Arguments For Labelling Bias

Labelling bias occurs in everyday society. For example, within mental illness (Rosenhan, 1973). Evidence show that, labelling bias is putting, or forcing a unique individual in a specific group, and the assumptions others may have of that label (Fox & Stinnett, 1996). Labels are evocative, whether they are for the better, or for the worse. This goes to show that label bias are, too narrow and very limited of a conception to really define an individual. According to Rolision and Medway (1985) there are various labels, which produce a wide range of effects. Therefore, guidelines to avoid labelling bias are appropriate, to reduce any negative effects and stigma an individual may receive from a specific label. Rosenhan (1973) suggests that, categorization
Labels can deliver powerful effects on an individual’s everyday life (Fuller, 1984). Therefore, it is important to provide guidance on avoiding labelling bias, to avoid negative effects on an individual’s life. The American Psychological Association Manual, aims to reduce labelling bias within writing. The APA covers labelling within gender, participation, sexual orientation, disabilities, age, racial and ethnic identity. This guidance is appropriate as it tries to avoid labelling, and language bias, if and when possible. For example, using gender, instead of sex, when referring to women and men. Using sex could be mistaken with sexual behaviour, whereas gender has only one definition. (Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 2010). Only when relevant, differences should be implied. This guideline from the APA, ensures that unbiased labelling, and language is implied when writing. When referring to a patient the APA (2010), states that the patient should be labelled to what they prefer. If an individual feels discriminated in any way by the label, or name given they could lose their unique individuality. When referring to an individual with a specific condition, whether it is depression, or schizophrenia, language or labels that objectifies a person must be avoided. The guidelines by the professional bodies, are in place to establish safety of individuals, and groups on a personal, and also emotional level, from the consequence of labelling within