Preview

Assess The Role Of Monarchy In England's Constitutional Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
520 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Role Of Monarchy In England's Constitutional Government
England’s Constitutional Government
The monarch does not get the final say in a constitutional monarchy. An example of a constitutional monarchy is the United Kingdom because they have a monarch and a parliament. The role of monarch gets passed down through generation, but has little to no power. The people get to elect some of the leaders who make the laws. In a constitutional monarchy, there are three roles the monarch who is the symbolic head, the people who elect the representatives, and the representatives who make the laws.

The role of monarch gets passed down through generation. For example Order of Succession to the British Throne - Who will be next explained, the eldest child of the monarch is the heir.( Mandy Barrow) In fact who will be the next monarch is not determined by a vote but by birth. Further evidence states, the heir can pass on the role of monarch to his son without being king.(Order of Succession to the British Throne-Who will be next-Mandy Barrow). Therefore Queen Elizabeth's heir might never even be monarch only the prince of wales with his son being the next king instead. As a result, the royal family has a say in who the next monarch will be.
…show more content…
Evidence states, “The UK Parliament has MPs from areas across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.”(Uk parliament How MPs are elected). Thus there are a total of 650 MP’s because each constituency elect one. According to the UK parliament-How MPs are elected,”General elections happen every 5 years. If an MP dies or retires, a by election is held in that constituency to find a new MP for that area.” So there are always 650 MPs in the UK. In conclusion,the people vote to keep the government

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution of the United Kingdom is the sum of laws and principles that make up the body politic of the United Kingdom. It concerns both the relationship between the individual and the state, and the functioning of the legislature, the executive and judiciary.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1660, the British came back to England after 100 years. The British had abandoned the colonists and when they came back they would tax them and make them only trade with them. The British had the power to make the colonists do that , so technically they the British had the power to control them as well as they had the power to punish them. This is an example of tyranny because the British had absolute power to tell the colonists what to do. Their was about to be a tyranny in the constitution but, to avoid it the framers used federalism, separating federal powers, checks & balances , and small/large state compromise.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Magna Carta set limits on the power of the King, but did not disrupt the balance of power between the beholder of the high positions in Britian. The English monarchs enjoyed almost full power through the 18th century; Henry VII and Elizabeth are examples. They answered to Parliament sometimes, but mostly the Parliament answered to them since they held more power. It wasn't until the 19th century that the things began to change and form a new leadership that we later changed into what we have today. One example I would like to refer to is the reign of Elizabeth II. Her reign has been considered an un-necessary reign in England’s history. Although Royal Prerogatives still exist in Britain, many doubt that they will be employed.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Monarchies

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A new monarchy brings power to the royal family. It does this in many ways. A new monarchy reduces the power of nobility, and confiscates land from the nobles that are on "their" land. They also impose taxes and tariffs on whatever they want. A new monarchy will also create standing armies and hire mercenaries to protect their land and to grow their empire. Basically a new monarchy wants to bring money, power, and control to the royal family that is in rule. An example of two new monarchies is Henry VII of England and Ferdinand I of Spain. Both the royal families and states they represent are great examples of a new monarch from the time period of 1450 to 1550.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State. The ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected Parliament, not with the Monarch. Japan is an island on the east coast of Asia; this land was formed in 14,000 BC. Japan has a government that is called constitutional monarchy; they had a long-term monarchy in the past, then Japan went to war against the allied forces, when they lost, they were forced to adopt a democratic government, so that the allied forces would give them money. Japan has an Imperial House it is also called the Imperial Family and the Yamato dynasty.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In monarchies of the past, the monarch ruled over the people with unlimited power and…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important site in the British Constitution, although far more important in the past than today, is the royal prerogative. The United Kingdom has a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute monarchy. This means that the monarchy is apolitical and impartial. The defining characteristic of the prerogative is that its exercise does not require the approval of Parliament.…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of monarchy has been around for hundreds of years. The English monarchy has been around for quite a while as well. My opinion is that for how long the monarchy…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prime Minister and Cabinet

    • 3323 Words
    • 13 Pages

    There are no codified rules in the UK to state how government is formed, in theory it is in the hands of the monarch – up until the 19thCentury this was largely a reality. However the monarch no longer plays any active role in this process. The party that wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons after a general election, its leader will be invited by the monarch to form a government.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British Royal Family has long history in the Europe. Throne of England was first built in the ninth century. In the long history, the Monarchy was the most supreme rule in the country until 1688. This year, the glorious revolution began and overthrows the Stuart dynasty. Leaders were building the “constitutional monarchy” in the United Kingdom. Gough (1999, p48) states that the “constitutional monarchy” was a mixed monarchy and the Sovereign’s power was limited. It means: the Sovereign was the head of UK, but the government controls the country and leader was the Prime Minister. The Monarch, Parliament, Prime Minister constituted a complete political system. Today, the Sovereign is Elizabeth II. She was being Queen in 1952. According to the Constitution she is the head of the UK and commonwealth (Billig, 1992).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the line of British monarchs began in 1066 with William the Conqueror, a monarch and a royal family have been in place to watch over Great Britain. Monarchs from hundreds of years ago had power over everyone and they merely had to state what they wanted and it was done for them, however crazy a request. For example Henry VIII could just say ‘cut his head off’ and it was done without really much thought. Though, over the centuries: the role and importance of a monarch has largely decreased, as the state is now governed by Parliament. Gradually, over time Parliament has become very powerful and the jobs of a monarch were no longer instated. Monarchs today still have some power, but they are now there for more of a ceremonial reason rather than a political reason. The Queen, who is known as a constitutional monarch, must pass any laws which Parliament wish to be declared first. But in this day and age do we really need the royal family?…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The types of system of government Democracy and Monarchy are different from each other. The actual founder of the modern democracy was John Locke, who argued with Thomas Hobbes, the one who believed that one person king or queen should rule. Government has been an issue throughout time. Many different governments have been established, demolished and replaced over the time, but the question is which one is better? In democracy they give the people more freedom, and more voice to choose what is best for them, however in absolute power the ruler gets to choose what is good for the people or not. It’s becoming hard to decide the type of government system is best suitable for the society we live in. Monarchy and democracy both have advantages, and disadvantages, indeed; government is never established without them.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The queen is not important because she does not participate in the government or running the country the job is done by the Prime minister. The only thing she does is signs the final bill so that it becomes a law. Unfortunately she does not check it, or read it. The parliament decides amongst them by using a vote and debate system and decides on the bill. The queen is there used as a signer.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays