Preview

Argumentative Essay On Native Americans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1137 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Native Americans
The United States stole land from the Native Americans and the question is “How can the United States make up for the injustices it inflicted on Native Americans?” My Position is team land and giving Native Americans is a better idea and apology for what the United States has done to them.These are my three claims to prove why the Native Americans deserve their land back. My first claim is that the Native Americans were here first and this was their land, not ours. Giving money isn’t going to benefit the Native Americans and is only going to please us. They don’t have resources to provide for their families and are suffering in life. And we should consider giving Native Americans their land for our apology to them. They lost everything to provide for their families which means they can’t live without their land and we are deciding on giving them money is a risky idea because they would probably use it on casinos and other bad stuff. And besides giving them money is basically disrespecting the way Native Americans have been suffering for the past 2 centuries since 1800.

My first reason is that the Native Americans were here first and this was their land, not ours. Giving money isn’t going to benefit the Native Americans and is only going to please us. They don’t have resources to
…show more content…
Those are serious investments.” This means instead of fighting for the past just focus and fight for their future. Native Americans should just forget about the land and focus on the next generation of their race.In conclusion land seems like a better apology for the native americans. Money is just going to hurt the economy If we give money, we are basically hurting our country even more. Native Americans will use money for drugs or any other things besides on what’s important to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 2 (Worth 5 points) How could the federal government have made the Dawes Act more successful? by refusing to allow Native Americans to assimilate by making it illegal for Native Americans to sell their land to speculators by providing larger land parcels so the Native Americans could grow more crops by using land speculators as brokers between the government and Native Americans Points earned on this question: 5 Question 3 (Worth 5 points) What was the goal of the Dawes Act?…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cronon Worksheet

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For the most part Native Americans didn’t have a concept of land ownership. The tribes were very mobile and didn’t stay in one place. They moved from place to place along with the seasons so everything was made so that it could be mobile and could be moved when needed. They did not believe in owning the land however they believe that they should live off of the land.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yakama Case Study

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    government is obligated to extend aid to reservations, claiming that the responsibilities of the EDA extend to all areas that are below the poverty line which includes much of reservation land, others fear that it is often misdirected. Kalt and Cornell discuss the faults of this “standard approach” of U.S. government aid and propose a new solution that they describe as the “nation-building” approach. In this proposed solution, all of the decision making for where money should be spent and what aspects of society are developed are placed in the hands of the native people. This idea is found favorable by many scholars because those who are are making decisions of development are impacted by the effects, whether positive or negative, rather than having the decisions made by an alienated and unaffected third party. The issue with these proposed solution is finding a way to used the government resources in a way that empowers the reservation communities. Also, there are debates around where nonprofits fit into this equation, because in many circumstances they are an unaffected third party, however they usually have a deeper relationship and therefore a better understanding for what is best for the native…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Native Americans lived east of the Mississippi river, they didn’t want to follow the law and be part of U.S. government and wanted to govern their own people. Andrew Jackson being a president of United States didn’t want the group to ignore the government therefore, proposed to move them west of the Mississippi river. In order to justify and keep threats away from the U.S. settlers, the U.S. government promised them bigger land, money, pay for their needs and support for one year as said in the excerpt from Indian Removal Act 1830 (source 1). This act should be justified because it resolved the conflicts between the U.S. and the Indies were given comparable land and support. In Source 2 Andrew Jackson makes a speech about if the Indians movie it will benefit the U.S. and make Alabama and Mississippi stronger.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7.06 History Eng 2

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The "Somebody-Wanted-But-So" chart is an excellent way to summarize important information from history. In it, you identify a person or group of people, their goal, need, or want, what conflict of interest stood in the way, and the outcome. This strategy works great because history depends on the needs, wants, and actions of humans.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cherokee was the last to move and one reason they didn’t want to leave is because the other tribes that went to the Indian territory got their horses taken and people died from diseases. The place had a lot of land for the people probably because everyone who lived there moved because of thieves. In the eyes of the Americans, the Indians should be thankful that we even gave them land. In the Indians eyes again, why kick us out and give us junk land because we won’t want to move.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the Wounded Knee Massacre, the United States government gave the Native Americans many unfulfilled promises. They seized the lands they previously promised to allow the Native Americans to keep. They promised that they would be respected and indiscriminate in American society and safeguard the peace. They also were guaranteed that their culture and sense of pride would not be lost. None of these promises were kept. Over time, the government took their land and massacred their people. One example would be the Wounded Knee Massacre where many Indians were killed in an event characterized by genocide. It never got better for the Native Americans, and even to this day their sufferings continue.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Way before us, Americans came to this beautiful land called America, there were Indians who lived here. They were here more than one hundred before we came here.. How can it be fair for us to move them off their home? That’s why we should let the Indians stay. The Indians also were treated so unfairly and became modernized like us. So let the Indians stay.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many ways you could help prevent the Native American Pipeline. In my opinion the biggest way to prevent the Pipeline is to not let it happen. If Donald Trump lets them build the pipeline there could be many people could lose their water supplies. If this happens it will affect many native americans. Donald trump could alway talk to the tribe leader and they could come to a conclusion. The police are doing horrible things to the Native Americans they are beating them and just being darn right mean to the Native Americans. They could always come to a deal. The government could always buy out the tribe so they could build the pipeline. They could build it in a different place and prevent contaminating the water. The Indians are not…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These lands have been tampered with by the government, reducing them throughout history separating these lands into six different sections. The government has not enforced these treaties such as the Executive Order of March 16 ,1875, giving the native Indians the right to keep their lands but only to reduce them. Acts by our government have caused deprivations and great losses to our native Indians. The past shouldn’t repeat itself these natives have suffered time and time again but the government continues to industrialize these reserved lands instead of respecting them.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should the indians get there land back for there right? this is why I think the indians should get there back. First reason is because Native Americans were here first. They gave up their land to us shouldn't we return the favor. The second reason is that The US Supreme Court agrees," the UN Investigator said. If the Black Hills were returned to the tribe, the Reservation would have natural resources, and a way to earn enough money to survive. My third reason is that All these things contribute to the health, economic, and family problems many American Indians experience daily. Still, American Indians have not really asked for reparations. Why?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Native American Casinos

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After examining the past of Native Americans, their wanting to have a piece of the government pie, and the present affairs under the reservations is different to the living circumstances of Native Americans. It starts with issues such as drug abuse and prevention within the tribes. The next step for them is to ensure they have enough money to support their tribes and encompasses all their needs. Finally, it is how the tribes give back to the states they decide to build casinos in.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Still, American Indians have not really asked for reparations.” Which obviously states they don’t really think as native Americans as equal to us, like the real Americans. It is my sincere belief that the Native Americans would want their land back instead of money. The government was horrible back then and still is now. Some might argue and say that the native americans would prefer money but in my opinion I think it is the right choice to give them back their land.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the West

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Settler did not care about the what the Native Americans thought they just did what ever that wanted. The settlers bought a lot of land and the United States of America sold land, The Settlers thought that who ever got to land first owned and that after they claimed it nobody else could have. The even put barbed wire to mark their area/territory which disturbed buffalo migration system. The Native Americans where not use to this and always wondered why the settlers did this. As you can see the Settlers took all the land that they could and did not want anybody on their land at all.…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays