people believe that finding money on the ground and not returning it as moral because somebody lost it and it is unlikely they will find the rightful owner. Other people might find that completely immoral and turn the money in as soon as they find it. Also, if murder was morally correct according to the Gods, does that mean we have to believe that as…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every people have their own beliefs, rules to follow. Examples of those rules are the 10 commandments which created by God and the golden rule who’s came from Confucius. For many people, the terms "morality" and "religion" are vaguely related yet distinctly different ideas. Morality, we like to say, pertains to an individual's conduct and his or her relationships with other people. Morality involves relationships between human beings. Morality is concerned with conduct in the here and now. Religion involves the relationship between human beings and God, or transcendent reality. Religion is concerned with how conduct in the here and now will influence one's standing in the here after. Whereas a "religious" person believes in an afterlife, a "moral" person need not believe there is anything after death except bodily decay. And as a Christian I do believe in God’s words, God’s existing, but as a person who has morality I’ll choose the golden rule.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with the claim because I believe that morals are learned not innate. I believe that your upbringing and environment have a vastly important role in molding children into the adults they will eventually become. And in a society where it is looked upon with esteem…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Cambridge Dictionary, Morality is a personal or social set of standards for good or bad behavior and character, or the quality of being right, honest or acceptable. It is characteristically the way you make decisions based on what you think is right or wrong. It is this same principle that today is affecting the Christian Population. Christians are being tormented with daunting questions such as: Am I doing the right thing? Should I do the right thing even though it may end up affecting me? How come nonbelievers get to have fun and I can’t? Just because I attend church and I am a Christian, does it mean that I have to do what the church says? on a daily basis.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Can One Be Moral

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Atheism is obviously the rejection of belief in the existence of deities. The word Atheism is truly a Greek term meaning without Gods. Most Atheists believe there is not enough empirical proof to bring into being an existence of God. at that place are many atheists who live ethical lives and have high moral principles, but because they reject the mind of there being a God they are looked at as being bad peck. There are some who actually believe that atheists are incapable of having a long system of morality because they do not possess religion. There is even a term coined moralistic atheists. These are the atheist who offended people think that they lack morality by giving up God. Morality can be what a person inherent rules of right and wrong that were not given to them by anyone or anything, they are inherent morals that each person is given. Another way a person can look at morality is the obvious religious implications that morals come from religion and religion only, which what God says to be right and wrong are right and wrong because God is all wise and knows the morals that we should follow to be happy. Another way that morality is described is not in the terms of religious contexts, nor is it the inherent good that every person is born with, it is the rules of right and wrong that each individual person has adapted for themselves as to what they think right and wrong truly are. There are many things that can shape…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The King James bible tells us “And it repented the Lord that he had made man on earth, and it grieved him at his heart” (Genesis 6:6). But also as Nietzche’s comment suggests, perhaps God was created by us humans and an atheist might contend that we have done so mainly as a means to cope with thoughts about our own mortality. This report analyses and compares the Catholic religious tradition, in which God and the afterlife are key beliefs, with the secular world view of atheism, which in this report is the belief that there is no God.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A moral absolute is the idea that there are God given rules and that those who break them are immoral. Some examples of moral absolutes are the 10 commandments and the 7 deadly sins. 1960’s brought a sexual and moral revolution, which was seen as a major catalyst for atheism of symptom of growing atheism. People began to reject religion on the grounds that they wanted to have sex without it being thought of a sin if it is not within marriage. The invention of the pill and the beginnings of capitalism in the 1980’s lead to us rejecting sexual ethics and beliefs that greed/gluttony/sloth were wrong. Capitalism encouraged us to embrace our desires. When we embraced capitalism and the new sexual freedom given to us by contraceptives we lost interest in religion and what seemed like an old fashioned morality. The rejection of moral absolutes means that we are going against God’s will of how He wants us to act therefore with the rejection of moral absolutes, we are rejecting religion, thus we are not following a religion which classes us as atheists and this gives another explanation to the rise of…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atheism essay

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Atheism is defined as the denial of God’s existence, the gradual exclusion of God from all aspects of culture, and the establishment of a materialistic lifestyle” (Hill, 16). Most of us are familiar with the atheism that had its roots in the Enlightenment and fully grew out in the nineteenth century. “In the ancient times atheism seems to refer more to heretical views of God than to the denial of God’s existence. The atheist was the one who disagreed with the conventional wisdom about the divinity. Such a position was often seen as worthy of condemnation and was even punishable by death” (Hill, 16). In the contemporary era there are many forms of atheism. The first form of atheism is atheism of the academy. “This form of atheism is common among secular intellectuals who accept only those realities that can be brought before the bar of reason for critical judgment” (Hill, 23). On the other hand, the ancient world was about natural and historical events that resulted of a higher divine will. The second form of atheism is materialistic atheism. “This form of atheism is common among those whose ultimate values are found in consumer goods, investments, and pleasure” (Hill, 23). Another form of atheism that is similar to this is the atheism of the marketplace. “This form of atheism appears among those in industry and corporate life, who absolutize profit and success” (Hill, 23). The last form of atheism is the atheism of indifference. “This form of atheism does not see the relevance of God to any events, realities, or the carrying on of everyday life” (Hill, 39). This form of atheism develops and drives towards personal autonomy and individualism. On the other hand, ancient atheism was about God being a part of the universe, or history or personal life. God was related to the natural and historical events that occurred.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    God and Morality

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Religion differs from morality or having a moral system. Religious morality is based on stories or events that are past. These stories and events are used to justify the behavior that religion prohibits or requires. At…

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can One Be Moral

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Can one be moral and not believe in God? Let’s start by defining what it is to be moral or have morals. Morals simply is defined by Webster as “of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior,” (Merriam-Webster, 2011) When you believe in a spiritual being this can play a major role in one’s moral belief. If one do not believe in God or a spiritual being then it would not be hard for an individual to believe that having morals have nothing to do with believing in a spiritual being. Therefore we have people who do not believe that believing in God is a necessary factor in order to have…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Problem of Evil

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atheists believe that if there really was an omniscient, omnipotent and good God or higher being, then he has the power to eliminate all evil and wipe it from the universe. However, Atheists believe that suffering cannot be prevented, therefore, God does not exist to them. The response to this belief is that the existence of evil is necessary for the existence of certain kinds of good (K. Augustine). Augustine gives an example of many character traits that are valuable only if evil exists. One of these traits is self sacrifice. In some writings, self sacrifice is for the greater good. If there was no evil in the world, then this character trait could not exist. God created us in a certain way so we would all form a community and look out for each other. If each of us were self-sufficient and there was no such thing as suffering, then the greater goods that come from this would have never happened (Augustine). Atheists will not change their beliefs…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is the principles concerning the difference between right and wrong. Ones behavior is affected by these principles. Morality is the belief that certain behaviors are good or bad. Morality gives human beings “laws” to live their lives by. Now morality can be seen in different ways. The laws that morality apparently gives us to live our live by, are given by “God”. Now not everyone feels that way, the religious people believe that God gave them a set of morals to follow, and they believe that people who don't believe in their God have no morals. Now speaking from the atheists side, they will say that even if they are not religious that they still have morals. I believe that knowing the difference between right and wrong is taught to everyone starting from birth. You also learn the difference from right and wrong when you make a mistake. A moral behavior gets a lot of approval, while any immoral acts are condemned.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Objectivity

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral objectivity is the position that certain acts are right or wrong, independent of human opinion. "It is always wrong to harm a child" and "It is always wrong to kill" are two examples of morals. There are no problems with the concept of objective morals; but if morals were not objective, then they would not meet the basic definition of the word "moral". But sometimes it can be a problem. "It is wrong to lie". But is it wrong to lie in order to protect someone you love? Some may say it is wrong, but some may say it is right. They understand the greater good is protection. Different religions have different morals. In many religions, there is no such thing as moral objectivity. For example, in the bible, God is the absolute source of morality. "One shall not kill" is a moral. But, Jesus Christ sacrificed himself, for the sake of the people. So, killing is not absolutely wrong, but there are times where it can be justified. People disagree about particular cases of right and wrong, and there are many different ethical theories about what is right and what is wrong. If one leaves God or The Ten Commandments out of the picture, they will most likely say that these morals are wrong because society says that they are right. If that is what they believe in, then they have to consider that what Hitler did was morally okay. He killed about eleven million people, with the permission of the German people. He was also voted as the supreme ruler, which made what he did legal. I think morals are personal, it is how you act on them. Morals are about our values and beliefs, these are defined individually. In my opinion, I think that there is no such thing as moral…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics