Preview

Assess the consensus views to do with crime and deviance

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess the consensus views to do with crime and deviance
Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in society.

Consensus theories are the theories that believe that every society share the same views, norms and values. The main consensus theories are Functionalism and Subcultural. Functionalism is the theory of how or why society functions and how it remains in a state of stability. It tries to explain the role that all people within society have, from children to criminals, in order to maintain stability. Subcultural theorists, such as Cohen, hold the idea that there is nothing wrong with criminals and those who commit deviant acts. Instead, they support another set of values or a subculture. However, there are views that disagree with these, such as Marxism and Conflict sociologists.
Functionalist sociologists like Durkheim say that crime is normal and important in all societies. He says that there are two reasons why crime and deviance are found in all societies. Firstly because not everyone is equally effectively socialised into the shared norms and values, so some people will be prone to deviate. Secondly that mainly in complex modern societies, there is a diversity of lifestyle and values. Different groups develop their own subcultures with individual norms and values, and what the members of the subculture might think is normal, mainstream might see it as deviant. And that there is a tendency towards anomie. Similarly there is Merton’s strain theory. This is the argument that people deviate when they cant achieve socially accepted goals legally. For example they might get frustrated and resort to crime to get what they want or lash out in anger, or even turn to drugs. Finally there is Hirdchi’s control theory, which explains female crime. He argues that people act rationally and are controlled by being offered rewards in return for abiding to social norms. That people will turn to crime if they do not believe that the rewards will be imminent, and if the rewards

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of these theories has branches that further their explanation for the origin, nature, and extent of crime. Structural Functional Theory believes that values or beliefs are central and play a causal role in explaining crime and that crime can result from a breakdown or strain in social processes that produce conformity. The work in this theory focuses on institutions such as family, school, and the absence of law enforcement and how they socialize individuals to core values. The Symbolic Interactionist Theory, on the other hand, subtlety shifts the emphasis to values and the ways in which meaning and definitions are involved in explaining criminality. Interactionists believe that these meanings and definitions can shape deviant behavior and responses to it. Over time, this shifted the emphasis on meanings and definitions to a focus on the roles that official agencies of social control play in imposing these meanings and definitions on…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some sociologists believe that the initial cause of crime and deviance is attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group of individuals, due to their ethnicity, social background, or gender. Many sociologists argue that no act is criminal in itself, however it only becomes criminal when others label it so. The labelling theory tends to look more at societies reaction to the act rather than the nature of the act. Lemert says that it is ‘pointless to seek the causes of primary deviance’- this suggesting that deviance is unlikely to have a single cause.…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist explanations of deviance begin with society as a whole looking for the origins of deviance in the nature of society, not the biological or psychological make up of an individual. Functionalists favour quantative methods to look at society, using statistics to see society as a whole, rather than looking at the individual's effect on society.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists see the source of crime as located within the structure of society and they believe society produces an individual and many of these functionalists also believe that crime serves a positive function in society. Functionalist supporters like Durkheim claim some crimes are inevitable in society and are impossible to vanish completely, and he believes these crimes can become a positive in society because when punishments are handed out to criminals this portrays a stern message that crime is wrong and won’t be tolerated and therefore discourages others in society to commit crimes and ultimately raises awareness of crimes.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One key opinion of the functionalist perspective is that crime is a good thing. Factionalists view crime as beneficial for society because we can learn from it, they would argue that if, for example, a woman was walking alone in a short dress down a dark alleyway way in town and was sexually assaulted, then the rest of society could learn from this and avoid being alone, wearing revealing clothing and walking down dark alleyways. However, the victim does obviously not see this as positive! Because of the view that crime is needed, Emile Durkheim stated that crime was inevitable as it provided two main functions; ‘Boundary Maintenance’ and ‘Adaption to Change.’ ‘Boundary Maintenance’ is view that crime produces a reaction from society uniting its members in disapproval of criminals. This explains the function of punishment, which is to reaffirm society’s shared rules. ‘Adaption to Change’ is the view that all changes start with acts of…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Strain Theory

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many criminological theories to explain why crime and criminals work the way they work. Five theories are fit into a majority of today’s crime cases are Anomie theory by Emile Durkheim, General strain theory by Robert Agnew, Social Disorganization theory by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay, Social Bonding theory by Travis Hirschi, and the Containment theory by Walter Reckless. Anomie is when there is a clear lack of social norms and values. This is common among teens who grew up in a dysfunctional, abusive family. General strain theory is used an individual is strained and unable to cope with the strain so they commit their time to doing crimes. Social Disorganization theory shows why certain neighborhoods experience more crime rates…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structural functionalism argues that society is built on value consensus, which is a shared society of norms and values. They believe in each society, institutions work co-operatively to encourage harmony within society (Hodder. 1994).…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Theories are useful tools, which suggest the way things are and not the way things ought to be, we can use them to help us to understand the world around us. In terms of criminal and deviant behaviour the theories proposed in this subject area set out to try and give reason as to why an individual commits criminal or delinquent acts. In this essay I will be using biological, psychological and sociological explanations of criminality to suggest why individuals take part in criminal behaviours.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Early Functionalist ideas, as seen in Item A, are interested in explaining why some people in society break the rules and overall see crime as a group activity. The following approaches see the deviant as simply reacting to external forces largely beyond their control and see crime and deviance as social facts that can be measured in society.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociological Theories

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Crime- Functionalists believe that crime is a good thing because Rules are necessary for a society to function. Without the example of those who disobey the rules, rules would not be able to be made.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and deviance are always been a matter of fact, the ‘collateral effect’ of living among other people. Norms and rules are set in each society, from rural ones to the largest urban environments, but this cannot prevent the attitudes by some individuals, that in the most of case gang up, to not follow these norms. They are the deviant ones and they are condemned to be considered not normal, sometimes just without choosing that. Paradoxically, most of actions and situations that are considered as normal, under a more peculiar analysis may be not so ‘normal’. For example, the norms that consider smoking as a ‘crime’ are the ones that ban this action in public places, since smoking is injurious both to yours and to the others’ health but, in…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Functionalism is a theoretical orientation which views society as a system of interdependent parts whose functions contribute to keep society alive and stable. Crime has been a part of society since the beginning and yet we have not done anything drastic to reduce or even remove it because it is needed for society to function normally. Crime has become the somewhat normal in society because of it creates employment opportunities for everyone. Law enforcement, lawyers and judges, security guards all have jobs built around the negativity of crime. People commit crimes for personal reasons such as to support family, themselves, and/or drug addictions. There are endless reasons to why people commit crimes. When a crime has been committed, it disrupts social by changing the normal function of society.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This theory states that it’s a “sociological approach that emphasizes the ways in which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability” (Altrichter, 2016a, slide 3). An example of this would be how inmates play a role in society. They aren’t technically in the same environment as majority of the world are, but they do have different roles to fulfil. They work inside of the private prisons and do labor for private corporations like Wal-Mart, Target and Sears. Every day essentials such as dormitory desks, denim jeans, and law enforcement equipment are produced every day in prison (Altrichter, 2016c, slide 3). If inmates didn’t have jobs like these, they would be sitting in an isolated cell from sun up to sun down not doing anything. Functionalists like Durkheim agreed that crime is an inevitable and delinquent behavior is an aspect of social life. A key assumption in functionalism is the societal consensus which is “a majority of members share a common set of values, beliefs, and behavioral expectations (Altrichter, 2016a, slide 5). With that being said, when crimes occur, reactions happen amongst society and are used to give society a way of defining what is moral and which moral norms to abide by. These norms are then led to rules and boundaries for society. Davis and Moore (1945) stated that social stratification has beneficial consequences for the operation of society (p. 242). If we didn’t have people in the private prisons, we wouldn’t have people to perform the tasks because the average citizen in society wouldn’t voluntarily go to prison to fulfil those roles. According to Davis and Moore (1945), “social inequality is thus an unconsciously evolved device by which societies insure that the most important positions are conscientiously filled by the most qualified persons” (p. 243). In this case, inmates are the most qualified…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics