Argumentative Essay on Legalization of Euthanasia
Argumentative Essay on Legalization of Euthanasia
Introduction
Euthanasia, which is also known as mercy killings, has been pronounced legal in many countries in the present-day world. It basically involves terminating the life of a patient so as to relieve pain and suffering, especially if it has become intolerable. This procedure is normally carried out under strict medical supervision, under which the terminating grant must come from the individual patient. Euthanasia however, has not been embraced by everyone, as some people tend to go against it on the grounds of religion and morality. As much as the euthanasia process painlessly puts a person to death, the responsibility of deciding who dies and who lives should not be left in the doctors’ hands. It is a moral obligation for individuals and the society as a whole to protect human life. When humans take the responsibility of shortening someone’s’ life, that is tantamount to playing divine role, and thus what they do is simply interfere with God’s plan.
Body
To start with, the life of human has a great value, and thus should be preserved in all the possible ways regardless of the circumstances. People ought to understand the sanctity of human life, and know that the life of an innocent human being must never be intentionally put to an end. This should apply independent of whether a proposed treatment is going to have any sort of expected worthwhile effect on the quality of life of the patient.
In addition to this, as much as the patients choice is to be valued, sick individuals may not be in a position to make clear decisions on whether to end their life or not. This follows from the fact that the individuals are not rational enough to make justified decisions to the best of their interests, and therefore it would be unfair to terminate the lives of such persons.
Moreover, euthanasia discourages efforts to improve on cures and treatments. The improvement in terminal care and other treatments has been as a
Introduction
Euthanasia, which is also known as mercy killings, has been pronounced legal in many countries in the present-day world. It basically involves terminating the life of a patient so as to relieve pain and suffering, especially if it has become intolerable. This procedure is normally carried out under strict medical supervision, under which the terminating grant must come from the individual patient. Euthanasia however, has not been embraced by everyone, as some people tend to go against it on the grounds of religion and morality. As much as the euthanasia process painlessly puts a person to death, the responsibility of deciding who dies and who lives should not be left in the doctors’ hands. It is a moral obligation for individuals and the society as a whole to protect human life. When humans take the responsibility of shortening someone’s’ life, that is tantamount to playing divine role, and thus what they do is simply interfere with God’s plan.
Body
To start with, the life of human has a great value, and thus should be preserved in all the possible ways regardless of the circumstances. People ought to understand the sanctity of human life, and know that the life of an innocent human being must never be intentionally put to an end. This should apply independent of whether a proposed treatment is going to have any sort of expected worthwhile effect on the quality of life of the patient.
In addition to this, as much as the patients choice is to be valued, sick individuals may not be in a position to make clear decisions on whether to end their life or not. This follows from the fact that the individuals are not rational enough to make justified decisions to the best of their interests, and therefore it would be unfair to terminate the lives of such persons.
Moreover, euthanasia discourages efforts to improve on cures and treatments. The improvement in terminal care and other treatments has been as a
Cited: Medina, Loreta M.. Euthanasia. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Print. Nash, Gregory J.. A guide to writing argumentative essays. Milton, Qld.: John Wiley Australia, 2011. Print.