Preview

Assess The Contribution Of Functionalism To Our Understanding Of Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Contribution Of Functionalism To Our Understanding Of Society
Functionalism sees society as based on value consensus, meaning they see members of society as sharing a common culture. Culture, meaning, a set of shared norms (rules), values, beliefs, and goals. Sharing the same culture produces social solidarity, binding individuals together, telling them what to strive for and how to conduct themselves. Deviance is defined as a disobedience to social norms based on the value consensus, deviance is vital within society in order for it to be cohesive and functional within the community. Functionalists argue that in order to achieve this solidarity, society has two key mechanisms: socialisation and social control. Modern society is very complex, and especially in large cities, there are many people with many different cultures and lifestyles …show more content…
There are two sides to crime and deviance that help with the functioning of society. Firstly the positive side, this helped society change and remain dynamic. Durkheim believed a certain amount of crime was necessary for any society, (shared norms and values were important). This includes guiding our actions. There are three elements of the positive aspects, including reaffirming the boundaries; this re-affirms social norms and values, for example, people are taken into prison and sent to court for things that are considered breaking the law, in some cultures and religions this is taken to extremes with the use of capital punishment, to use them as an example to other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Culture is a concept that we as sociologists regard as a central ingredient in human behavior. As an integral part of every society, culture is a powerful concept that creates a feeling of belonging and togetherness among the people of that society. The essential feature of culture is that it is learned and transmitted from one generation to the next. Every culture is different. The attitudes, beliefs, customs and traditions of one culture can be, and often are very different in other cultures. In studying culture the sociological imagination allows us as sociologists to examine and analyze culture through a variety of different lenses. A functionalist perspective of culture sees society as a stable, orderly system with interrelated parts that serve specific functions (Pope 1975). The view from a functionalist lens enables one to see…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim argued that a certain amount of crime was ‘healthy’ for society and that it is deviant behaviour that provided a catalyst for social change. He said that crime and deviance are functional because the ritual of punishment is an expressive experience that serves to bind together members of a social group and establishment a sense of community; also known as re-affirming boundaries as the resulting media coverage publicly reaffirms the existing values. They are useful in introducing necessary changes and preparing people for change – as Durkheim argues all social change begins with some form of deviance; certain crimes when prosecuted illicit public sympathy and affect change in legislation policies – Kiranjit Ahluwalia, Rosa Parks. Durkheim also put forward social cohesion, this is when certain horrific crimes are committed the entire community are drawn together in shared outrage, such as September 11th Twin Towers, often resulting in public accepting legislative changes which severely impact upon out civil liberties. However Durkheim also seen negatives aspects of Crime and Deviance named ‘Anomie’ the point when crimes becomes dysfunctional. This is a condition characterized by the breakdown of norms governing social interaction. Durkheim argues that people can only be happy when their wants are commensurate to their means. He thought that humans are basically selfish in nature and if left to their own devices would in order to satisfy their own needs, commit crime if they could get away with it. A state of anomie would therefore occur where there are insufficient social controls to ensure conformity from individuals. He argued that this would normally occur in periods of great social change or stress, where the collective conscience may be weakened.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although criminal behaviour and activity is found most commonly in poorer economic societies it is also, although less common, found in middle and upper class societies too. This statement is supported by sociologist Emile Durkheim who said ‘there is no society that is not confronted with the problem of criminality’ (1938, 65-66). This is the view of a social positivist and relates to the first model of crime, the predestined actor model which looks at internal and external determinism. His book The Division of Labour in Society described how in periods of social change, in this case industrial development, consequences…

    • 3082 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism however argues the consensus view that law and norms about acceptable behaviour in any society are simply a reflection of the wider collective conscience and these laws and social rules are created and enforced to the benefit of everyone. Therefore deviance is behaviour that breaks these agreements on what is acceptable. Functionalists view this defining process as straightforward and objective.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline and evaluate functionalist views of the role of the family in society. (33 Marks)…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, major crimes occur in our society. Pick a current event (local or national) and describe the crime. Analyze the crime in terms of Durkheim’s four major functions of deviance.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime produces a reaction from society, uniting its members in condemnation of the wrongdoer and reinforcing their commitment to the shared norms and values. This explains the function on punishment. In Durkheim’s view the purpose of punishment is to reaffirm society’s shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. This can be done through the rituals of the courtroom; this reaffirms the values of the law-abiding majority and discourages others from rule braking.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Durkheim acknowledges that crime is essential in society. The aberration of a crime helps to define mora boundaries as well as serves as a reminder to obey social norms (RULES OF SOCIOLOGY METHOD). The Hisbah patrol cities to enforce the rules, and citizens find comfort in this dominating regulation (Vice News 2014). Criminals are shown to be grateful for their incarceration and whippings because it brings them closer to god, or as Durkheim would say, social norms. The punishment of criminals also brings communities togethers. They join to discipline deviances, creating a strong collective conscious with the desire to set social facts back in place. In one instance of many, a man convicted of murder was crucified and displayed in the public…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists see the source of crime as located within the structure of society and they believe society produces an individual and many of these functionalists also believe that crime serves a positive function in society. Functionalist supporters like Durkheim claim some crimes are inevitable in society and are impossible to vanish completely, and he believes these crimes can become a positive in society because when punishments are handed out to criminals this portrays a stern message that crime is wrong and won’t be tolerated and therefore discourages others in society to commit crimes and ultimately raises awareness of crimes.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologist Durkheim argued that deviance is a normal and necessary part of any society because it contributes to the social order. Functionalists such as Durkheim see society that is organized around consensus of values and norms. Their view is that society is essentially consensual and that most people conform, or aspire to similar values and ways of behaving. Durkheim thinks that every society shares a set of core values, which he called value consensus or collective conscience. The more behaviour differs from the core values, the more likely it is to be interpreted as deviant. Interactionists are critical of this definition of deviance, as it implies that these definitions are fixed, absolute and universally shared. Interactionists also reject the idea that modern western societies are organized around a consensus of values and norms. Interactionists point out that societies are too complex to have shared set of values.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Functionalism is a macro approach it contains a variety of institutions in society and how they are all dependent on each other; if one begins to fail it effects the rest of society. It is often referred to like 'the human body' society being the body and the organizations being the organs. When the organs (organizations) begin to fail due to deviant behaviour it effects the body (society) which can be fixed. Sociologist analysis the institutions of society as functioning smoothly and concord; as they contribute clear factors to society to make it function accordingly. Functionalism is beneficial according to (George Murdock 1897-1985) as it consider our values, so when crime or 'deviant behaviour' is publicized society comes together in mutual shock and disagreement which is why crime is heavily exposed in the media, Judicial system is heavily exposed as well, so society can carry out their roles and know the norms and laws and achieve that society is running smoothly. It also teaches the younger generation appropriate behaviours in society. The formation of boundaries; as society changes individuals become unsure about values and too much uncertainty in the public is bad for social cohesion. So when extreme fashions of deviances enables individuals to create moral boundaries, like sexuality functionalist argue that same sex couples are integrated part of society but should not be frustrated when conflicting their marriage rights, The economic function ensures that family has the reassurance and can provide food, shelter and be financially secured.…

    • 3743 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The norms become blurred and individuals become unaware of what is right or wrong in society (Lilly, J. Robert et al. 2007). An example of anomie in society is the summer riots of 2011, making news headlines across England. Durkheim would argue that this incident is a lack of norms; offenders being unaware of the adequate norms in society. The article (The Telegraph. 2011) called it a ‘crumbling nation’, supporting Durkheim’s theory of anomie, as individuals in the riot may have been unsure of the norms in society and as a result showed acts of rioting. This suggests that the functionalist theory can yet be applied to society today and explain why people commit acts of crime and…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Psychological study of decision making began after theories were introduced in order to understand an individual’s thought process when faced with decisions. The aim of these theories was to examine whether or not humans are rational decision makers by introducing probabilities and the evaluation of risk. This essay will evaluate The Expected Utility Theory, The Prospect Theory and other potential influences to decision making. As well as state both the strengths and weaknesses of them, in order to determine how they have contributed to the understanding of human thought and decision making.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Functionalism (or structuralism) versus intentionalism is a historiographical debate about the origins of the Holocaust as well as most aspects of the Third Reich, such as foreign policy. The debate on the origins of the Holocaust centers on essentially two questions:…

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance In Sociology

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Durkheim explains that crime in society display to people the difference between right and wrong, and what acts are breaking social-norms. Durkheim also stated that crime encourage group against group, in other words, the good against the bad. As an example in terrorist attacks, the crime of terrorism separates society from the good individuals against the bad people (terrorists) which also has an effect in having them punished and looked down upon. Another theory Durkheim has explained is the fact of being deviant and going against society to reach out for a change, this may be things such as protests. Durkheim has also said that minor law breaking and being deviant every now and then in our lives reduces stress and anger and helps us to lead better and healthier lives. Durkheim is not saying that crime is good, but rather that is serves good in society. Durkheim’s theory is somewhat about a normative theory but mainly it comes from the labeling perspective. The normative theory applies in the way that the social norms provide a guide for what is normal in society and how individuals should act, and why they get broken in society. The labeling perspective is what helps the society regarding crime; the labeling perspective focuses on the social audience and how they react to the crime. Many of Durkheim’s theories relate exactly to this, how crime shows…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics